Abstract
Background Nature-based social prescribing programmes such as ‘bluespace prescription’ may promote public health and health improvement of individuals with long-term conditions. However, there is limited systematically synthesised evidence that investigates the contexts and mechanisms of Bluespace Prescription Programmes (BPPs) that could inform programme theories for policy and practice.
Methods We conducted a realist review by searching six databases for articles published between January 2000 and February 2020, in English, about health and social care professionals providing referral to or prescription of blue space activities with health-related outcomes. We developed themes of contextual factors by analysing the contexts of BPPs. We used these contextual factors to develop programme theories describing the mechanisms of BPP implementation. Our study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020170660).
Results Fifteen studies with adequate to strong quality were included from 6,736 records. Service users had improvements on their physical, mental, social health, and environmental knowledge after participating in BPPs referred to or prescribed by health and social care professionals. Patient-related contextual factors were referral information, free equipment and transportation, social support, blue space environments, and skills of service providers. Programme-related contextual factors were communication, multi-stakeholder collaboration, financing, and adequate service providers. Programme theories on patient enrolment, engagement, adherence, communication protocols, and long-term programme sustainability described the mechanisms of BPP implementation.
Conclusion BPPs could support health and social care services if contextual factors and mechanisms of programme theories associated with patients and programme delivery are considered for implementation. Our findings have implications in planning, development, and implementation of similar nature-based social prescribing programmes in health and social care settings.
Introduction
Social prescribing (SP) is a health and social care approach that promotes health by connecting individuals to community-based and non-medical programmes providing physical activity and social support (Teuton, 2015; Husk et al., 2020). SP is delivered through four referral pathways: 1) signposting; 2) direct referral; 3) link worker, and 4) holistic link worker (Husk et al., 2020). The process commonly starts with a consultation with a healthcare worker (general practitioner/GP). If GPs give information through leaflets and direct patients to community-based organisations (CBOs) or service providers, this is referred to as signposting. Direct referral is when GPs contact CBOs and arrange patient enrolment. The link worker pathway comprises GPs connecting patients to link workers who arrange patient enrolment. The holistic link worker pathway includes a feedback loop between CBOs and link workers (Husk et al., 2020). Moreover, SP implementation is described by programme theories (Husk et al., 2020; Pawson et al., 2005; Rycroft-Malone et al., 2012) on patient enrolment (first successful referral), engagement (attendance to first session), adherence (maintained participation over time), link worker coordination (communication), and partnerships with CBOs (supportive interventions) (Husk et al., 2020; Bickerdike et al., 2017; Chatterjee et al., 2018; Bertotti et al., 2018). SP could help motivate individuals to engage in health-promoting behaviours such as physical activity, socialisation, and self-management (Husk et al., 2020; Bickerdike et al., 2017; Bertotti et al., 2018). It could also help reduce primary healthcare burden by depressurising healthcare professionals’ workload through promotion of non-clinical interventions (Bertotti et al., 2018).
Nature-based social prescribing or nature prescription is a type of SP that promotes health and wellbeing through contact with nature (Husk et al., 2020; Leavell et al., 2019). Exposure to nature can improve physical and mental health (Hartig et al., 2014), and the presence of blue spaces, defined as natural and manmade outdoor surface water environments, enhances these effects (Pouso et al., 2021; Benton et al., 2021; Völker and Kistemann, 2011). Contact with blue spaces are associated with health outcomes as illustrated by the ‘Blue Space and Health/Wellbeing Model’ (White et al., 2020). Exposure to blue spaces in terms of duration, frequency, and intensity is associated with individuals’ contact with blue spaces which could be indirect (window view), incidental (commute along a river path), or intentional (beach visit) (White et al., 2020; Keniger et al., 2013). Contact with blue spaces improves health outcomes through mitigation (noise abatement), instoration (physical activity), and restoration (stress reduction) pathways (White et al., 2020; Markevych et al., 2017), resulting in improved mood, self-esteem, physical activity, social interactions, and decrease in mortality (Georgiou et al., 2021; Tieges et al., 2020; Finlay et al., 2015). These pathways are associated with environmental (type, quality, weather) or personal (age, gender, ethnicity) effect modifiers influencing engagement with blue space activities (BSAs) (White et al., 2020). The exposure– outcome pathway is catalysed by feedback actions such as quality improvement (societal) and safe access (local) to blue spaces (White et al., 2020). It also includes personal actions such as nature-based social prescribing (Blue Gyms and prescribing therapeutic BSAs) that targets individuals’ motivations to have contact with blue spaces (White et al., 2020; Depledge and Bird, 2009; Britton et al., 2020).
The knowledge base on social prescribing falls behind the fast growth and roll-out of social prescribing programmes on the ground (Husk et al., 2020). There is limited understanding on the contextual implementation of specific types of SP (Husk et al., 2020) including nature-based social prescribing programmes the utilise blue spaces. There is also an evidence gap on the effectiveness (Bickerdike et al., 2017; Chatterjee et al., 2018; Pescheny et al., 2018), suitability (Pilkington et al., 2017), referral processes (Chatterjee et al., 2018), and factors influencing SP uptake (Britton et al., 2020; Buckley and Brough, 2017). Additionally, existing systematic reviews on social prescribing mainly focused on general and greenspace programmes (Husk et al., 2020; Bertotti et al., 2018; Masterton et al., 2020). Considering these gaps and the growing evidence on the health benefits of blue spaces, we conducted a realist review to investigate the contexts and mechanisms of implementing Bluespace Prescription Programmes (BPPs) delivered to people with health conditions. We used realist synthesis (Pawson et al., 2005) to investigate the contextual factors influencing BPP implementation (Pawson et al., 2005; Rycroft-Malone et al., 2012) and used these contextual factors to develop programme theories describing the mechanisms of BPP implementation.
Methods
Our systematic realist review followed the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al., 2021) and realist reviews (Berg, 2016). A realist review is way of evidence synthesis that provides explanation why interventions work or do not work in certain circumstances by interrogating the contextual complexities and mechanisms of implementing such interventions (Rycroft-Malone, 2012). The steps of a realist review are: 1) identifying the question; 2) clarifying the purpose of the review; 3) finding and articulating the initial programme theories; 4) searching for evidence; 5) appraising the evidence; 6) extracting the data; 7) synthesising findings; and 8) drawing conclusions and recommendations (Berg, 2016).
Identifying the question and clarifying the purpose of the review
We defined BPP as individual or group activities that take place in or around natural water environments such as surfing, swimming, running near blue spaces, amongst others (interventions), which are referred to or prescribed by health and social care professionals (population or participants) through SP referral pathways and with health-related outcomes (outcomes) (Husk et al., 2020). We included peer-reviewed research on BPPs conducted in natural water environments which were referred to or prescribed by health and social care workers (GPs, pharmacists, social workers, link workers, etc.) to individuals attending health and social care facilities and with health-related outcomes. We included case reports, qualitative, case-control, cohort, pre-post intervention studies, non-randomised, and randomised controlled trials published in English. We limited the publication period from January 2000 to February 2020 since research on the health benefits of blue spaces emerged in the early 2000s (Völker and Kistemann, 2011; Britton et al., 2020). We excluded studies where non-health or non-social care workers referred BSAs to participants through advertisements and studies in which BSAs were not conducted in natural water environments.
Finding and articulating the initial programme theories
Our search and data analysis were guided by the following initial social prescribing programme theories (PTs):
Initial PT1: If referral is presented in an acceptable manner, it is compatible with the patient’s needs and expectations, and the patient believes that it will improve their condition, then they may enrol (enrolment) (Husk et al., 2020).
Initial PT2: If transportation is provided making the socially prescribed activity accessible to the patient, then they will engage (engagement) (Husk et al., 2020).
Initial PT3: If the service providers are skilled and there are improvements on patient’s condition, then they are more likely to keep attending (adherence) (Husk et al., 2020).
Initial PT4: If there are link workers facilitating delivery of social prescriptions and liaising with health and social care facilities and third sector organisations, then the referral uptake will be successful (link worker coordination) (Husk et al., 2020; Bickerdike et al., 2017; Chatterjee et al., 2018; Bertotti et al., 2018).
Initial PT5: If partnership between health and social care facilities and community-based organisations is financially supported, then the delivery of social prescribing programmes will be sustained (partnership with CBOs) (Bickerdike et al., 2017; Chatterjee et al., 2018; Bertotti et al., 2018).
Searching for evidence
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Scopus, and CINAHL using keyword strings (Appendix 1) and conducted snowball search by screening the reference lists of included studies (Schardt et al., 2007; Jalali and Wohlin, 2012). Records were uploaded, de-duplicated, and screened using Rayyan QCRI (Ouzzani et al., 2016). Title, abstract (JA, KH, SCh, and 17 researchers), and full-text screenings (JA–KH, JA–SCh) were independently conducted in pairs. KNI resolved conflicting decisions.
Appraising the evidence
Included studies were categorised based on their methodological approaches to suit the QualSyst tools (Kmet et al., 2004). Quality of studies was independently assessed in pairs (JA– KH, JA–SCh, JA–KNI). Conflicting ratings were reconciled by one-to-one discussion. We adopted strong (>0·80), good (0·71–0·79), adequate (0·51–0·70), and limited (<0·50) quality thresholds for quantitative papers (Lee et al., 2008) and used adequate (>0·55) and low (<0·54) for qualitative studies (Maharaj and Harding, 2016). Quantitative and qualitative components of mixed method studies were assessed separately (Kmet et al., 2004; Maharaj and Harding, 2016).
Extracting the data
JA electronically extracted the names of authors, publication year, methodological approaches, participants, location, prescriber/referrers, referral pathways, facilities, intervention format, BSA type, facilitators, barriers, timescale/duration, dose/frequency, health conditions, and outcomes. Extracted data were inputted in a bespoke data collection form using Microsoft Excel.
Synthesising the findings
We employed realist synthesis to analyse and synthesise extracted data (Pawson et al., 2005; Rycroft-Malone et al., 2012) about the facilitators, barriers, and descriptions of BPPs and how were they implemented. Using hybrid coding in NVivo 12 (Fereday and Muir-Cochrane, 2006), JA developed themes of contextual factors associated with BPP implementation. These contextual factors were used to develop the context-mechanism-outcome configurations elaborated by ‘if-then’ statements for the development of programme theories describing the mechanism of BPP implementation (Pawson et al., 2005; Rycroft-Malone et al., 2012; Pawson and Bellamy, 2006; Thomas and Harden, 2008). We developed programme theories for BPP implementation by refining the five initial social prescribing programme theories on patient enrolment, engagement, adherence, link worker coordination, and partnership with CBOs (Husk et al., 2020; Rycroft-Malone et al., 2012; Bickerdike et al., 2017; Chatterjee et al., 2018; Bertotti et al., 2018; Pawson and Bellamy, 2006). The developed themes of contextual factors and programme theories for BPP implementation were consulted and validated by JA in a series of virtual meetings and presentations with KH, KNI, SCh; members of the research advisory team (RH, SP, SCu); and other stakeholders from the Hydro Nation Forum, the policy governing body of the Hydro Nation Scholars Programme, which is the funding organisation of this research. The themes of contextual factors and programme theories were refined and finalised based on the comments from these consultations.
Our study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020170660).
Results
Search results
We collected 6,736 records from the database and snowball search (Figure 1). We excluded 3,814 duplicates before screening and 2,483 reports due to irrelevancy at title and abstract screening stage. We excluded 136 and 288 reports from database and citation searches, respectively, at full-text screening stage (Appendix 2).
Quality assessment results
We included 15 studies. Four quantitative studies had strong (Razani et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2014; Vella et al., 2013; Maund et al., 2019), two had good (Godfrey et al., 2015; James et al., 2017), and three had adequate quality (de Matos et al., 2017; Hignett et al., 2017; Cavanaugh and Rademacher, 2014). Seven qualitative studies had adequate quality (Maund et al., 2019; White et al., 2016; Lopes, 2015; Bennett et al., 2014; Dustin et al., 2011; Fleischmann et al., 2011; Mowatt and Bennett, 2011). Quantitative papers were downgraded due to strategies on controlling confounders and reporting variance estimates. Qualitative papers were downgraded because of data collection, verification, and reflexivity procedures (Table 1) (Agarwal et al., 2013).
Since realist reviews require contextual configurations to describe mechanisms of programme implementation, we did not exclude studies which had below average quality results (Pawson et al., 2005; Rycroft-Malone et al., 2012).
Characteristics of included studies
Eight studies were conducted in the USA (Razani et al., 2018; de Matos et al., 2017; Bennett et al., 2014; Rogers et al., 2014; Vella et al., 2013; Dustin et al., 2011; Fleischmann et al., 2011; Mowatt and Bennett, 2011), five studies in the UK (Maund et al., 2019; Godfrey et al., 2015; Hignett et al., 2017; Cavanaugh and Rademacher, 2014; White et al., 2016), and two in Portugal (de Matos et al., 2017; Lopes, 2015) (Table 2). Eight hundred three (803) service users aged between 2 and 85 years participated in the studies, of which 197 were veterans aged between 21 and 50 years. BSAs were referred to or prescribed by health, social care, and health-trained teachers. The prescription or referral was provided in healthcare (Razani et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2014; Vella et al., 2013; Godfrey et al., 2015; James et al., 2017; White et al., 2016; Bennett et al., 2014; Dustin et al., 2011; Fleischmann et al., 2011; Mowatt and Bennett, 2011), social care (Maund et al., 2019; Godfrey et al., 2015; James et al., 2017; de Matos et al., 2017; White et al., 2016), and specialised educational facilities (Godfrey et al., 2015; Hignett et al., 2017; Cavanaugh and Rademacher, 2014) using SP referral pathways (Husk et al., 2020). In one study, all three facilities provided the referral or prescription (Godfrey et al., 2015).
Blue space activities prescribed in healthcare facilities
Ten studies were in military hospitals, GP practices, paediatric, and rehabilitation clinics (Razani et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2014; Vella et al., 2013; Godfrey et al., 2015; James et al., 2017; White et al., 2016; Bennett et al., 2014; Dustin et al., 2011; Fleischmann et al., 2011; Mowatt and Bennett, 2011). Veterans with hearing impairment, anxiety, depression, TBI, and PTSD were prescribed with fly-fishing by recreational therapists through signposting or direct referral (Vella et al., 2013; Bennett et al., 2014; Mowatt and Bennett, 2011). Veterans with PTSD were directly referred to a combination of running, boating, kayaking, and paddling by a team of recreational therapist, nurse, psychologist, and social worker (Dustin et al., 2011). Some veterans with PTSD (Rogers et al., 2014) and children who were obese, had sensory problems, depression, anxiety, and PTSD (Godfrey et al., 2015) were prescribed with surfing by physicians (Rogers et al., 2014) or a team of GPs, nurses, and psychologists (Godfrey et al., 2015) through direct referral or holistic link worker. Socioeconomically deprived and ethnically diverse children with obesity, loneliness, and poor mental health were prescribed with play at a beach (Razani et al., 2018; James et al., 2017) by pediatricians using holistic link worker (James et al., 2017) or a combination of signposting and link worker pathways (Razani et al., 2018). Patients who experienced substance abuse were directly referred to sailing by substance abuse specialists (White et al., 2016). Participants had improvements in mood and emotions (Razani et al., 2018; White et al., 2016), better sleep quality (Vella et al., 2013), self-efficacy (White et al., 2016; Bennett et al., 2014; Mowatt and Bennett, 2011), reduced substance intake (White et al., 2016; Dustin et al., 2011), decreased stress and PTSD symptomatology (Rogers et al., 2014; Vella et al., 2013), and increased relaxation (Razani et al., 2018; Vella et al., 2013; Mowatt and Bennett, 2011). Some felt less depressed, anxious, and lonely (Razani et al., 2018) whilst others felt improvements in their mobility (Fleischmann et al., 2011), physical activity (Razani et al., 2018; James et al., 2017), and body weight (James et al., 2017). Others had improved social skills and increased contact with nature (Razani et al., 2018).
Blue space activities prescribed in social care facilities
Four studies were in social care institution, foster care homes, and community wellbeing centre (Maund et al., 2019; Godfrey et al., 2015; de Matos et al., 2017; Lopes, 2015). Young people and adults with mobility and sensory impairment (Lopes, 2015), psychosocial problems, anxiety, and depression were directly referred to surfing by either a team of social worker and therapist (Lopes, 2015); social worker and adolescent educators (de Matos et al., 2017); or social child support specialist (Godfrey et al., 2015; de Matos et al., 2017; Lopes, 2015). Adults and elderly patients with anxiety and depression were referred to guided river walks, bird and otter watching, and canoeing by mental health workers through a link worker pathway (Maund et al., 2019). Participants improved daily functioning, self-esteem (Godfrey et al., 2015), fitness, physical activity (Godfrey et al., 2015; de Matos et al., 2017), mental and emotional wellbeing (Godfrey et al., 2015; de Matos et al., 2017), interpersonal competencies (Godfrey et al., 2015; de Matos et al., 2017; Lopes, 2015), and environmental knowledge (Lopes, 2015).
Blue space activities prescribed in specialised educational institutions
Three studies were in specialised educational facilities and pupil referral units (Godfrey et al., 2015; Hignett et al., 2017; Cavanaugh and Rademacher, 2014). Young people with behavioural problems, ASD, depression, anxiety, and sensory problems were referred to surfing by psychologists, health-trained educators, or social and child support specialists using direct referral or holistic link worker pathways (Godfrey et al., 2015; Hignett et al., 2017; Cavanaugh and Rademacher, 2014). Participants had improvements in their attitude (Hignett et al., 2017), self-esteem (Godfrey et al., 2015), physical fitness (Godfrey et al., 2015; Hignett et al., 2017), mental and emotional wellbeing (Hignett et al., 2017), social competence (Godfrey et al., 2015; Hignett et al., 2017; Cavanaugh and Rademacher, 2014), and ecological knowledge (Hignett et al., 2017).
Contextual factors and programmes theories describing the mechanisms of BPP implementation
The patterns of contextual factors (CFs) associated with the implementation of BPPs are either patient-related or programme-related. In total, we identified 20 patient and programme-related contextual factors (Table 3). The patient-related contextual factors are presentation of information on prescription or referral (CF1), patient perceptions of blue space activities (CF2), programme format (activity, timescale, frequency, duration) (CF3), accessibility (provision of transportation, equipment, other logistics) (CF4), compatibility of blue space activities to patient needs (CF5), social environment (CF6), blue space environment (CF7), skilled service providers (CF8), values of service providers (CF9), social support (CF10), and health, wellbeing, and other personal improvements of service users (CF11). The programme-related contextual factors are: coordination between link workers, service providers, and health and social care facilities (CF12), patient-to-link worker communication (CF13), patient-to-healthcare provider communication (CF14), patient-to-service provider communication (CF15), patient-to-patient communication (16), patient-to-carer communication (CF17), organisational support (staff and volunteers) (CF18), stakeholder support (CF19), and funding and policy support (CF20).
The combinations of 20 patient and programme-related contextual factors informed the development of programme theories describing the mechanisms of BPP implementation (Pawson et al., 2005; Rycroft-Malone et al., 2012; Pawson and Bellamy, 2006). Table 4 presents how the different contextual factors informed the development of final programme theories for BPP implementation based on the initial social prescribing programme theories.
Figure 2 illustrates the delivery of BPP in health and social care settings and at what stage or component of the implementation where each programme theory is associated.
Final Programme Theory 1: If service users’ apprehensions and optimism are positively influenced by information on BPPs provided by prescribers, then they may enrol
Some service users were optimistic towards BPPs, whilst others had apprehensions (Rogers et al., 2014; Lopes, 2015). The novelty of BPPs, unfamiliar environments, and patient’s lack of experience generated fear and anxiety (Lopes, 2015). Knowledge sharing through counselling using information about the type, structure, and benefits of BPPs, coupled with maps, pedometers, and activity guides informed patients’ decisions to enrol (Razani et al., 2018; James et al., 2017). Patients’ enrolment was guided by written prescriptions and initiated contact by link workers (James et al., 2017). Some healthcare workers raised concerns about filling out paper prescriptions being time-consuming and suggested integrating prescriptions of BSAs in the electronic prescribing system (James et al., 2017). Structured BSAs followed programmes of activities (Rogers et al., 2014; Vella et al., 2013; Maund et al., 2019; Godfrey et al., 2015; James et al., 2017; de Matos et al., 2017; Hignett et al., 2017; Bennett et al., 2014) whilst others were provided in an unstructured manner (Razani et al., 2018; James et al., 2017; Mowatt and Bennett, 2011). BPPs were provided as stay-in which required free meals and lodging (Vella et al., 2013; Hignett et al., 2017; Bennett et al., 2014; Dustin et al., 2011; Mowatt and Bennett, 2011), or stay-out (Razani et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2014; Maund et al., 2019; Godfrey et al., 2015; James et al., 2017; White et al., 2016; Lopes, 2015; Fleischmann et al., 2011).
Final Programme Theory 2: If service users are provided with free logistics, equipment, and transportation to access a socially supportive and client-centred blue space activity and environment, then they may engage
Patient engagement was associated with patient preference, skills, and psychosocial fulfilment after initial sessions (Godfrey et al., 2015; Hignett et al., 2017). Consulting people with disabilities about the design of safety and supportive infrastructure making the environment accessible and adaptive to their needs enabled engagement (Lopes, 2015; Bennett et al., 2014). Service users had strong interests in BPPs because these were free (James et al., 2017). However, some BPPs (surfing, canoeing, kayaking) required costly equipment, especially for economically deprived service users. Providing equipment, transportation, and camping fees encouraged engagement especially for activities in distant locations (Razani et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2014; Vella et al., 2013; Maund et al., 2019; Godfrey et al., 2015; James et al., 2017; Bennett et al., 2014). Travelling in groups to new places also relieved anxious participants (Maund et al., 2019). Wildlife and natural blue space or water environments facilitated relaxing experiences, distraction, engagement of human senses, self-strength, and acclimatisation (Vella et al., 2013; Maund et al., 2019; White et al., 2016; Bennett et al., 2014; Dustin et al., 2011). Weather was an environmental effect modifier (White et al., 2020; Hignett et al., 2017).
Final Programme Theory 3: If service users experience social support and health improvement through blue space activities delivered by knowledgeable and skilled service providers, then they may adhere
Skilled service providers ensured standardised programme delivery using regularly evaluated guidelines (Hignett et al., 2017). Service providers were also trained on working with clients with disabilities (proper use of surfing boards for children with ASD) (Cavanaugh and Rademacher, 2014; Lopes, 2015). Positive values of service providers were appreciated by participants (Razani et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2014; Maund et al., 2019; Hignett et al., 2017; White et al., 2016; Lopes, 2015; Bennett et al., 2014). Encouragement, enthusiasm, and positive reinforcement through constructive observations created a friendly atmosphere and empowered participants to explore new activities (Razani et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2014; Maund et al., 2019; White et al., 2016; Lopes, 2015). Staff responsiveness facilitated connection with participants (Mowatt and Bennett, 2011) through open communications (Razani et al., 2018). This was perceived by clients as genuine care and willingness to help (Rogers et al., 2014). Improvements in environmental awareness and knowledge (Hignett et al., 2017; Lopes, 2015), self-esteem (Rogers et al., 2014; Vella et al., 2013; Maund et al., 2019; Godfrey et al., 2015; Cavanaugh and Rademacher, 2014; White et al., 2016; Lopes, 2015), mental health (Razani et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2014; Vella et al., 2013; Maund et al., 2019), physical health (Maund et al., 2019; Hignett et al., 2017; Fleischmann et al., 2011), social health (de Matos et al., 2017; Hignett et al., 2017; White et al., 2016), and reduced dependency on medicines (Dustin et al., 2011; Fleischmann et al., 2011) and addictive substances (White et al., 2016) were also associated with patient adherence.
Final Programme Theory 4: If communication protocols are in place between service users, prescribers, link workers, and service providers, then BPPs may be more visible and successfully implemented in health and social care facilities
Different communication channels were used within and outside health and social care facilities. Initial presentation of BPPs to prescribers facilitated planning of referral processes, requirements, and responsibilities (James et al., 2017; de Matos et al., 2017). Electronic communications provided feedback channels to discuss patients’ health conditions (James et al., 2017). Champions or advocates of BPPs in health and social care settings acted as programme leads and maintained coordination and programme visibility in health and social care facilities (James et al., 2017). Inclusive communication between health and social care workers, patients, and service providers facilitated by link workers and considered patient-preferred mechanisms and related attributes (Razani et al., 2018; James et al., 2017; Mowatt and Bennett, 2011) were also associated with health improvements (Rogers et al., 2014). Communications between patients and carers provided spaces for awareness raising and socialisation (Lopes, 2015). Socialisation between patients through interest-based grouping and matching also contributed to self-improvement (Razani et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2014; James et al., 2017; de Matos et al., 2017; Lopes, 2015; Mowatt and Bennett, 2011).
Final Programme Theory 5: If BPPs are supported by organisational, stakeholder, funding, and policy interventions, then these are more likely to be sustainably implemented
Surfing was perceived as a beneficial health and social care intervention by health sector stakeholders, general public, and policymakers (Lopes, 2015). The health and social benefits of BPPs convinced funders, councils, and schools to support the programme (Hignett et al., 2017), especially because the cost of therapeutic surfing (£50/session) was less than the mental healthcare cost for young people (£265/year) (de Matos et al., 2017; Knapp et al., 2011). However, this economic evaluation was not robust (de Matos et al., 2017). Many BPPs were created through health and CBO partnerships (James et al., 2017; Dustin et al., 2011). Other BPPs received financial support from funding institutions (Godfrey et al., 2015; Hignett et al., 2017). Shared resources covered many implementation aspects (e.g., meals, transportation, equipment) making BPPs accessible to service users (Godfrey et al., 2015; James et al., 2017; Hignett et al., 2017; Lopes, 2015; Bennett et al., 2014). Adequate skilled staff and volunteers were the backbones of BPPs. Client-provider ratio depended on participant intake, activities, and financial capacity (Maund et al., 2019; Godfrey et al., 2015; James et al., 2017; de Matos et al., 2017; Cavanaugh and Rademacher, 2014).
Discussion
Bluespace Prescription Programme (BPP) implemented in health and social care facilities contextualised by programme theories on patient enrolment, engagement, adherence, communication protocol, and programme sustainability had benefits on general, physical, mental, social health, and ecological knowledge of service users. These programme theories were shaped by configurations of contextual factors on patient needs and characteristics, accessibility, compatibility, social and blue space environments, skills and values of service providers, patient health improvement, communication, multi-stakeholder partnership, financing, and policy.
Outcomes investigated in this review are consistent with current evidence demonstrating that exposure to blue spaces has physical and mental health benefits (Völker and Kistemann, 2011; Gascon et al., 2017). Additionally, some BPPs had educational activities about the environment and these improved participants’ knowledge about the value of blue spaces and paved way for the development of pro-environmental behaviours (White et al., 2020). BPPs package the health-promoting impacts of blue spaces into structured health and social care programmes for those who could most benefit from these. From a behaviour change perspective (Michie et al., 2011), improving the quality and accessibility of blue spaces could provide greater opportunities for contact with these environments (White et al., 2020). However, these environmental modifications should be coupled with capability-building (knowledge sharing) and motivational strategies (social support) to promote and sustain contact with natural settings (Sharma et al., 2020), such as blue spaces.
BPPs target individuals’ motivations to increase utilisation of blue spaces for physical or social activities (Depledge and Bird, 2009; Britton et al., 2020). However, BPPs might not be for everyone as environmental and personal circumstances are associated with engagement (White et al., 2020). Medicalisation of spending time in nature could be perceived as a medical order rather than a personal choice (Tester-Jones et al., 2020). Prescribing specific blue spaces could reduce patients’ intrinsic motivation to visit nature, thus compromising its health benefits (Tester-Jones et al., 2020). Patient autonomy (Varkey, 2021) through a patient-centred approach using motivational interview should be considered in selecting BSAs which are compatible with patients’ health and personal needs (Britten et al., 2000; Little et al., 2001; Cockburn and Pit, 1997). The investigated BPPs in this review had higher duration than the 120 minutes per week recommended dose of nature (White et al., 2019). However, duration could be a modifying factor for nature engagement (White et al., 2020). Duration of BPPs should be matched with patients’ gender (Alejandre and Lynch, 2020; Vert et al., 2019; Elliott et al., 2018), age (Alejandre and Lynch, 2020; Garrett et al., 2019; Helbich et al., 2019; Dempsey et al., 2018), ethnicity (Leeworthy, 2001; Wolch and Zhang, 2004), and health conditions (Wood et al., 2016; Amoly et al., 2014). Increasing choices for BSAs such as dragon boating (Britton et al., 2020), recreational SCUBA diving (Dimmock, 2009), open water swimming (van Tulleken et al., 2018; Huttunen et al., 2004), and cycling near blue spaces (Roberts et al., 2018; Mackay and Neill, 2010; Pretty et al., 2007) could promote inclusivity and attract enrolment and engagement of many individuals with different personal characteristics and health needs. Engagement with and adherence to BPPs could be facilitated by positive doctor-patient interaction because it promotes patient’s self-confidence, motivation, and optimism (Ha and Longnecker, 2010). However, in one systematic review, only six studies had healthcare professionals prescribing BSAs (Britton et al., 2020). Some BSAs are prescribed by a team of health and social care workers with different backgrounds, specialisations, and expeertise. Appropriateness training of prescribers is an SP barrier (Britton et al., 2020), thus, health and social care professionals with varied backgrounds and skill sets should be provided with needs-based and standardised trainings on delivery protocols.
Realist reviews on general social prescribing and greenspace programmes highlighted doctor-patient relationship, capacity of service providers, and supportive social environments as contextual factors to implementation (Husk et al., 2020; Masterton et al., 2020), these were also highlighted in our review. Additionally, communication protocols, stakeholder collaboration, and policy support are fundamental programme-related factors associated with programme continuity (Masterton et al., 2020; McHale et al., 2020). Communication protocols between prescribers, link workers, and service providers facilitated by written prescriptions were essential elements of the referral pathways (Husk et al., 2020). England’s National Health Service backs the link worker-based model (NHS England, 2019) because link workers support healthcare delivery by facilitating resolutions for patient’s health concerns (Husk et al., 2020; Bertotti et al., 2018) through motivational counselling and by coordinating referrals between prescribers, patients, and service providers (Bickerdike et al., 2017; Chatterjee et al., 2018; Bertotti et al., 2018). Moreover, written prescriptions increased likelihood of patient enrolment because these were perceived as alternative to pharmaceutical prescriptions (McHale et al., 2020; Dempster et al., 2015). Many BPPs are also formed through health and stakeholder partnerships which are funding dependent. Unstable funding affects sustained SP organisation and delivery (Bertotti et al., 2018). There is also a perceived risk in data sharing between healthcare facilities and CBOs. Policies on institutionalising BPPs in government-funded health services and data sharing agreement between stakeholders are necessary. Moreover, medicalising ecosystem services of blue spaces could go against some ecological paradigms (Ofiara and Brown, 1999) within the scope of the environment sector. BSAs could cause disturbances to fish and other wildlife, human-induced pollution, and other irreversible ecosystem degradation (Maxwell et al., 2018; Burgin and Hardiman, 2011; Graham and Cooke, 2008; Davenport and Davenport, 2006). The ethical principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence (Varkey, 2021) should be extended for the protection of nature by involving healthcare specialists, environmentalists, patient groups, and blue space communities in planning and implementing BPPs that aims for the protection of patients and the environment.
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the health-related use of outdoor environments increased during lockdowns (Hartig et al., 2014; Hubbard et al., 2021; Geng et al., 2021) suggesting that outdoor settings such as blue spaces helped people cope with stress (Heo et al., 2020). People in Scotland and Spain associated exposure to nature with mental health improvements and better sleep quality (Hartig et al., 2014; Corley et al., 2021). Contact with nature is associated with fewer mental and physical symptoms and may buffer the impacts of social isolation (Yang et al., 2021; Bratman et al., 2019; Van den Berg et al., 2015). BPPs could be used as an additional healthcare service to help the health sector meet increasing demands for mental healthcare. Link workers could facilitate BPPs through virtual health assessments and motivational interviewing (Razai et al., 2020). However, accessibility, safety, and financial concerns were also associated with less time and fewer visits in blue spaces (Astell-Burt and Feng, 2021) which should be considered and resolved. A siloed approach in tackling the mental health epidemic compounded by lockdowns and social isolation will not work as we transition to a ‘better normal’ after the COVID-19 pandemic. Approaches should include strong collaboration between health, environment, urban planning, third sector, amongst others to share more resources toward integrating BPPs in primary healthcare with appropriate environmental-economic accounting (United Nations-Food and Agriculture Organisation, European Union, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and World Bank Group, 2014). These collaborations and resources should ensure that contextual factors influencing enrolment, engagement, and adherence to BPPs are addressed along with effective communication and programme continuity.
Strengths and limitations
We did not include grey literature and we only focused on BPPs prescribed in health and social care settings. Reports on BPPs in other facilities which are unpublished or not peer-reviewed could provide more information about other contextual factors and mechanisms of implementation. There were also limitations on the quality of individual studies. Many quantitative studies had quality issues on the strategies for controlling confounders and reporting variance estimates, whilst qualitative papers had issues on strategies for data collection, verification, and reflexivity.
Certain limitations are also anchored in employing a realist review. Realist synthesis is interpretative and subjective in nature (Masterton et al., 2020), especially in interpreting how contextual factors inform the development of programme theories. We ensured to remove this subjectivity bias by validating the results of the analysis during a series of stakeholders’ meetings and consultation with a multidisciplinary set of co-authors that informed the finalisation of the programme theories for BPP implementation. We were also limited on the available information about the contexts and mechanisms of each bluespace prescription programme in each study, especially when there is no detailed information about the intervention.
Geographical homogeneity was also a limitation. Some studies had participants from different ethnicities and sociodemographic backgrounds, but all studies were conducted in the Global North. Nonetheless, our study offers pragmatic recommendations for policy development supporting BPP implementation in different contexts. In the context of Global South countries, it is important to be cognisant of the political and social constructs surrounding blue space accessibility and the readiness of health systems for large-scale BPP implementation. Nevertheless, universal healthcare reforms in developing countries could leverage the groundwork on BPP integration in health promotion strategies to deliver the vision of healthy, liveable, and sustainable environments for all.
Research directions
We suggest the conduct of intervention studies examining the intersection of BPPs, physical, and mental health as cost-effective programmes. Implementation research and pilot studies are needed to establish the ‘proof of concept’ of BPPs as a viable public health intervention for scaling-up and institutionalisation in national and local health and social care systems. Causation and long-term implications of BPPs on population health, healthcare delivery, and the environment should be investigated through randomised controlled trials and longitudinal studies.
Conclusion
In summary, this realist review demonstrates that health, social care, and health-trained professionals working in health, social care, and specialised educational facilities provided referral to or prescription of BSAs. Service users of BPPs were veterans, adults, older people, and children who experienced physical and mental health conditions, social isolation, addiction, and/or behavioural issues. BPPs improved the physical, mental, and social health, as well as environmental knowledge of service users. The implementation of BPPs is associated with 20 unique patient and programme-related contextual factors on patient needs and characteristics, accessibility, compatibility, social and blue space environments, skills and values of service providers, patient health improvement, communication, multi-stakeholder partnership, financing, and policy. The configurations of these contextual factors informed the refinement of pre-existing social prescribing programme theories for the development of programme theories of BPPs. If implementation of accessible and patient centred BPPs is sustainably supported by multi-stakeholder partnerships, funding, policy interventions, effective communication protocols, skilled health and social care workers and service providers, then service users are more likely to enrol in, engage with, adhere to, and have improvements to health and environmental knowledge after the programme. Contextual factors and programme theories of investigated BPPs could inform development and implementation of similar nature-based social prescribing programmes in other contexts. BPPs could be an additional health and social care service that promote exposure to blue spaces for public health promotion and health improvement of individuals with multiple and long-term health conditions. With inaccessibility, long waiting list, adverse effects, incompatibility, cost, and environmental impacts of conventional healthcare, integrating patient centred and sustainable BPPs into a suite of healthcare services is beneficial.
Data Availability
Beginning three months after publication until September 2023, database records and extracted data from included studies will be electronically shared to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal sent to the corresponding author. The request will be approved by the corresponding author and the director of studies.
Funding
This systematic review was funded by the Scottish Government Hydro Nation Scholars Programme.
Declaration of competing interests
We declare no competing interests.
Data sharing
Beginning three months after publication until September 2023, database records and extracted data from included studies will be electronically shared to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal sent to the corresponding author. The request will be approved by the corresponding author and the director of studies.
Acknowledgments
The corresponding author acknowledges funding from the Hydro Nation Scholars Programme of the Scottish Government. Author KNI [retracted for anonymity] acknowledges funding from the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS). We would like to thank the Blue-Green Prescribing Reviewers Group composed of 11 researchers: A Estandarte (France); A San Buenaventura, MLA Vega, MAR Manalili, PJ Algones (Philippines); A Konapur, R Ungarala, S Medithi (India); C Lewnet, K Munro (United Kingdom); and V Ashipala (Namibia).
References
