Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines for reducing susceptibility to infection with the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2

Karan Pattni, Daniel Hungerford, Sarah Adams, View ORCID ProfileIain Buchan, Christopher P Cheyne, Marta García-Fiñana, Ian Hall, David M Hughes, View ORCID ProfileChristopher Overton, Xingna Zhang, View ORCID ProfileKieran J. Sharkey
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.12.21264840
Karan Pattni
1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Hungerford
2Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Adams
3Graphnet Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iain Buchan
4Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Iain Buchan
Christopher P Cheyne
5Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta García-Fiñana
5Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Hall
6Department of Mathematics and School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester
7Joint Universities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M Hughes
5Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Overton
6Department of Mathematics and School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christopher Overton
Xingna Zhang
3Graphnet Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kieran J. Sharkey
1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kieran J. Sharkey
  • For correspondence: kjs@liverpool.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background From January to May 2021 the alpha variant (B.1.1.7) of SARS-CoV-2 was the most commonly detected variant in the UK, but since then the Delta variant (B.1.617.2), first detected in India, has become the predominant variant. The UK COVID-19 vaccination programme started on 8th December 2020. Most vaccine effectiveness studies to date have focused on the alpha variant. We therefore aimed to estimate the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines in preventing infection with respect to the Delta variant in a UK setting.

Methods We used anonymised public health record data linked to infection data (PCR) using the Combined Intelligence for Population Health Action resource. We then constructed an SIR epidemic model to explain SARS-CoV-2 infection data across the Cheshire and Merseyside region of the UK.

Results We determined that the effectiveness of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine in reducing susceptibility to infection is 39% (95% credible interval [34,43]) and 64% (95% credible interval [61,67]) for a single dose and a double dose respectively. For the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, the effectiveness is 20% (95% credible interval [10,28]) and 84% (95% credible interval [82,86]) for a single-dose and a double dose respectively.

Conclusion Vaccine effectiveness for reducing susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection shows noticeable improvement after receiving two doses of either vaccine. Findings also suggest that a full course of the Pfizer-BioNTech provides the optimal protection against infection with the Delta variant. This would advocate for completing the full course programme to maximise individual protection and reduce transmission.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

We thank CIPHA for providing access to the data used in this study. KJS and KP acknowledge support from the EPSRC (grant EP/T031727/1). DH is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Post-doctoral Fellowship (PDF-2018-11-ST2-006).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics committee of The University of Liverpool waived ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Pseudonymised data are accessible via Combined Intelligence for Population Health Action (CI-PHA). Requests can be made to the Data Asset and Access Group for extracts of the larger-scale data which cannot be released openly due to information governance requirements. All R code is accessible from the corresponding author.

  • Abbreviations

    AIC
    Akaike Information Criterion
    CI
    Confidence interval
    CIPHA
    Combined Intelligence for Population Health Action
    MCMC
    Markov Chain Monte Carlo
    NHS
    National Health Service
    NIMS
    National Immunisation Management System
    PCR
    Polymerase Chain Reaction
    RNA
    Ribose Nucleic Acid
    SARS-CoV-2
    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
    SIR
    Susceptible, Infectious or Recovered/Removed
    SEIR
    Susceptible, Exposed, Infectious or Recovered/Removed
    UK
    United Kingdom
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted October 14, 2021.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines for reducing susceptibility to infection with the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines for reducing susceptibility to infection with the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2
    Karan Pattni, Daniel Hungerford, Sarah Adams, Iain Buchan, Christopher P Cheyne, Marta García-Fiñana, Ian Hall, David M Hughes, Christopher Overton, Xingna Zhang, Kieran J. Sharkey
    medRxiv 2021.10.12.21264840; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.12.21264840
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines for reducing susceptibility to infection with the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2
    Karan Pattni, Daniel Hungerford, Sarah Adams, Iain Buchan, Christopher P Cheyne, Marta García-Fiñana, Ian Hall, David M Hughes, Christopher Overton, Xingna Zhang, Kieran J. Sharkey
    medRxiv 2021.10.12.21264840; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.12.21264840

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Epidemiology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (179)
    • Allergy and Immunology (431)
    • Anesthesia (99)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (940)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
    • Dermatology (109)
    • Emergency Medicine (260)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (418)
    • Epidemiology (8967)
    • Forensic Medicine (4)
    • Gastroenterology (417)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1938)
    • Geriatric Medicine (190)
    • Health Economics (400)
    • Health Informatics (1320)
    • Health Policy (657)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (517)
    • Hematology (211)
    • HIV/AIDS (416)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10764)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (570)
    • Medical Education (199)
    • Medical Ethics (52)
    • Nephrology (221)
    • Neurology (1815)
    • Nursing (108)
    • Nutrition (271)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (351)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (469)
    • Oncology (992)
    • Ophthalmology (296)
    • Orthopedics (111)
    • Otolaryngology (182)
    • Pain Medicine (126)
    • Palliative Medicine (44)
    • Pathology (265)
    • Pediatrics (576)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (275)
    • Primary Care Research (234)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1891)
    • Public and Global Health (4107)
    • Radiology and Imaging (674)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (361)
    • Respiratory Medicine (547)
    • Rheumatology (224)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (190)
    • Sports Medicine (177)
    • Surgery (206)
    • Toxicology (38)
    • Transplantation (109)
    • Urology (80)