Abstract
Objectives Patient-specific multiscale modeling simulates virtual surgeries of the Fontan procedure using three different graft options. Predictive modeling details post-operative outcomes that can help inform clinical decision support.
Methods Six patients underwent preoperative cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and catheterization. Virtual surgery is carried out for each patient to test the resulting hemodynamics of three Fontan graft options: ECC, 9mm Y-graft, and 12mm Y-graft.
Results 1) one-way ANOVA p>0.998 in all systemic pressures and flows between graft options, 2) p=0.706 for hepatic flow distribution between graft options, 3) local power loss differences do not affect the systemic circulation, 4) anastomosis positioning modification of the same Y-graft in the same patient changed left PA hepatic distribution from 0.66 to 0.49
Conclusions Systemic pressures and blood flow after the Fontan procedure are not affected by graft selection but are well influenced by patient pulmonary vascular impedance. The hepatic distribution can be affected by anastomosis placement.
Ultra-mini abstract We present the first case series of patient-specific multiscale modeling of the Fontan procedure. Despite noticeable local power loss differences, graft selection does not affect systemic pressure and flow rates or other clinically relevant quantities. Anastomosis placement can affect hepatic distribution.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Leducq Foundation through a Transatlantic Network of Excellence Program grant, the National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre Funding Scheme, a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career award at the Scientific Interface, an American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship, NSF CAREER OCI-1150184, and a British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Fellowship FS/12/35/29566.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The review entities were Medical University of South Carolina Institutional Review Board and Great Ormond Street Hospital Institutional Review Board. Full approval was given at the start of the project and was renewed yearly until enrollment was completed.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Statement There are no conflicts of interest associated with this work.
Data Availability
NA
Abbreviations
- BSA
- body surface area
- CI
- cardiac index
- CMR
- cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
- GA
- general anaesthetic
- Hb
- hemoglobin
- HLHS
- hypoplastic left heart syndrome
- IVC
- inferior vena cava
- LPA
- left pulmonary artery
- LPN
- lumped parameter network
- PAs
- pulmonary arteries
- PAP
- pulmonary artery pressure
- PVR
- pulmonary vascular resistance
- SVC
- superior vena cava
- TPG
- trans-pulmonary gradient
