Abstract
Drug addiction is characterized by impaired Response Inhibition and Salience Attribution (iRISA), where the salience of drug cues is postulated to overpower that of other reinforcers with a concomitant decrease in self-control. However, the neural underpinnings of the interaction between the salience of drug cues and inhibitory control in drug addiction remain unclear. We developed a novel stop-signal fMRI task where the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT—a classical inhibitory control measure) was tested under different salience conditions (modulated by drug, food, threat or neutral words) in individuals with cocaine use disorder (CUD; n=26) vs. demographically matched healthy control participants (HC; n=26). Despite similarities in drug cue-related SSRT and valence and arousal word ratings between groups, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) activity was diminished during the successful inhibition of drug versus food cues in CUD, and was correlated with lower frequency of recent use, lower craving, and longer abstinence (Z > 3.1, p < .05 corrected). Results suggest reduced involvement of cognitive control regions (e.g., dlPFC) during inhibitory control under a drug context, relative to an alternative reinforcer, in CUD. Supporting the iRISA model, these results elucidate the direct impact of drug-related cue-reactivity on the neural signature of inhibitory control in drug addiction.
Significance statement Excessive salience attribution to drugs and related cues at the expense of nondrug reinforcers and cues and inhibitory control impairments are hallmark symptoms of drug addiction. Although these neuropsychological functions have been investigated independently, brain representations of their interaction are less clear. We illustrate that, despite matched behavioral performance and valence and arousal ratings, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex—a key node of the cognitive control network also associated with craving—exhibits decreased signaling when successfully inhibiting responses to drug compared to nondrug (food) cues (words) in cocaine-addicted individuals. Modulating salience while taxing self-control permits the study of their combined impact, an ecologically valid examination of the addiction experience. Better understanding inhibitory control under drug cue-reactivity may refine targeted neuromodulatory interventions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by F32DA033088 and K01DA043615 to MAP, 1R01DA041528, R01DA023579, and R21DA034954 to RZG.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai institutional review board approved all study procedures. Participants received full information about the research and provided written consent in accordance with the institutional review board of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Data Availability
Available upon reasonable request as permitted by data sharing policies of the institutional review board.