Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Validation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (Abbott) to screen for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Sint Maarten: a diagnostic accuracy study

Colin King, Eva Lista-de Weever, Maria Henry, Radjin Steingrover, Chérina Fleming, Richard Panneflek, View ORCID ProfileSanne van Kampen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.23.21260526
Colin King
1Collective Prevention Services, Ministry of Health, Social Development and Labor, Sint Maarten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eva Lista-de Weever
1Collective Prevention Services, Ministry of Health, Social Development and Labor, Sint Maarten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Henry
1Collective Prevention Services, Ministry of Health, Social Development and Labor, Sint Maarten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Radjin Steingrover
2Department of Microbiology, St Maarten Laboratory Services, Sint Maarten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chérina Fleming
2Department of Microbiology, St Maarten Laboratory Services, Sint Maarten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Panneflek
3Ministerial Office, Ministry of Health, Social Development and Labor, Sint Maarten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanne van Kampen
1Collective Prevention Services, Ministry of Health, Social Development and Labor, Sint Maarten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sanne van Kampen
  • For correspondence: Sanne.vankampen@sintmaartengov.org
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives Control of the pandemic has required countries to look for other forms of tests besides the gold standard real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Rapid antigen tests (RAT), though less sensitive than RT-PCR, offer the possibility of rapid, inexpensive and early detection of the most infectious COVID-19 cases. Only very few studies have assessed the performance of the Abbott Panbio COVID-19 RAT among asymptomatic people or in Latin America. This study set out to validate this test among people attending the public test street in Sint Maarten, Dutch Caribbean.

Methods People of all ages were recruited from the public COVID-19 test street regardless of COVID-19 symptoms. They received a nasopharyngeal swab for the Abbott Panbio COVID-19 RAT and the RT-PCR Qtower. Diagnostic accuracy of the RAT was compared to the RT-PCR among the overall study population and for subgroups with/without symptoms, with/without close contact and different Ct values.

Results Using a RT-PCR Ct cut-off value of <33, 119 out of 1,411 people (8.4%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Most were asymptomatic (59%). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the RAT was 84% (95% CI 76.2-90.1) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.6-100) respectively. The sensitivity reduced to 67.6% (95% CI: 49.5%, 82.6%) among people without symptoms, regardless of whether they were in close contact with a known COVID-19 case. Sensitivity reduced considerably with a Ct cut-off value of <35.

Conclusions The Abbott Panbio RAT is a valid and cheaper alternative to RT-PCR when used on symptomatic individuals among the general population. However, among asymptomatic people it should not be used as a stand-alone test and negative results should be confirmed with RT-PCR.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Tests were donated by the Ministry of Health, Wellbeing and Sports of the Netherlands, for the purpose of this study. No other external funding was received.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval was requested from the Sint Maarten Medical Center (SMMC) Medical Ethics Committee, who decided that ethical oversight was not required for this study.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The full database is available upon reasonable request from the last author (SvK).

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 24, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Validation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (Abbott) to screen for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Sint Maarten: a diagnostic accuracy study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Validation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (Abbott) to screen for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Sint Maarten: a diagnostic accuracy study
Colin King, Eva Lista-de Weever, Maria Henry, Radjin Steingrover, Chérina Fleming, Richard Panneflek, Sanne van Kampen
medRxiv 2021.09.23.21260526; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.23.21260526
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Validation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (Abbott) to screen for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Sint Maarten: a diagnostic accuracy study
Colin King, Eva Lista-de Weever, Maria Henry, Radjin Steingrover, Chérina Fleming, Richard Panneflek, Sanne van Kampen
medRxiv 2021.09.23.21260526; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.23.21260526

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (230)
  • Allergy and Immunology (507)
  • Anesthesia (111)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1255)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (283)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (537)
  • Epidemiology (10044)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2477)
  • Geriatric Medicine (239)
  • Health Economics (482)
  • Health Informatics (1651)
  • Health Policy (756)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (638)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11886)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (255)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (269)
  • Neurology (2298)
  • Nursing (140)
  • Nutrition (354)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (458)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1255)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (326)
  • Pediatrics (736)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2291)
  • Public and Global Health (4849)
  • Radiology and Imaging (844)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (493)
  • Respiratory Medicine (654)
  • Rheumatology (288)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (271)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (130)
  • Urology (100)