Abstract
Importance Systemic corticosteroids are commonly used in the treatment of severe COVID-19. However, their role in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate disease is less clear. The inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide has shown early promise as a potential treatment for COVID-19.
Objective To determine whether the inhaled steroid ciclesonide is efficacious in patients with high risk for disease progression and can reduce the incidence of long-term COVID-19 symptoms or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2.
Design This was a phase III, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of ciclesonide metered-dose inhaler (MDI) for the treatment of non-hospitalized participants with symptomatic COVID-19 infection. Patients were screened from June 11, 2020 to November 3, 2020.
Setting The study was conducted at 10 centers throughout the U.S. public and private, academic and non-academic sites were represented among the centers.
Participants Participants were randomly assigned to ciclesonide MDI 160 µg per actuation, two actuations twice a day (total daily dose 640 µg) or placebo for 30 days.
Main Outcomes and Measures The primary endpoint was time to alleviation of all COVID-19 related symptoms (cough, dyspnea, chills, feeling feverish, repeated shaking with chills, muscle pain, headache, sore throat, and new loss of taste or smell) by Day 30. Secondary endpoints included subsequent emergency department visits or hospital admissions for reasons attributable to COVID-19.
Results 413 participants were screened and 400 (96.9%) were enrolled and randomized (197 in the ciclesonide arm and 203 in the placebo arm). The median time to alleviation of all COVID-19-related symptoms was 19.0 days (95% CI: 14.0, 21.0) in the ciclesonide arm and 19.0 days (95% CI: 16.0, 23.0) in the placebo arm. There was no difference in resolution of all symptoms by Day 30 (odds ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% CI: 0.84, 1.97). Participants treated with ciclesonide had fewer subsequent emergency department visits or hospital admissions for reasons attributable to COVID-19 (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04 - 0.85). No subjects died during the study.
Conclusions and Relevance Ciclesonide did not achieve the primary efficacy endpoint of time to alleviation of all COVID-19-related symptoms. Future studies of inhaled steroids are needed to explore their efficacy in patients with high risk for disease progression and in reducing the incidence of long-term COVID-19 symptoms or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2.
Question Can the inhaled steroid ciclesonide be efficacious in patients with high risk for disease progression and reduce the incidence of long-term COVID-19 symptoms or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2?
Findings In this randomized clinical trial of 413 patients, ciclesonide did not reduce the time to alleviation of all COVID-19-related symptoms. However, patients treated with ciclesonide had fewer subsequent emergency department visits or hospital admissions for reasons attributable to COVID-19.
Meaning Future studies of inhaled steroids are needed to explore their efficacy in patients with high risk for disease progression and in reducing the incidence of long-term COVID-19 symptoms or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2.
Competing Interest Statement
Michael S. Blaiss, MD: Consultant-Covis Pharmaceutical Wanda Phipatanakul: Genentech, Novartis, Sanofi, Regeneron Consulting for Asthma Therapies Brian Clemency: COVID Research funding from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAIDS) of the National Institutes of Health
Clinical Trial
NCT04377711
Clinical Protocols
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04377711
Funding Statement
The study was sponsored and funded by Covis Pharma GmbH. Covis Pharma GmbH approved the study design, the data collection plan, the data analysis plan, and the decision to publish. Changes to the primary end point were made by the study sponsor in consultation with the study steering committee and the FDA. Research at the primary site was also supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UL1TR001412] (BC, RV) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the NIH [K12HL138052] (BC). The NIH had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, or decision to publish. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Covis Pharma GmbH or the NIH.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Western Institutional Review Board
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article will be available after de-identification. The study protocol will also be available immediately following publication, ending 36 months following article publication.
