Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Training and Development Needs Assessment in a large NIHR Biomedical Research Centre: A Survey

Karen Bell, View ORCID ProfileSyed Ghulam Sarwar Shah, View ORCID ProfileLorna R. Henderson, View ORCID ProfileVasiliki Kiparoglou
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.27.21261708
Karen Bell
1NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah
1NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
2Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah
  • For correspondence: Sarwar.Shah@ouh.nhs.uk
Lorna R. Henderson
1NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
2Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lorna R. Henderson
Vasiliki Kiparoglou
1NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
3Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford. OX2 6GG, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vasiliki Kiparoglou
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objective To assess the training and development needs of researchers and support staff affiliated to the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), one of the largest BRCs in England, and to find out about their past experiences of training.

Design A cross-sectional online questionnaire survey.

Setting and Participants A convenience sample of clinicians, nurses, midwives, allied health professionals, researchers and support staff (N=798) affiliated with the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.

Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the type of training and the secondary outcome measures were the duration, location and timing of training.

Results The response rate was 24%. Of 189 respondents, 114 were women (60%) and 75 men (40%). Respondents included research scientists (31%), medical doctors and dentists (17%), nurses and midwives (16%) and research managers and administrators (16%). Seventy-one percent respondents (n=134) reported attending at least one training activity in the last year and the most wanted training was leadership skills (25%), followed by research grant and fellowship writing (18%) and statistical analysis (16%). An ideal length of a training course was half a day (41%), whole day (25%) and 1-2 hours (22%). The most preferred time of the day for training was morning (60%) and afternoon (22%) and the favoured delivery style of training was an interactive workshop (52%), lecture/talk (25%), online (9%) and practical activities (9%). The main barriers to attending training courses were the lack of time (n-18%), work commitments (13%), and childcare responsibilities (6%).

Conclusions Translational researchers and supporting affiliates want short, easily accessible, interactive training sessions, particularly leadership training skills and grant and fellowship writing. However, practical elements are important too e.g. in a convenient location during the working day. Work commitment is the biggest obstacle in doing training.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • This survey was done to develop and revamp the NIHR Oxford BRC’s training programme that met the training and development needs of our researchers and research support staff.

  • Leadership skills, research grant and fellowship writing, statistical analysis were the most wanted training.

  • The lack of time, work commitments, and childcare responsibilities were the main barriers to attending training courses.

  • Our findings have limited generalisability because the study is based on the responses of participants who are affiliated with only one NIHR BRC; hence, these findings could not be generalised to other NIHR BRCs.

  • These findings might inform the training and development programmes in other NIHR BRCs in the country.

Competing Interest Statement

K. Bell is Training and Education Project Manager, S. G. S. Shah is Senior Research Fellow, L. R. Henderson is Clinical Research Manager and V. Kiparoglou is chief Operating Officer at the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.

Funding Statement

This study was funded/supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (Research Grant No. IS-BRC-1215-20008). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The funders had no role in study design, analysis and interpretation of this study.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was an evaluation of the training and development service. We used the Health Research Authority (HRA) decision tool whether our study required NHS ethics approval. The HRA tool results suggested that our study would not be considered Research; hence, NHS ethics approval was not required and obtained. In addition, our retrospective application for ethics approval was reviewed by the Officer of the Oxford University Medical Sciences Interdivisional Research Ethics Committee, with reference to formally approved process and determined that the study would be classified as evaluation, rather than research, therefore does not require ethical review (CUREC Application: R77595/RE001, date August 26, 2021).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵† Joint First authorships: The authors have informed that they agree that both Karen Bell and Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah completed the intellectual and other work typical of the first author.

Data Availability

All data are reported in this article; hence, no additional data are available.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 29, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Training and Development Needs Assessment in a large NIHR Biomedical Research Centre: A Survey
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Training and Development Needs Assessment in a large NIHR Biomedical Research Centre: A Survey
Karen Bell, Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah, Lorna R. Henderson, Vasiliki Kiparoglou
medRxiv 2021.08.27.21261708; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.27.21261708
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Training and Development Needs Assessment in a large NIHR Biomedical Research Centre: A Survey
Karen Bell, Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah, Lorna R. Henderson, Vasiliki Kiparoglou
medRxiv 2021.08.27.21261708; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.27.21261708

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Medical Education
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (179)
  • Allergy and Immunology (434)
  • Anesthesia (99)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (948)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
  • Dermatology (110)
  • Emergency Medicine (260)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (422)
  • Epidemiology (8987)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (420)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1959)
  • Geriatric Medicine (190)
  • Health Economics (402)
  • Health Informatics (1329)
  • Health Policy (660)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (519)
  • Hematology (212)
  • HIV/AIDS (420)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10809)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (575)
  • Medical Education (200)
  • Medical Ethics (54)
  • Nephrology (222)
  • Neurology (1830)
  • Nursing (110)
  • Nutrition (274)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (353)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (470)
  • Oncology (999)
  • Ophthalmology (298)
  • Orthopedics (111)
  • Otolaryngology (182)
  • Pain Medicine (126)
  • Palliative Medicine (44)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (580)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (276)
  • Primary Care Research (234)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1903)
  • Public and Global Health (4123)
  • Radiology and Imaging (676)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (368)
  • Respiratory Medicine (549)
  • Rheumatology (225)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (191)
  • Sports Medicine (177)
  • Surgery (207)
  • Toxicology (39)
  • Transplantation (109)
  • Urology (81)