ABSTRACT
Background There are calls for research into the mental health consequences of living through the COVID-19 pandemic. Australia’s initial, effective suppression of COVID-19 offers insights into these indirect impacts in the relative absence of the disease. We aimed to describe the mental health experiences of Australian caregivers and children over 12 months, reporting differences related to demographic, socioeconomic and lockdown characteristics.
Methods Data were from Australia’s only nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional survey of caregivers with children (0-17 years). N=2020 caregivers participated in June 2020, N=1434 in September 2020, and N=2508 in July 2021. Caregivers reported their mental health (poor versus not, Kessler-6), and perceived impacts of the pandemic on theirs and their children’s mental health (negative versus none/positive). Data were weighted to approximate population distributions of caregiver age, gender, sole-caregiving, number and ages of children, state/territory and neighbourhood-level disadvantage.
Results Perceived impacts on mental health were more frequently negative for female (versus male) caregivers and older (versus younger) children. Poor caregiver mental health (K6) was more common for families experiencing socioeconomic adversity (especially financial), while perceived impacts were more frequently negative for more socially advantaged groups. Caregivers who experienced the least total lockdown reported similar K6 over time. Otherwise, poor mental health and perceived negative impacts increased over time with increasing total length of lockdown.
Conclusion Despite Australia’s low infection rates, the negative mental health experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic are real and concerning. Addressing poor mental health must be central to ongoing pandemic recovery efforts for families and children.
What is known about this topic?
- The global evidence shows that, for general adult populations, psychological distress peaked in the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic before appearing to improve.
- Less is known about mental health over time of living through the pandemic, especially for caregivers and children. There are urgent calls for research.
- Due to low infection rates, Australia’s experience can provide insight into the mental health impacts of lockdown with minimal compounding harms of the virus.
What this study adds
- From June 2020 to July 2021, Australia’s lockdowns were detrimental for caregiver and child mental health.
- Negative mental health experiences differed by caregiver gender, child age and family socioeconomic characteristics.
- Pandemic response and recovery planning must consider both family mental health and socioeconomic security.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The National Child Health Polls are funded by The Royal Children's Hospital Foundation. This work was supported by The Healthier Wealthier Families project, which was supported by the Helen Macpherson Smith Trust Impact Grant #9523 and The Corella Fund. The Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI) administered research grants for the work and provided infrastructural support (as study sponsor) to its staff but played no role in the conduct or analysis of the research. Research at the MCRI is supported by the Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program. Author AP was supported by The Erdi Foundation Child Health Equity (COVID-19) Scholarship. Author SG was supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (#1155290).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The RCH Human Research Ethics Committee approved this research (February 2020, #35254).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵¶ AR and SG are joint senior authors.
Revisions in response to peer-review.
Data Availability
The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the RCH Child Health Poll, please contact child.healthpoll{at}rch.org.au.
