ABSTRACT
There are urgent calls for research into the mental health consequences of living through the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe caregiver and child mental health over 12 months using Australia’s only nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional survey of caregivers with children (0-17 years). N=2020 caregivers in June 2020, N=1434 in September 2020, and N=2508 in July 2021 provided data. Caregivers rated their mental health (Kessler-6), and impacts of the pandemic on their own and their children’s mental health. Data were weighted using national distribution of age, gender, number of children, state/territory and neighbourhood-level disadvantage. Mental health measures worsened over time. There was an unequal distribution of impacts based on caregiver gender, child age and family socioeconomic characteristics. Negative impacts were more common with current or cumulative lockdown. The indirect impacts of COVID-19 are real and concerning. Mental health must be central to the immediate and ongoing pandemic responses for families and children.
What is known about this topic?
– The global evidence shows that, for general adult populations, psychological distress peaked in the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic before appearing to rebound.
– Less is known about long-term mental health consequences of living through the pandemic, especially for caregivers and children. There are urgent calls for research.
– Due to low infection rates, Australia’s experience can provide insight into the mental health impacts of lockdown without the compounding direct harms of the virus.
What this study adds
– From June 2020 to July 2021, caregivers reported declining mental health and increasing negative mental health impacts of COVID-19 for themselves and their children.
– There was an unequal distribution of mental health impacts based on caregiver gender, child age and family socioeconomic characteristics.
– Lockdown (current or cumulative) was detrimental for caregivers’ and children’s mental health. Pandemic response and recovery planning must consider families’ mental health.
INTRODUCTION
Since the COVID-19 pandemic began over 18 months ago, balancing the direct harms of the virus with the indirect harms of public health restrictions has been a global challenge. Australia enacted some of the strictest public health measures in the world to effectively suppress infection. With just 15% of the population (of 25 million) fully vaccinated by the end of July 2021, stay-at-home orders (‘lockdown’) have been the country’s main measure of disease control.(1) Families with children are some of the most affected by lockdown, required to juggle work, school closures and childcare roles.(2,3) Despite having “greater impact on human activity than any other non-communicable illness”,(2) mental health appears to have been given little consideration in the majority of Australia’s lockdown policies. With future variants and pandemics likely, Australia’s experience offers insight into the mental health impacts of lockdown, without the compounding direct harms of the virus.
In a review of the global mental health evidence from the first year of the pandemic, Aknin et al., reported a peak in adults’ psychological distress in the early months.(2) While many studies reported a decline to pre-pandemic levels by mid-2020,(2) the authors found that mental health inequities were sustained or exacerbated for adults who are young, female, child-rearing, or with fewer socioeconomic resources.(2,3) Despite the pandemic potentially changing the lives of a generation of children, longitudinal data on child mental health are limited.(3) There are urgent calls for research into the “long-term mental health consequences of living through the pandemic”,(2) which prioritises children.(3) To this end, we aimed to describe the impact of the pandemic on caregiver and child mental health using Australia’s only nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional survey of families during the pandemic. We hypothesised that, as the pandemic continued, (i) measures of poor mental health and negative mental health impacts would increase, (ii) there would be an unequal distribution of these impacts based on caregiver gender, child age and family socioeconomic characteristics, and (iii) negative impacts would be more common with current or cumulative lockdown.
METHODS
Design and procedure
The Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH) National Child Health Poll comprises periodic cross-sectional surveys of ∼2000 Australian caregivers of children (0-17 years). Data collection is contracted to the Online Research Unit who draw a nationally representative sample of caregivers from their panel, comprising adults aged 18 years or older, who live in Australia and have internet access. Surveys are administered in sixth grade-equivalent English, anonymous, and respondents are remunerated with points exchangeable for department store gift vouchers. Polls were conducted: 15-23 June 2020, after a first national lockdown (March-May) eased; 15-29 September 2020, when only metropolitan residents of Victoria were in a second, stricter lockdown (July-November); and 20-29 July 2021 (when multiple states/territories were in and out of lockdown (June onwards)). The RCH Human Research Ethics Committee approved this research (February 2020, #35254).
Measures
The surveys captured the demographic, socioeconomic and lockdown characteristics described in Table 1. Caregivers self-reported their anxiety and depression symptoms in the last 4 weeks using the 6-item Kessler-6 (K6), comprising 5-point scales (1 “none” to 5 “all of the time”), dichotomised into clinically significant “poor mental health” (total score 19+) versus not (total score 6-18).(4) Caregivers also rated the impact of the pandemic on their own and each of their children’s mental health, using a 5-point item adapted from the UK Young Minds Matter Study, dichotomized into negative (“small negative/large negative”) versus positive (“none/small positive/large positive”).
Mental health experiences of Australian caregivers and children during the COVID-19 pandemic in weighted proportions
Analysis
Families were assigned the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ (ABS) Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) Index of Relative Disadvantage. To reduce effects of non-response and non-coverage, data were weighted using ABS distributions for age, gender, number of children per family, state/territory and SEIFA. Mental health measures were described for each survey with weighted proportions, overall and by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Child data were adjusted for family cluster.
RESULTS
In June 2020, 2020 of 2697 (75%) caregivers approached provided data for themselves and 3411 children. In September 2020, 1434/1769 (81%) caregivers provided data for 2553 children. In July 2021, 2508/3925 (64%) provided data for 4327 children. The proportions of families in lockdown were 0% (June 2020), 29% (September 2020) and 56% (July 2021). Demographic characteristics were similar across the three surveys. Children’s mean age was 9.1 years (standard deviation (SD) 5.0) and 48% were female. Caregivers’ mean age was 42 years (SD 9.1), 54% were female, and each caregiver cared for 1.7 children on average (SD 0.8). One-quarter were sole caregivers, 57% had a university degree, 24% were born outside Australia, and 22% spoke a language other than English at home. Job/income loss due to COVID-19 was similar, ranging 27-28% across Polls. Low household income increased over Polls (15%, 17%, 19%, respectively), as did being unable to afford essential items (26%, 28%, 33%, respectively).
Table 1 shows that female (compared with male) caregivers more commonly reported poorer mental health (K6) and negative impacts of the pandemic on their mental health. Poor mental health (K6) was more common for caregivers of younger children (pre-school and school age), while negative mental health impacts were more common for older children. Poorer mental health (K6) was more common for all the characteristics traditionally related to lower socioeconomic status (e.g. sole-caregiving, low education, home language other than English, job/income loss, low-income, couldn’t afford essential items, and SEIFA), except for country of birth. In contrast, caregivers with characteristics related to higher socioeconomic status generally reported more negative mental health impacts for themselves and their children, except for job/income loss (and essential items, which showed no consistent differences between categories). After the June 2020 survey, when lockdowns were differentially implemented across states/territories, declining mental health (the K6 and negative impact measures) was evident for current and cumulative experiences of lockdown.
DISCUSSION
In the only nationally representative and repeated cross-sectional survey of Australian families over 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, caregivers self-reported declining mental health and increasing negative mental health impacts for themselves and their children. There were unequal distributions of mental health impacts based on caregiver gender, child age and family socioeconomic characteristics, and negative impacts were more common for families experiencing current or cumulative lockdown.
Our findings align with and extend the Pulse of the Nation (TPTN) survey of Australian parents to August 2020.(5) Notably, this increase in psychological distress is not reflected in general population data.(2,4,5) In our study, substantially more caregivers reported clinically significant levels of mental health symptoms (K6) (average 18%) throughout the pandemic than representative Australian adult data collected pre-pandemic (8% in 2017) or during the first national lockdown (11%).(5)
Study strengths include the large representative samples, high response rates, repeated measures of caregiver and child mental health, and surveying female and male caregivers. Lack of pre-pandemic data limits interpretation of changes over time from pre-pandemic levels. The reliance on caregiver-report, from only one caregiver per household, means the child rating may be biased by caregiver perception.
Australia’s reliance on lockdown has meant caregivers must concurrently parent, work, and facilitate remote schooling at the detriment of their own and their children’s mental health. The COVID-19 infection rate cannot be the only measure of success for Australia. Response and recovery planning must prioritise and incorporate supports for families’ mental health and socioeconomic wellbeing.
Data Availability
The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the RCH Child Health Poll, please contact child.healthpoll@rch.org.au.
COMPETING INTERESTS
None to declare.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUNDING
We thank all families who took part in the Royal Children’s Hospital National Child Health Polls. The National Child Health Polls are funded by The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation. This work was supported by The Healthier Wealthier Families project, which was supported by the Helen Macpherson Smith Trust Impact Grant #9523 and The Corella Fund. The Murdoch Children’s Research Institute (MCRI) administered research grants for the work and provided infrastructural support (as study sponsor) to its staff but played no role in the conduct or analysis of the research. Research at the MCRI is supported by the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program. Author AP was supported by The Erdi Foundation Child Health Equity (COVID-19) Scholarship. Author SG was supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (#1155290).
Footnotes
↵¶ AR and SG are joint senior authors.
