Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Real-world evaluation of AI-driven COVID-19 triage for emergency admissions: External validation & operational assessment of lab-free and high-throughput screening solutions

Andrew A. S. Soltan, Jenny Yang, Ravi Pattanshetty, View ORCID ProfileAlex Novak, Yang Yang, Omid Rohanian, View ORCID ProfileSally Beer, View ORCID ProfileMarina A. Soltan, View ORCID ProfileDavid R. Thickett, Rory Fairhead, CURIAL Translational Collaborative, View ORCID ProfileTingting Zhu, View ORCID ProfileDavid W. Eyre, David A. Clifton
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262376
Andrew A. S. Soltan
1John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
2RDM Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Andrew.Soltan@cardiov.ox.ac.uk
Jenny Yang
3Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Dept. Engineering Science, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ravi Pattanshetty
1John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex Novak
1John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alex Novak
Yang Yang
3Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Dept. Engineering Science, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omid Rohanian
3Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Dept. Engineering Science, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally Beer
1John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sally Beer
Marina A. Soltan
5The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
6Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marina A. Soltan
David R. Thickett
5The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
6Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David R. Thickett
Rory Fairhead
4University of Oxford Medical School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tingting Zhu
3Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Dept. Engineering Science, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tingting Zhu
David W. Eyre
1John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
7Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford
8NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at University of Oxford in partnership with Public Health England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David W. Eyre
David A. Clifton
3Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Dept. Engineering Science, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Uncertainty in patients’ COVID-19 status contributes to treatment delays, nosocomial transmission, and operational pressures in hospitals. However, typical turnaround times for batch-processed laboratory PCR tests remain 12-24h. Although rapid antigen lateral flow testing (LFD) has been widely adopted in UK emergency care settings, sensitivity is limited. We recently demonstrated that AI-driven triage (CURIAL-1.0) allows high-throughput COVID-19 screening using clinical data routinely available within 1h of arrival to hospital. Here we aimed to determine operational and safety improvements over standard-care, performing external/prospective evaluation across four NHS trusts with updated algorithms optimised for generalisability and speed, and deploying a novel lab-free screening pathway in a UK emergency department.

Methods We rationalised predictors in CURIAL-1.0 to optimise separately for generalisability and speed, developing CURIAL-Lab with vital signs and routine laboratory blood predictors (FBC, U&E, LFT, CRP) and CURIAL-Rapide with vital signs and FBC alone. Models were calibrated during training to 90% sensitivity and validated externally for unscheduled admissions to Portsmouth University Hospitals, University Hospitals Birmingham and Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS trusts, and prospectively during the second-wave of the UK COVID-19 epidemic at Oxford University Hospitals (OUH). Predictions were generated using first-performed blood tests and vital signs and compared against confirmatory viral nucleic acid testing. Next, we retrospectively evaluated a novel clinical pathway triaging patients to COVID-19-suspected clinical areas where either model prediction or LFD results were positive, comparing sensitivity and NPV with LFD results alone. Lastly, we deployed CURIAL-Rapide alongside an approved point-of-care FBC analyser (OLO; SightDiagnostics, Israel) to provide lab-free COVID-19 screening in the John Radcliffe Hospital’s Emergency Department (Oxford, UK), as trust-approved service improvement. Our primary improvement outcome was time-to-result availability; secondary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV assessed against a PCR reference standard. We compared CURIAL-Rapide’s performance with clinician triage and LFD results within standard-care.

Results 72,223 patients met eligibility criteria across external and prospective validation sites. Model performance was consistent across trusts (CURIAL-Lab: AUROCs range 0.858-0.881; CURIAL-Rapide 0.836-0.854), with highest sensitivity achieved at Portsmouth University Hospitals (CURIAL-Lab:84.1% [95% Wilson’s score CIs 82.5-85.7]; CURIAL-Rapide:83.5% [81.8 - 85.1]) at specificities of 71.3% (95% Wilson’s score CIs: 70.9 - 71.8) and 63.6% (63.1 - 64.1). For 3,207 patients receiving LFD-triage within routine care for OUH admissions between December 23, 2021 and March 6, 2021, a combined clinical pathway increased sensitivity from 56.9% for LFDs alone (95% CI 51.7-62.0) to 88.2% with CURIAL-Rapide (84.4-91.1; AUROC 0.919) and 85.6% with CURIAL-Lab (81.6-88.9; AUROC 0.925). 520 patients were prospectively enrolled for point-of-care FBC analysis between February 18, 2021 and May 10, 2021, of whom 436 received confirmatory PCR testing within routine care and 10 (2.3%) tested positive. Median time from patient arrival to availability of CURIAL-Rapide result was 45:00 min (32-64), 16 minutes (26.3%) sooner than LFD results (61:00 min, 37-99; log-rank p<0.0001), and 6:52 h (90.2%) sooner than PCR results (7:37 h, 6:05-15:39; p<0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity of CURIAL-Rapide were 87.5% (52.9-97.8) and 85.4% (81.3-88.7), therefore achieving high NPV (99.7%, 98.2-99.9). CURIAL-Rapide correctly excluded COVID-19 for 58.5% of negative patients who were triaged by a clinician to ‘COVID-19-suspected’ (amber) areas.

Impact CURIAL-Lab & CURIAL-Rapide are generalisable, high-throughput screening tests for COVID-19, rapidly excluding the illness with higher NPV than LFDs. CURIAL-Rapide can be used in combination with near-patient FBC analysis for rapid, lab-free screening, and may reduce the number of COVID-19-negative patients triaged to enhanced precautions (‘amber’) clinical areas.

Competing Interest Statement

DWE reports personal fees from Gilead, outside the submitted work; DAC reports personal fees from Oxford University Innovation, personal fees from BioBeats, personal fees from Sensyne Health, outside the submitted work. No other authors report any conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust/University of Oxford Medical & Life Sciences Translational Fund (Award: 0009350) and the Oxford National Institute of Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Campus (BRC). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript. AS is an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellow. DWE is a Robertson Foundation Fellow and an NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Senior Fellow. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR, or the Wellcome Trust.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

NHS Health Research Authority (HRA) approval was granted for the use of routine clinical and microbiology data from Electronic Health Records for development and validation of artificial intelligence models to detect Covid-19 (CURIAL; NHS HRA IRAS ID 281832).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Correction of ORCID of Dr Alex Novak. No textual or other changes have been made to the manuscript or the supplemental files in this revision.

Data & Code Availability

Data from OUH studied here are available from the Infections in Oxfordshire Research Database (https://oxfordbrc.nihr.ac.uk/research-themes-overview/antimicrobial-resistance-and-modernising-microbiology/infections-in-oxfordshire-research-database-iord/), subject to an application meeting the ethical and governance requirements of the Database. Data from UHB, PUH and BH are available on reasonable request to the respective trusts, subject to HRA requirements. Code and supplementary information for this paper are available online alongside publication.

  • Abbreviations

    AI
    Artificial Intelligence
    AUROC
    Area under receiver operating characteristic curve
    BH
    Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    COVID-19
    Coronavirus Disease 2019
    CRP
    C-Reactive Protein
    ED
    Emergency Department
    EHR
    Electronic Health Records
    FBC
    Full Blood Count
    LFT
    Liver Function Test
    LFD
    Rapid antigen lateral flow device
    NHS
    National Health Service
    NPV
    Negative Predictive Value
    OUH
    Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    PCR
    Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
    POCT
    Point of Care Test
    PPV
    Positive Predictive Value
    PUH
    Portsmouth University Hospitals NHS Trust
    SARS-CoV-2
    Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
    SD
    Standard Deviation
    U&Es
    Urea, Creatinine and Electrolytes
    UHB
    University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted November 06, 2021.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Real-world evaluation of AI-driven COVID-19 triage for emergency admissions: External validation & operational assessment of lab-free and high-throughput screening solutions
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Real-world evaluation of AI-driven COVID-19 triage for emergency admissions: External validation & operational assessment of lab-free and high-throughput screening solutions
    Andrew A. S. Soltan, Jenny Yang, Ravi Pattanshetty, Alex Novak, Yang Yang, Omid Rohanian, Sally Beer, Marina A. Soltan, David R. Thickett, Rory Fairhead, CURIAL Translational Collaborative, Tingting Zhu, David W. Eyre, David A. Clifton
    medRxiv 2021.08.24.21262376; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262376
    Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Real-world evaluation of AI-driven COVID-19 triage for emergency admissions: External validation & operational assessment of lab-free and high-throughput screening solutions
    Andrew A. S. Soltan, Jenny Yang, Ravi Pattanshetty, Alex Novak, Yang Yang, Omid Rohanian, Sally Beer, Marina A. Soltan, David R. Thickett, Rory Fairhead, CURIAL Translational Collaborative, Tingting Zhu, David W. Eyre, David A. Clifton
    medRxiv 2021.08.24.21262376; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262376

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Health Informatics
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (228)
    • Allergy and Immunology (506)
    • Anesthesia (110)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (1245)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
    • Dermatology (147)
    • Emergency Medicine (282)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (534)
    • Epidemiology (10032)
    • Forensic Medicine (5)
    • Gastroenterology (500)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2464)
    • Geriatric Medicine (238)
    • Health Economics (480)
    • Health Informatics (1647)
    • Health Policy (754)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (637)
    • Hematology (250)
    • HIV/AIDS (536)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11872)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
    • Medical Education (253)
    • Medical Ethics (75)
    • Nephrology (268)
    • Neurology (2290)
    • Nursing (139)
    • Nutrition (352)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
    • Oncology (1249)
    • Ophthalmology (377)
    • Orthopedics (134)
    • Otolaryngology (226)
    • Pain Medicine (158)
    • Palliative Medicine (50)
    • Pathology (325)
    • Pediatrics (734)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
    • Primary Care Research (282)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2281)
    • Public and Global Health (4843)
    • Radiology and Imaging (843)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (492)
    • Respiratory Medicine (652)
    • Rheumatology (286)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
    • Sports Medicine (227)
    • Surgery (269)
    • Toxicology (44)
    • Transplantation (125)
    • Urology (99)