Abstract
Objectives In 2020, Australia’s successful COVID-19 public health restrictions comprised a national ‘initial lockdown’ (March-May), and ‘ongoing lockdown’ (July-November) for metropolitan Victorian residents only. We evaluated the relationships between ongoing lockdown and family finances and mental health.
Methods In the June and September 2020 Royal Children’s Hospital National Child Health Polls, caregivers of children in Victoria and New South Wales reported: job/income loss; material deprivation (inability to pay for essential items); income-poverty; mental health (Kessler-6); perceived impact on caregiver/child mental health; and caregiver/child coping. Data from N=1207/902 caregivers in June/September were analysed using Difference-in-Difference modelling (New South Wales provided the comparator).
Results During Victoria’s ongoing lockdown, job/income loss increased by 11% (95%CI: 3-18%); Kessler-6 poor mental health by 6% (95%CI: -0.3-12%) and perceived negative mental health impacts by 14% for caregivers (95%CI: 6-23%) and 12% for children (95%CI: 4-20%). Female (versus male) caregivers, metropolitan (versus regional/rural) families, and families with elementary school-aged children (versus pre-/high-school) were most affected.
Conclusions Ongoing lockdown was associated with negative experiences of mental health, employment, and income, but not deprivation or poverty, likely because of government income supplements introduced early in the pandemic. Future lockdowns require planned responses to outbreaks, and evidence-informed financial and mental health supports.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The National Child Health Polls are supported by The Royal Children's Hospital Foundation. This research was supported by the Helen Macpherson Smith Trust Impact Grant #9523. The Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI) administered the research grants for the work and provided infrastructural support (as study sponsor) to its staff but played no role in the conduct or analysis of the research. Research at the MCRI is supported by the Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program. New South Wales authors were supported by the Population Child Health Group at the University of New South Wales, and Best-START South West at the Ingham Institute. Author AP was supported by The Erdi Foundation Child Health Equity Scholarship and The Corella Fund. Author SW was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development Fellowship (#1158954); Author SG was supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (#1155290).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Royal Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee approved the research (HREC 35254).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵§ AR and SG are joint senior authors.
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
This version of the manuscript has been revised to strengthen the rationale and integrate a more explicit discussion of the: -implication of cross-sectional and absence of pre-pandemic data for the interpretation of results; -parallel trend assumption and consequences for a Difference-in-difference strategy; -possible differential effects of the pandemic beyond lockdowns.
Data Availability
The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the RCH Child Health Poll, please contact child.healthpoll{at}rch.org.au.
