ABSTRACT
Background Schizophrenia(SCZ) and bipolar disorder(BD) are both associated with several autoimmune/inflammatory disorders including rheumatoid arthritis(RA). However, a causal association of SCZ and BD on RA is controversial and elusive. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the causal association of SCZ and BD with RA by using the Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.
Methods A two-sample MR(2SMR) study including the inverse-variance weighted(IVW), weighted median, simple mode, weighted mode and MR-Egger methods were performed. We employed summary-level genome-wide association study(GWAS) data including BD and SCZ as exposure and RA as an outcome. We utilized data from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium(PGC) for BD(n= 41,917) and SCZ(n= 33,426), whereas RA GWAS dataset (58,284 individuals) from the European ancestry.
Results We obtained independent (r2 <0.001) 48 and 52 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from BD and SCZ data at genome-wide significance (p <5×10-8), respectively. Next, these SNPs were utilized as instrumental variables(IVs) in 2SMR analysis to explore the causality of BD and SCZ on RA. The two out of five MR methods showed a statistically significant inverse causal association between BD and RA: weighted median method(odds ratio (OR), 0.869, [95% CI, 0.764-0.989]; P= 0.034) and inverse-variance weighted(IVW) method (OR, 0.810, [95% CI, 0.689-0.953]; P= 0.011). However, we did not find any significant association of SCZ with RA (OR, 1.008, [95% CI, 0.931-1.092]; P= 0.829, using the IVW method).
Conclusions These results provide support for an inverse causal association between BD and RA. Further investigation is needed to explain the underlying protective mechanisms in the development of RA.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Not applicable
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The present study used only publicly available summary-level statistics. No individual-level data was analyzed. Ethical approval is therefore not required.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Only publicly available data were used in this study. Data sources and handling of these data are described in the Materials and methods. The codes can be found in R package TwoSampleMR.
