Abstract
Background Mindfulness is promising for individuals with neurological disorders and their caregivers to improve psychological well-being. The potential application of a Langerian mindfulness intervention, focused on attention to variability, however, is still unknown.
Objective To determine the feasibility (usability, satisfaction, and potential effectiveness on psychological well-being) of an online mindfulness intervention for stroke survivors and caregivers.
Methodology Using mixed-methods, 11 stroke survivors and 3 caregivers participated in a 3-week, online, Langerian mindfulness intervention. A semi-structured interview assessed the intervention’s usability and gathered feedback. Self-reported measures about psychological well-being were documented remotely three times (pre, post, one-month follow-up).
Results Qualitatively, participants were highly satisfied with the intervention, reported subjective benefits, but the usability of the online platform was poor. None of the self-reported measures changed over time.
Conclusion This study provided evidence of feasibility of an online Langerian mindfulness intervention in a new population: stroke survivors and caregivers.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT04553679
Funding Statement
The project was supported by the Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute Voucher Program. MD is supported by the Fonds de la Recherche du Quebec Sante.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the IRB from the Health Sciences Campus of the University of Southern California (UP-20-00568) Recruitment was from an existing IRB-approved database, Registry for Aging and Rehabilitation Evaluation-RARE (HS-11-00413). The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Southern California and consistent with the revised Helsinki Declaration. All participants provided informed consent prior to participation.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: None declared.
Research ethics and patient consent: This study was approved by the IRB from the Health Sciences Campus of the University of Southern California (UP-20-00568). Recruitment was from an existing IRB-approved database, Registry for Aging and Rehabilitation Evaluation-RARE (HS-11-00413). The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Southern California and consistent with the revised Helsinki Declaration. All participants provided informed consent prior to participation.
Trial: NCT04553679
Clarifications were presented in the methods and the discussion was reorganized to improve readability.
Data Availability
Additional quotes from participants are available in the supplementary material.
