Increased Autotaxin levels in severe COVID-19, correlating with IL-6 levels, endothelial dysfunction biomarkers, and impaired functions of dendritic cells

Ioanna Nikitopoulou, Dionysios Fanidis, Konstantinos Ntatsoulis, Panagiotis Moulos, George Mpekoulis, Maria Evangelidou, Alice G. Vassiliou, Vasiliki Dimakopoulou, Edison Jahaj, Stamatios Tsipilis, Stylianos E. Orfanos, Ioanna Dimopoulou, Emmanouil Angelakis, Karolina Akinosoglou, Niki Vassilaki, Argyris Tzouvelekis, Anastasia Kotanidou, Vassilis Aidinis
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.30.21261361

Abstract

Autotaxin (ATX; ENPP2) is a secreted lysophospholipase D catalysing the extracellular production of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a pleiotropic signalling phospholipid. Genetic and pharmacologic studies have previously established a pathologic role for ATX and LPA signalling in pulmonary injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. Here, increased ENPP2 mRNA levels were detected in immune cells from nasopharyngeal swab samples of COVID-19 patients, and increased ATX serum levels were found in severe COVID-19 patients. ATX serum levels correlated with the corresponding increased serum levels of IL-6 and endothelial damage biomarkers, suggesting an interplay of the ATX/LPA axis with hyperinflammation and the associated vascular dysfunction in COVID-19. Accordingly, dexamethasone (Dex) treatment of mechanically ventilated patients reduced ATX levels, as shown in two independent cohorts, indicating that the therapeutic benefits of Dex include the suppression of ATX. Moreover, large scale analysis of multiple single cell RNAseq datasets revealed the expression landscape of ENPP2 in COVID-19 and further suggested a role for ATX in the homeostasis of dendritic cells, that exhibit both numerical and functional deficits in COVID-19. Therefore, ATX has likely a multifunctional role in COVID-19 pathogenesis, worth of suggesting that its pharmacological targeting might represent an additional therapeutic option.

Introduction

The leading symptom of COVID-19, beyond cough and fever, is hypoxemia, leading to dyspnea in severe cases, attributed to impaired lung mechanics and/or vasoconstriction (1, 2). Endothelial dysfunction is also a major characteristic of COVID-19 (3), shared with hypertension, diabetes and obesity, the most common comorbidities that are associated with poor prognosis (1, 2). The respiratory epithelial cell damage that follows viral infection and replication stimulate, depending on the underlying genetic and metabolic context, a hyperinflammatory state denominated “cytokine storm” (4). The excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF and IL-6, further induces endothelial damage and lung injury, and its more severe form, Acute Respiratory Distress syndrome (ARDS), that can result to respiratory and/or multi-organ failure and death (5).

A subset of surviving COVID-19 ARDS-like patients will develop a fibroproliferative response characterized by fibroblast accumulation and ECM deposition (6), also evident in postmortem histopathological analysis of the lungs of COVID-19 patients (7). Moreover, many discharged COVID-19 patients present with abnormally pulmonary architecture and functions (8-12), suggesting persisting fibrotic abnormalities, pending long-term follow up studies. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) analysis and transcriptional profiling indicated similarities in expression profiles between Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and COVID-19 (13, 14), while CoV-2 infection has been suggested to stimulate the expression of major pro-fibrotic factors including TGFβ (15). Vice versa, patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) had an increased risk for severe COVID-19 and poor outcomes (ICU admittance, death) following CoV-2 infection (16-18).

Autotaxin (ATX; ENPP2) is a secreted lysophospholipase D that can be found in most biological fluids, including blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), largely responsible for the extracellular production of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a growth factor-like signaling phospholipid. Increased ATX expression and LPA signaling has been reported in cancer as well as in chronic inflammatory diseases (19), including IPF (20, 21). Genetic and pharmacologic studies have further uncovered a therapeutic potential for ATX in IPF (20, 22-24), leading to phase III clinical trials (25). Given the associations of COVID-19 with pulmonary fibrosis, the pro-fibrotic properties of ATX, as well the many reported LPA effects on pulmonary cells and especially the vasculature (26), in this study we explored a possible association of ATX with COVID-19. In this context, we quantified ENPP2 mRNA levels in nasopharyngeal swabs, ATX protein levels in the sera of two cohorts of COVID-19 patients, while we performed a large-scale analysis of recently published scRNAseq COVID-19 datasets.

Materials and Methods

Human patients and samples

All studies were performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration principles. All collected data were anonymized in standardized forms and informed consent was obtained from all individuals or patients’ next-of-kin for severe cases. All available patient personal, epidemiological, clinical, and experimental data are summarized in the corresponding cohorts’ tables (1, 2 and 3), including the appropriate protocol approvals.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

ATX and IL-6 protein levels were quantified with dedicated ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA, and Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific, CA, USA respectively). Measurements were performed in a blinded fashion in triplicates using the Triturus automated analyser (Grifols, Barcelona, Spain). The presented results on ELISA quantification of soluble E-selectin (sE-sel) and P-selectin (sP-sel), ICAM and ANG2 in the same samples, has been reported previously (27).

RNA extraction and Q-RT-PCR

Total RNA extraction from nasopharyngeal swab samples was performed using the MagNA Pure LC Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit using the MagNa Pure LC 2.0 automated nucleic acid purifier (Roche), and viral RNA was quantified with the LightMix Modular SARS-CoV-2 RdRP Kit and the LightCycler Multiplex RNA Virus Master kit (Roche). ENPP2 mRNA levels were quantified with Q-RT-PCR using the SYBR Green-based Luna® Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs)(ENPP2: forward: 5’-ACT CAT GAA GAT GCA CAC AGC -3’; reverse 5’-CGC TCT CAT ATG TAT GCA GG -3’; product length 131 bp). Normalization was performed with the house-keeping gene 14-3-3-zeta polypeptide (YWHAZ), and the relative quantification method 2-ΔΔCt was utilised.

Bulk/ single cell RNA-seq data analysis and mining

The available single cell RNA-seq object was mined for each one of the datasets (Table 1) using Seurat package v3 (28). Marker selection and DEA were performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test (FC>1.2; Bonferroni adj. p< 0.05). For identifying pDCs in the lung data set of (13), DCs – as initially marked– were isolated, and principal components were calculated post to variable genes identification and data scaling using default parameters. The 30 first principal components were used to construct a SNN graph, while clusters were defined with a resolution of 0.8. pDCs were identified using marker genes reported in the cell atlas of (29).

View this table:
Table 1. Increased ENPP2 mRNA expression in nasopharyngeal swabs from COVID-19 patients compared to healthy, non-infected controls.

Nasopharyngeal swab (NS) samples were collected upon routine diagnosis from adult patients tested positive in SARS-CoV2 RNA PCR and showing no or mild COVID-19 clinical symptoms, including cough, sore throat, mild fever below 38oC and loss of smell (positive mild group) or being hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe/critical symptoms, such as respiratory failure, septic shock, acute thrombosis and multiorgan dysfunction (positive severe/critical group). The control group consisted of individuals with a negative SARS-CoV2 RNA PCR.

Preprocessed read count matrices of (30) found here were analyzed using metaseqR2 package (31). More specifically, reads where EDASeq normalized, filtered using default parameters and then PANDORA algorithm was used to combine results of DESeq (32), DESeq2 (33), limma-voom (34), edgeR (35) and ABSSeq (36) methods. DEGs were defined using a FC>1.2 and FDR adj. meta p-value < 0.05.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was assessed with the Prism (GraphPad) software with the appropriate test according to the distribution of values and their complexity, as detailed in each figure legend. Statistical tests used include the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, unpaired t-test, Spearman corelation, 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc correction, Wilcoxon rank sum test-Bonferroni correction, and Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post hoc test.

Results

Increased ENPPp2 mRNA levels in nasopharyngeal swab samples from COVID-19 patients

As viral infections have been reported to stimulate ENPP2 mRNA expression (37, 38), and to examine if CoV-2 infection has similar effects, we first quantified ENPP2 mRNA levels with Q-RT-PCR in nasopharyngeal swab samples (Table 1). A significant increase was found in ENPP2 mRNA expression in mild and severe COVID-19 patients, as compared to non-infected subjects (Fig. 1). Therefore, CoV-2 infection stimulates ENPP2 mRNA expression in the respiratory epithelial or immune cells that compose the nasopharyngeal swab samples.

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Increased ENPP2 mRNA expression in nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients with mild or severe/critical COVID-19.

(A). ENP2 mRNA values (mean 2-Mct) from the two groups of patients (n=21 per group) and the control group (n=21). The horizontal dotted line indicates the optimal threshold value (cut-off). Data are represented as box plots; line in the middle, median; box edges, 25th to 75th centiles; whiskers, range of values. p values were calculated with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. (B). ROC curves were generated after merging the results for the two positive groups (mild and severe/critical) and AUC, 95% CI, p values and cut-off points with their specificity and sensitivity were calculated (table). Positive mild versus negative samples: * p= 4⨯10-6, Positive critical/severe versus negative samples: ** p= 2.92⨯10-7.

Increased serum ATX protein levels in severe COVID-19 patients

To examine if systemic levels of ATX are possibly increased upon COVID-19, ATX was quantified with an ELISA kit in the serum of COVID-19 patients hospitalised at the Evangelismos University Hospital (Table 2). The cohort consisted of patients with mild symptoms, hospitalised in the COVID-19 WARD (n=47; no Dex treatment), as well as of patients with severe symptoms, hospitalised in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU); ICU patients were further separated in patients receiving Dexamethazone (Dex) treatment (n=37) or not (NO Dex; n=32). A large proportion of patients suffered from comorbidities, and were receiving a variety of medications prior to admission, while COVID-19-targeted treatment included azithromycin, chloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir in different combinations per WHO recommendations at that time (Table 2). In comparison with WARD patients, ICU patients were hypoxemic (low ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen; PaO2/FiO2), lymphopenic (low lymphocyte numbers), and had increased LDH levels (Table 2), all three suggested as disease severity markers.

View this table:
Table 2. Clinical characteristics and laboratory data of COVID-19 patients hospitalized at the Evangelismos general hospital.

Serum samples were collected with standardised procedures from COVID-19 patients admitted to the specialized COVID-19 WARD or to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Evangelismos General Hospital from 24 March to 2 November 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed by real-time reverse transcription PCR in nasopharyngeal swabs. The study was approved by the Evangelismos Hospital Research Ethics Committee (# 170/24-4-2020).

Increased ATX serum concentrations were discovered in ICU patients (not receiving Dex) as compared with WARD patients (Fig. 2A), suggesting a possible association of ATX with disease severity. However, no substantial, statistically significant corelation was observed independently with the applicable severity markers (data not shown and Table 2); no statistically significant differences of ATX levels between the sex or the comorbidities of COVID-19 patients was detected either (Fig. S1). However and most importantly, ATX levels corelated significantly with IL-6 levels in the serum of ICU patients (not receiving Dex)(Fig. 2B), suggesting a possible interplay of ATX/LPA with the cytokine storm in COVID-19.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Increased serum ATX protein levels in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU), corelating with increased IL-6 levels.

(A). ATX protein levels were measured, with a commercial ELISA kit, in the sera of COVID-19 patients hospitalized (without Dex treatment) in the COVID-19 Ward (n=47) or the ICU (n=37) of Evangelismos hospital. Statistical significance, given the normal distribution of values, was assessed with an unpaired t-test. ****denotes p<0,0001. (B). ATX serum levels correlated with serum IL-6 levels (n=29), as assessed with Spearman correlation (rs).

ICU non-survivors in this cohort had higher levels of the endothelial dysfunction markers soluble E-selectin (sE-sel), soluble P-selectin (sP-sel), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) and angiopoietin 2 (ANG-2) when compared to survivors, as recently reported using a subset of the current Evangelismos cohort samples (27). Interestingly, the increased ATX protein levels correlated with the increased protein levels of sEsel and sICAM (Fig. S2) in ICU patients, suggesting a role for ATX/LPA in COVID-19 induced endothelial dysfunction.

Dex therapeutic effects in COVID-19 include the suppression of ATX serum levels

The first line of therapy for many inflammatory diseases as well as respiratory infections is Dex, that lowers the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, and that has been proven effective in COVID-19 patients requiring, invasive or not, oxygenation (39, 40). Therefore, we next examined ATX serum levels in intubated, or not, ICU patients receiving, or not, Dex treatment. Remarkably, Dex treatment was discovered to potently suppress ATX serum levels in ventilated patients (Fig. 3A), while intubated ICU patients receiving no Dex presented with the highest overall ATX serum levels. Identical results were obtained in another cohort of ICU patients from the University hospital of Patras (Table 3)(Fig. 3B), indicating that the therapeutic benefits of Dex include the suppression of ATX serum levels.

View this table:
Table 3. Clinical characteristics and laboratory data of COVID-19 patients hospitalized at the ICU of the University Hospital of Patras.

Serum samples were collected with standardised procedures from COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital of Patras from April 24th to December 6th 2020. The study was approved by the University Hospital of Patras Research Ethics Committee (# 216/08-05-2020).

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Dexamethasone therapeutic effects include the suppression of ATX serum levels.

ATX protein levels were measured, with a commercial ELISA kit in the serum of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the ICU of (A, C) the Evangelismos or (B, D) the Patras hospitals. The measurements in the Dex groups in 3A and C, are the same as in Figure 2A. Statistical significance, given the normal distribution of values, was assessed with 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc correction. *, **, ***, **** denotes p<0.05, p< 0.01, p<0.001 and p<0.0001 respectively.

Moreover, ATX levels in ICU patients not receiving Dex treatment negatively affected survival, and non-surviving ICU patients receiving no Dex presented with the higher overall ATX serum levels (Fig. 3 C,D).

The ENPP2 expression landscape in COVID-19

To identify possible ATX expressing cells in the nasopharyngeal swab (NS) samples (Fig. 1), peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) in the circulation (Figs. 2, 3), as well as in BALF and lung tissue cells, we re-analysed and mined several scRNAseq datasets of COVID-19 patients and healthy controls, from recent high impact studies (Table 1), collectively interrogating the gene expression of more than 106 cells; cell clustering and naming followed that of the original analyses, which both varied between studies/datasets.

In NS cells, ATX is mainly expressed by natural killer cells (NKs) and monocyte-derived macrophages (MoAM)(Figs. 4A and S3A), as detected in two NS datasets (Table 1). In the circulation, and in both PBMCs datasets (Table 1), ENPP2 expression was mainly detected, surprisingly, in plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs; Figs 4B and S3B). In BALF cells (Table 1), ENPP2 expression was also mainly detected in pDCs, as well as MoAMs (Figs 4C and S3C). In lung tissue (Table 1), ENPP2 was found to be primarily expressed in arterial and mesothelial cells, as well as in cells of the monocytic lineage (Fig. 4D and S3D). A similar lung tissue profile was also detected (Fig. S3E) in an IPF scRNAseq dataset (Table 1), extending the similarities of pathogenic mechanisms between IPF and COVID-19 and supporting a common role for ATX.

Figure 4.
Figure 4. The ENPP2 expression landscape in COVID-19.

ENPP2 expression has been assessed in four datasets of COVID-19/healthy control datasets, each representing a different sampling site (Table 1). UMAP plots (on the left) depict the cellular composition of these sites, while dot plots (on the right) the expression pattern of ENPP2 in the detected cell types. Marker genes, denoted by stars, were detected using a Wilcoxon rank sum test; FC>1.2, Bonferroni corrected p<0.05; ***denotes p< 0.01) (PMIDs: A. 32591762; B. 32810438; C. 32398875; D. 33257409).

A role for ATX in the homeostasis of dendritic cells

Given the ENPP2 expression from monocytic cells and especially pDCs, we next interrogated ENNP2 mRNA levels specifically in pDCs from COVID-19 patients in comparison with control samples, subsets of the datasets analysed in Figure 4. Confined by the limited numbers of lung pDCs, as well as the detected genes per cell and the relatively low expression levels of ENPP2, the analysis indicated a statistically significant overexpression of ENPP2 in COVID-19 circulating pDCs (Fig. 5B). Noteworthy, DCs are the highest ENPP2 expressing immune cells during healthy conditions, as identified upon querying a large-scale RNAseq data set interrogating gene expression of 28 immune cell types (79 healthy volunteers and 337 patients from 10 immune-related diseases)(30)(Fig. S4A). Similar analysis indicated that the main LPA receptor expressed by DCs is LPAR2 (Fig. S4B), which has been suggested to convey anti-inflammatory LPA signals to DCs (41). Furthermore, increased ENPP2 mRNA expression was detected in pDCs from patients with systemic lupus erythematosous (SLE), adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) than in DCs from healthy volunteers (Fig. S4C), suggesting that overexpression of ENPP2 in pDCs may be a common theme in inflammation.

Figure 5.
Figure 5. ENPP2 mRNA expression is upregulated in peripheral pDCs and lung tissue DCs of COVID-19 patients.

(A-D). Differential expression of ENPP2 in pDCs of COVID-19 patients versus healthy controls. ENPP2 mRNA expression was found up-regulated in peripheral (B) pDCs of COVID-19 patients. (E). Differential expression analysis indicates increased ENPP2 mRNA expression in COVID-19 lung tissue DCs than healthy control ones. (F). Venn diagrams of deregulated genes in lung DCs. Differential expression was performed using a Wilcoxon rank sum test; FC>1.2 and Bonferroni corrected p<0.05; ***denotes Bonferroni adjusted p< 0.01) (PMIDs: A. 32591762; B. 32810438; C. 32398875; D. 33257409).

Finally, and to gain mechanistic insights into the possible role of ATX in DCs homeostasis upon COVID-19, we first analysed differential gene expression in COVID-19 DCs (as pDCs were too few), from the only COVID-19 lung dataset (13) allowing such analysis, as well as in ENPP2-expressing (ENPP2+) DCs (Table S5). Increased ENPP2 expression was also detected in all lung DCs (Fig. 5E), while comparative analysis (Venn diagrams Fig. 5F) highlighted two genes upregulated in ENPP2+ COVID-19 DCs, transmembrane protein 176B (TMEM176B) and CD1a, that have been both proposed as DC differentiation and/or maturation markers, suggesting that ENPP2 expression may modulate DC homeostasis.

Discussion

Previous studies have shown that HCV, HIV and HBV viral increase Enpp2 mRNA expression in infected cells and/or to raise systemic ATX levels (42-44). As shown here, increased ENPP2 mRNA expression was detected in nasopharyngeal swab samples from COVID-19 patients in comparison to non-infected healthy controls (Fig. 1), while scRNAseq re-analysis revealed that the highest ENPP2 expressing cells in swabs are immune cells (Figs. 5A and S5A), suggesting that CoV-2 infection stimulates ENPP2 expression from immune cells in the nasopharynx. LPA, the enzymatic product of ATX and its effector molecule, has been shown to directly affect HCV viral infection and replication (37, 38), suggesting that a similar autocrine mode of action maybe in play in COVID-19, where ATX produced by the infected host cell would stimulate local LPA production, in turn facilitating viral entry and replication.

Increased serum ATX protein have been reported in cancer, liver diseases, as well as respiratory diseases including asthma and pulmonary fibrosis (19, 45), while increased levels of serum ATX were recently reported in ARDS (46). Here, increased ATX sera levels were detected in ICU-hospitalised COVID-19 patients (receiving no Dex treatment) compared to patients with less severe disease (Fig. 2), suggesting increased ATX expression as an additional commonality of ARDS and COVID-19.

The origin of serum ATX is not completely deciphered; however, >40% of serum constitutively active ATX has been suggested to originate from the adipose tissue (47), which was shown to be able to modulate the pathophysiology of distant metabolically active organs (48, 49). Moreover, serum ATX has been reported to correlate with insulin resistance in older humans with obesity (50), while mice with heterozygous Enpp2 deficiency were protected from HFD-induced obesity and systemic insulin resistance (49). Several additional reports have incriminated the ATX/LPA axis in the regulation of glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance (reviewed in (51)), among the main comorbidities of COVID-19, suggesting adipose tissue-derived ATX as a possible pathologic link between obesity and COVID-19.

An additional possible source of serum ATX in disease states, beyond the adipose tissue, is the liver. Increased ATX expression has been reported in chronic liver diseases of different aetiologies, associated with shorter overall survival (37), while the genetic deletion of ATX from hepatocytes (37), or as discussed above adipocytes (48), attenuated liver steatosis and fibrosis. Therefore, increased levels of serum ATX are expected upon liver damage, whereas aberrant liver functions have been reported in COVID-19, irrespectively of pre-existing liver disease (52). On the other hand, cirrhotic patients have high rates of liver failure and death from respiratory failure upon CoV-2 infection, attributed to increased systemic inflammation, immune dysfunction, and vasculopathy (52). Therefore, ATX could be also a pathologic link between liver damage and COVID-19.

Plasma ATX levels have been recently reported to corelate with IL-6 levels in severe ARDS patients (46), as well as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients (53), as shown here in the serum of ICU COVID-19 patients (Fig. 2). Increased serum IL-6 levels have been reported in COVID-19 patients corelating with the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia and mortality risk (54), or respiratory failure and the need for mechanical ventilation (55). Meta-analyses of published studies on COVID-19 laboratory findings indicated that serum levels of IL-6 were among the most predictive biomarkers (56, 57). Interestingly, components of the COVID-19 cytokine storm (IL-6, TNF and IL-1β) have been suggested to stimulate ATX expression and/or activity in different cell types, while, vice versa, LPA has been reported to stimulate TNF and IL-6 expression in different contexts (22), suggesting a possible interplay of the COVID-19 cytokine storm and the ATX/LPA axis.

Dex treatment, a potent suppressor of systemic inflammation including IL-6, has been shown to reduce mortality in hospitalised COVID-19 patients under oxygen supplementation treatment or mechanical ventilation (39, 40). Dex treatment has been shown to decrease ATX (as well as IL-6) levels in the mouse adipose tissue and plasma (58), as well as in irradiated mammary fat pad (59). As shown here (Fig. 3), Dex treatment of mechanically ventilated patients drastically reduced their ATX serum levels, indicating that the therapeutic effects of Dex in COVID-19 include the suppression of ATX serum levels.

An essential role for ATX/LPA in embryonic vasculature has been well established through genetic studies in both mice (60-62) and zebrafish (63). In adult mice, Enpp2 has been discovered as a high priority candidate gene for pulmonary hemorrhage upon SARS/MERS-CoV infection (64, 65), while vascular leak has been suggested to be among the main pathological effects of ATX/LPA in pulmonary pathophysiology and fibrosis in mice (21, 22). As shown here, ENPP2 mRNA expression in the COVID-19 lung tissue was detected mainly in artery cells (Fig. 4D, S3D), while high ATX expression from ECs in HEVs in lymph nodes has been previously reported (66). Moreover, and in the same context, a plethora of LPA in vitro effects on endothelial cells have been suggested, with some controversy, including endothelial permeability, leukocyte adhesion, and cytokine expression, as previously reported in detail (26). Among them, LPA has been suggested to stimulate the expression of E-Sel from human aortic endothelial cells (67-69), a cell surface adhesion molecule regulating interaction with leukocytes. As shown here, ATX serum levels corelated with the corresponding sE-sel and sICAM serum levels (Fig. S2), which has been independently associated, in the same samples, with mortality of COVID-19 ICU patients (27), suggesting that ATX/LPA effects in COVID-19 may also include vasculopathy.

IPF macrophages have been previously shown to stain for ATX, and conditional genetic deletion of ATX from macrophages in mice, reduced BALF ATX levels and disease severity in modeled pulmonary fibrosis (20). scRNAseq analysis of BALF cells from COVID-19 patients, where macrophages predominate, indicated that ENPP2 mRNA expression was detected in different macrophage subpopulations (Fig. 4C/UMAP, S3C/UMAP), where it could modulate their maturation in an autocrine mode via LPA (70-72). LPA has been also suggested to stimulate, in vitro, the conversion of monocytes to DCs (41, 73, 74). Interestingly, ENPP2 mRNA expression was mainly detected in pDCs among all PBMCs and BALF cells in COVID-19 (Figs. 4B,C, S3B,C). pDCs are the principal interferon (IFN) type I producing cells in the human blood and can be rapidly recruited to inflamed sites (75). Circulating and lung pDCs have been shown to be diminished in COVID-19 (76, 77), while IFN type I responses were highly impaired (78, 79). ENPP2 mRNA expression was found upregulated in circulating pDCs (Fig. 5B), and lung DCs (Fig. 5E) from COVID-19 patients in comparison to cells from healthy controls. pDC development and homeostasis are regulated by the transcription TCF4 (80), which has been reported to get modulated by LPA in colon cancer cells (81), suggesting that ENPP2 expression from pDCs and the local production of LPA modulates, in an autocrine way, pDC development and homeostasis. The hypothesis is further supported from the genes that have been discovered, to be increased in COVID-19 DCs, possibly regulated by ENPP2 (Fig. 5E). CD1a binds and presents to T-cells lipid metabolites and PLA2-synthesised fatty acid neoantigens and has been found to be expressed in immature DCs in mucosal surfaces, including the bronchus (82-84). Tmem176B has been also associated with an immature state of dendritic cells (85, 86), suggesting that ENPP2 expression from COVID-19 pDCs, via LPA, delays their maturation. Although LPA signals in most cell types are considered pro-inflammatory and pro-surviving, an anti-inflammatory role of LPA, via LPAR2 -the main subtype expressed in DCs (Fig. S4B), has been proposed previously for DCs (41), further supporting a possible role for ATX/LPA in supressing DC responses.

Taken together, a role for ATX/LPA in COVID-19 pathogenesis seems likely, possibly as a component of the cytokine storm perpetuating hyperinflammation and stimulating endothelial damage, as well as a regulator of the mononuclear phagocyte system and a suppressor of (p)DCs responses, non-withstanding its established role in fibrosis. Dex treatment in mechanically ventilated patients decreased ATX levels, indicating that the therapeutic effects of Dex in COVID-19 include the suppression of the ATX/LPA axis and that ATX levels can be druggable. Additional large-scale studies of serum ATX levels, e.g. retrospectively from recent clinical trials (a-IL-6R, Dex, antiviral), will be required to possibly establish ATX as a diagnostic/prognostic marker. Moreover, perspective FACS analysis of BALF DCs from COVID-19 patients will be necessary to validate the scRNAseq -based hypotheses data on DC homeostasis. More importantly and given that COVID-19 and IPF share risk factors for disease severity, such as age/sex and comorbidities, existing and developing anti-fibrotic therapies have been suggested as additional therapeutic opportunities in COVID-19 (87-89). One of the novel candidates target ATX, is currently in clinical trials phase III in IPF (90). Given the multiple possible roles of ATX in COVID-19, ATX inhibition could offer additional therapeutic options in COVID-19 management, both during and after hospitalization.

Data Availability

All data are reported within the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been co-financed by the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call Research – Create – Innovate (project code: T1EDK-0049; recipient VA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author contributions

IN performed all ELISAs. IN, KN and PM performed all related statistical analyses. DF analyzed bulk and sc-RNAseq data. GM and ME performed Q-RT-PCRs on nasopharyngeal swabs and analyzed data with EA and NV. AV, VD, EJ and ST collected clinical samples and compiled clinical data under the supervision and guidance of SO, ID and KA. NV, AT, AK and VA designed the study and supervised analyses. VA wrote the paper, which was edited and critically commented by all authors, that all approved the reported conclusions.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

View this table:
Table S1.

scRNA-seq datasets used in the study

Table S2. Differential expression analysis of dendritic cells (DCs) in COVID-19.

The corresponding spreadsheets can be found at: https://www.dropbox.com/s/zdq0z0ikxrraj37/Table%20S2.xlsx?dl=0

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Alexandros Zacharis and Nikolaos Athanasiou for sample collection.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, Shi Z-L. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2020.
  2. 2.↵
    Osuchowski MF, Winkler MS, Skirecki T, Cajander S, Shankar-Hari M, Lachmann G, et al. The COVID-19 puzzle: deciphering pathophysiology and phenotypes of a new disease entity. Lancet Respir Med. 2021.
  3. 3.↵
    Huertas A, Montani D, Savale L, Pichon J, Tu L, Parent F, et al. Endothelial cell dysfunction: a major player in SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19)? Eur Respir J. 2020;56(1).
  4. 4.↵
    Fajgenbaum DC, June CH. Cytokine Storm. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(23):2255–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, Arabi YM, Beitler JR, Mercat A, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2019;5(1):18.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Burnham EL, Janssen WJ, Riches DW, Moss M, Downey GP. The fibroproliferative response in acute respiratory distress syndrome: mechanisms and clinical significance. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(1):276–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Maiese A, Manetti AC, La Russa R, Di Paolo M, Turillazzi E, Frati P, et al. Autopsy findings in COVID-19-related deaths: a literature review. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2020:1–18.
  8. 8.↵
    Mo X, Jian W, Su Z, Chen M, Peng H, Peng P, et al. Abnormal pulmonary function in COVID-19 patients at time of hospital discharge. The European respiratory journal. 2020;55(6).
  9. 9.
    Frija-Masson J, Debray MP, Gilbert M, Lescure FX, Travert F, Borie R, et al. Functional characteristics of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia at 30 days post-infection. The European respiratory journal. 2020;56(2).
  10. 10.
    Gassel RJJv, Bels JLM, Raafs A, Bussel BCTv, Poll MCGvd, Simons SO, et al. High Prevalence of Pulmonary Sequelae at 3 Months after Hospital Discharge in Mechanically Ventilated Survivors of COVID-19. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2021;203(3):371–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.
    George PM, Barratt SL, Condliffe R, Desai SR, Devaraj A, Forrest I, et al. Respiratory follow-up of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Thorax. 2020;75(11):1009–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Myall KJ, Mukherjee B, Castanheira AM, Lam JL, Benedetti G, Mak SM, et al. Persistent Post-COVID-19 Interstitial Lung Disease. An Observational Study of Corticosteroid Treatment. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(5):799–806.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Bharat A, Querrey M, Markov NS, Kim S, Kurihara C, Garza-Castillon R, et al. Lung transplantation for patients with severe COVID-19. Science Translational Medicine. 2020;12(574):eabe4282.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Wu M, Chen Y, Xia H, Wang C, Tan CY, Cai X, et al. Transcriptional and proteomic insights into the host response in fatal COVID-19 cases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020;117(45):28336–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    McDonald LT. Healing after COVID-19: are survivors at risk for pulmonary fibrosis? Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2021;320(2):L257–l65.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Esposito AJ, Menon AA, Ghosh AJ, Putman RK, Fredenburgh LE, El-Chemaly SY, et al. Increased Odds of Death for Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease and COVID-19: A Case-Control Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(12):1710–3.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.
    Drake TM, Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Quint JK, Adamali H, Agnew S, et al. Outcome of Hospitalization for COVID-19 in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease. An International Multicenter Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(12):1656–65.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Beltramo G, Cottenet J, Mariet AS, Georges M, Piroth L, Tubert-Bitter P, et al. Chronic respiratory diseases are predictors of severe outcome in COVID-19 hospitalised patients: a nationwide study. Eur Respir J. 2021.
  19. 19.↵
    Magkrioti C, Galaris A, Kanellopoulou P, Stylianaki EA, Kaffe E, Aidinis V. Autotaxin and chronic inflammatory diseases. J Autoimmun. 2019;104:102327.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Oikonomou N, Mouratis MA, Tzouvelekis A, Kaffe E, Valavanis C, Vilaras G, et al. Pulmonary autotaxin expression contributes to the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology. 2012;47(5):566–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Tager AM, LaCamera P, Shea BS, Campanella GS, Selman M, Zhao Z, et al. The lysophosphatidic acid receptor LPA1 links pulmonary fibrosis to lung injury by mediating fibroblast recruitment and vascular leak. Nature medicine. 2008;14(1):45–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Ninou I, Magkrioti C, Aidinis V. Autotaxin in Pathophysiology and Pulmonary Fibrosis. Frontiers in medicine. 2018;5:180.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.
    Ninou I, Kaffe E, Muller S, Budd DC, Stevenson CS, Ullmer C, et al. Pharmacologic targeting of the ATX/LPA axis attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2018;52:32–40.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Tager AM. Autotaxin emerges as a therapeutic target for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: limiting fibrosis by limiting lysophosphatidic acid synthesis. American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology. 2012;47(5):563–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Maher TM, Kreuter M, Lederer DJ, Brown KK, Wuyts W, Verbruggen N, et al. Rationale, design and objectives of two phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled studies of GLPG1690, a novel autotaxin inhibitor, in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (ISABELA 1 and 2). BMJ Open Respiratory Research. 2019;6(1):e000422.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Magkrioti C, Aidinis V. ATX and LPA signalling in lung pathophysiology. World J Respirol. 2013;3(3):77–103.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Vassiliou AG, Keskinidou C, Jahaj E, Gallos P, Dimopoulou I, Kotanidou A, et al. ICU Admission Levels of Endothelial Biomarkers as Predictors of Mortality in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients. Cells. 2021;10(1).
  28. 28.↵
    Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, Hafemeister C, Papalexi E, Mauck WM, III., et al. Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data. Cell. 2019;177(7):1888-902.e21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Travaglini KJ, Nabhan AN, Penland L, Sinha R, Gillich A, Sit RV, et al. A molecular cell atlas of the human lung from single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature. 2020;587(7835):619–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Ota M, Nagafuchi Y, Hatano H, Ishigaki K, Terao C, Takeshima Y, et al. Dynamic landscape of immune cell-specific gene regulation in immune-mediated diseases. Cell. 2021;184(11):3006-21.e17.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Fanidis D, Moulos P. Integrative, normalization-insusceptible statistical analysis of RNA-Seq data, with improved differential expression and unbiased downstream functional analysis. Brief Bioinform. 2020.
  32. 32.↵
    Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106–R.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):1–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;43(7):e47–e.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Smyth GK. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(10):4288–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Yang W, Rosenstiel PC, Schulenburg H. ABSSeq: A new RNA-Seq analysis method based on modelling absolute expression differences. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    Kaffe E, Katsifa A, Xylourgidis N, Ninou I, Zannikou M, Harokopos V, et al. Hepatocyte autotaxin expression promotes liver fibrosis and cancer. Hepatology. 2017;65(4):1369–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Farquhar MJ, Humphreys IS, Rudge SA, Wilson GK, Bhattacharya B, Ciaccia M, et al. Autotaxin-lysophosphatidic acid receptor signalling regulates hepatitis C virus replication. J Hepatol. 2017.
  39. 39.↵
    Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L, et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):693–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    Sterne JAC, Murthy S, Diaz JV, Slutsky AS, Villar J, Angus DC, et al. Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-analysis. Jama. 2020;324(13):1330–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    Emo J, Meednu N, Chapman TJ, Rezaee F, Balys M, Randall T, et al. Lpa2 Is a Negative Regulator of Both Dendritic Cell Activation and Murine Models of Allergic Lung Inflammation. J Immunol. 2012.
  42. 42.↵
    Kostadinova L, Shive CL, Anthony DD. Elevated Autotaxin and LPA Levels During Chronic Viral Hepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associate with Systemic Immune Activation. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(12).
  43. 43.
    Joshita S, Ichikawa Y, Umemura T, Usami Y, Sugiura A, Shibata S, et al. Serum autotaxin is a useful liver fibrosis marker in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatol Res. 2018;48(4):275–85.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    Kaffe E, Katsifa A, Xylourgidis N, Ninou I, Zannikou M, Harokopos V, et al. Hepatocyte autotaxin expression promotes liver fibrosis and cancer. 2017;65(4):1369–83.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    Barbayianni E, Kaffe E, Aidinis V, Kokotos G. Autotaxin, a secreted lysophospholipase D, as a promising therapeutic target in chronic inflammation and cancer. Progress in lipid research. 2015;58:76–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Gao L, Li X, Wang H, Liao Y, Zhou Y, Wang K, et al. Autotaxin levels in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid are associated with inflammatory and fibrotic biomarkers and the clinical outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Journal of Intensive Care. 2021;9(1):44.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    Dusaulcy R, Rancoule C, Gres S, Wanecq E, Colom A, Guigne C, et al. Adipose-specific disruption of autotaxin enhances nutritional fattening and reduces plasma lysophosphatidic acid. J Lipid Res. 2011;52(6):1247–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    Brandon JA, Kraemer M, Vandra J, Halder S, Ubele M, Morris AJ, et al. Adipose-derived autotaxin regulates inflammation and steatosis associated with diet-induced obesity. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0208099.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.↵
    D’Souza K, Nzirorera C, Cowie AM, Varghese GP, Trivedi P, Eichmann TO, et al. Autotaxin-LPA signaling contributes to obesity-induced insulin resistance in muscle and impairs mitochondrial metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2018;59(10):1805–17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    Reeves VL, Trybula JS, Wills RC, Goodpaster BH, Dube JJ, Kienesberger PC, et al. Serum Autotaxin/ENPP2 correlates with insulin resistance in older humans with obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(12):2371–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. 51.↵
    D’Souza K, Paramel GV, Kienesberger PC. Lysophosphatidic Acid Signaling in Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Nutrients. 2018;10(4).
  52. 52.↵
    Marjot T, Webb GJ, Barritt AS, Moon AM, Stamataki Z, Wong VW, et al. COVID-19 and liver disease: mechanistic and clinical perspectives. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2021;18(5):348–64.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    Trovato FM, Zia R, Napoli S, Wolfer K, Huang X, Morgan PE, et al. Dysregulation of the LPC-ATX-LPA axis in ACLF is associated with mortality and systemic inflammation via LPA-dependent monocyte activation. Hepatology. 2021.
  54. 54.↵
    Guirao JJ, Cabrera CM, Jiménez N, Rincón L, Urra JM. High serum IL-6 values increase the risk of mortality and the severity of pneumonia in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Mol Immunol. 2020;128:64–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.↵
    Herold T, Jurinovic V, Arnreich C, Lipworth BJ, Hellmuth JC, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, et al. Elevated levels of IL-6 and CRP predict the need for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146(1):128-36.e4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    Zhang Z-L, Hou Y-L, Li D-T, Li F-Z. xLaboratory findings of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 2020;80(6):441–7.
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.↵
    Ulhaq ZS, Soraya GV. Interleukin-6 as a potential biomarker of COVID-19 progression. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses. 2020;50(4):382–3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    Meng G, Tang X, Yang Z, Zhao Y, Curtis JM, McMullen TPW, et al. Dexamethasone decreases the autotaxin-lysophosphatidate-inflammatory axis in adipose tissue: implications for the metabolic syndrome and breast cancer. Faseb j. 2018:fj201801226R.
  59. 59.↵
    Meng G, Wuest M, Tang X, Dufour J, McMullen TPW, Wuest F, et al. Dexamethasone Attenuates X-Ray-Induced Activation of the Autotaxin-Lysophosphatidate-Inflammatory Cycle in Breast Tissue and Subsequent Breast Fibrosis. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(4).
  60. 60.↵
    Tanaka M, Okudaira S, Kishi Y, Ohkawa R, Iseki S, Ota M, et al. Autotaxin stabilizes blood vessels and is required for embryonic vasculature by producing lysophosphatidic acid. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(35):25822–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.
    van Meeteren LA, Ruurs P, Stortelers C, Bouwman P, van Rooijen MA, Pradere JP, et al. Autotaxin, a secreted lysophospholipase D, is essential for blood vessel formation during development. Molecular and cellular biology. 2006;26(13):5015–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    Fotopoulou S, Oikonomou N, Grigorieva E, Nikitopoulou I, Paparountas T, Thanassopoulou A, et al. ATX expression and LPA signalling are vital for the development of the nervous system. Dev Biol. 2010;339(2):451–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. 63.↵
    Yukiura H, Hama K, Nakanaga K, Tanaka M, Asaoka Y, Okudaira S, et al. Autotaxin regulates vascular development via multiple lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptors in zebrafish. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(51):43972–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    Gralinski LE, Menachery VD, Morgan AP, Totura AL, Beall A, Kocher J, et al. Allelic Variation in the Toll-Like Receptor Adaptor Protein Ticam2 Contributes to SARS-Coronavirus Pathogenesis in Mice. G3 (Bethesda). 2017;7(6):1653–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    Gralinski LE, Ferris MT, Aylor DL, Whitmore AC, Green R, Frieman MB, et al. Genome Wide Identification of SARS-CoV Susceptibility Loci Using the Collaborative Cross. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(10):e1005504.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    Kanda H, Newton R, Klein R, Morita Y, Gunn MD, Rosen SD. Autotaxin, an ectoenzyme that produces lysophosphatidic acid, promotes the entry of lymphocytes into secondary lymphoid organs. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(4):415–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. 67.↵
    Takeda Y, Matoba K, Kawanami D, Nagai Y, Akamine T, Ishizawa S, et al. ROCK2 Regulates Monocyte Migration and Cell to Cell Adhesion in Vascular Endothelial Cells. International journal of molecular sciences. 2019;20(6):1331.
    OpenUrl
  68. 68.
    Rizza C, Leitinger N, Yue J, Fischer DJ, Wang DA, Shih PT, et al. Lysophosphatidic acid as a regulator of endothelial/leukocyte interaction. Lab Invest. 1999;79(10):1227–35.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  69. 69.↵
    Shlyonsky V, Naeije R, Mies F. Possible role of lysophosphatidic acid in rat model of hypoxic pulmonary vascular remodeling. Pulm Circ. 2014;4(3):471–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. 70.↵
    Ray R, Rai V. Lysophosphatidic acid converts monocytes into macrophages in both mice and humans. Blood. 2017.
  71. 71.
    Ninou I, Sevastou I, Magkrioti C, Kaffe E, Stamatakis G, Thivaios S, et al. Genetic deletion of Autotaxin from CD11b+ cells decreases the severity of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0226050.
    OpenUrl
  72. 72.↵
    Santos-Nogueira E, Lopez-Serrano C, Hernandez J, Lago N, Astudillo AM, Balsinde J, et al. Activation of Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor Type 1 Contributes to Pathophysiology of Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurosci. 2015;35(28):10224–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. 73.↵
    Martino A, Volpe E, Baldini PM. The influence of lysophosphatidic acid on the immunophenotypic differentiation of human monocytes into dendritic cells. Haematologica. 2006;91(9):1273–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. 74.↵
    Chen R, Roman J, Guo J, West E, McDyer J, Williams MA, et al. Lysophosphatidic acid modulates the activation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2006;15(6):797–804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    Siegal FP, Kadowaki N, Shodell M, Fitzgerald-Bocarsly PA, Shah K, Ho S, et al. The nature of the principal type 1 interferon-producing cells in human blood. Science. 1999;284(5421):1835–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. 76.↵
    Saichi M, Ladjemi MZ, Korniotis S, Rousseau C, Ait Hamou Z, Massenet-Regad L, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of blood antigen-presenting cells in severe COVID-19 reveals multi-process defects in antiviral immunity. Nature Cell Biology. 2021;23(5):538–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. 77.↵
    Zhou R, To KK, Wong YC, Liu L, Zhou B, Li X, et al. Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection Impairs Dendritic Cell and T Cell Responses. Immunity. 2020;53(4):864-77.e5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    Sánchez-Cerrillo I, Landete P, Aldave B, Sánchez-Alonso S, Sánchez-Azofra A, Marcos-Jiménez A, et al. COVID-19 severity associates with pulmonary redistribution of CD1c+ DCs and inflammatory transitional and nonclassical monocytes. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(12):6290–300.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.↵
    Hadjadj J, Yatim N, Barnabei L, Corneau A, Boussier J, Smith N, et al. Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients. Science. 2020;369(6504):718–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. 80.↵
    Cisse B, Caton ML, Lehner M, Maeda T, Scheu S, Locksley R, et al. Transcription factor E2-2 is an essential and specific regulator of plasmacytoid dendritic cell development. Cell. 2008;135(1):37–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  81. 81.↵
    Guo L, He P, No YR, Yun CC. Krüppel-like factor 5 incorporates into the β-catenin/TCF complex in response to LPA in colon cancer cells. Cellular signalling. 2015;27(5):961–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.↵
    Tazi A, Bouchonnet F, Grandsaigne M, Boumsell L, Hance AJ, Soler P. Evidence that granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor regulates the distribution and differentiated state of dendritic cells/Langerhans cells in human lung and lung cancers. J Clin Invest. 1993;91(2):566–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  83. 83.
    Zeng Z, Castaño AR, Segelke BW, Stura EA, Peterson PA, Wilson IA. Crystal structure of mouse CD1: An MHC-like fold with a large hydrophobic binding groove. Science. 1997;277(5324):339–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. 84.↵
    Bourgeois EA, Subramaniam S, Cheng TY, De Jong A, Layre E, Ly D, et al. Bee venom processes human skin lipids for presentation by CD1a. J Exp Med. 2015;212(2):149–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. 85.↵
    Condamine T, Le Texier L, Howie D, Lavault A, Hill M, Halary F, et al. Tmem176B and Tmem176A are associated with the immature state of dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88(3):507–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  86. 86.↵
    Picotto G, Morse LR, Nguyen N, Saltzman J, Battaglino R. TMEM176A and TMEM176B Are Candidate Regulators of Inhibition of Dendritic Cell Maturation and Function after Chronic Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37(3):528–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  87. 87.↵
    Spagnolo P, Balestro E, Aliberti S, Cocconcelli E, Biondini D, Casa GD, et al. Pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19: a call to arms? Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(8):750–2.
    OpenUrl
  88. 88.
    George PM, Wells AU, Jenkins RG. Pulmonary fibrosis and COVID-19: the potential role for antifibrotic therapy. Lancet Respir Med. 2020.
  89. 89.↵
    Vasarmidi E, Tsitoura E, Spandidos DA, Tzanakis N, Antoniou KM. Pulmonary fibrosis in the aftermath of the COVID-19 era (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2020;20(3):2557–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  90. 90.↵
    Maher TM, Kreuter M, Lederer DJ, Brown KK, Wuyts W, Verbruggen N, et al. Rationale, design and objectives of two phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled studies of GLPG1690, a novel autotaxin inhibitor, in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (ISABELA 1 and 2). BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019;6(1):e000422.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Posted July 31, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Increased Autotaxin levels in severe COVID-19, correlating with IL-6 levels, endothelial dysfunction biomarkers, and impaired functions of dendritic cells
Ioanna Nikitopoulou, Dionysios Fanidis, Konstantinos Ntatsoulis, Panagiotis Moulos, George Mpekoulis, Maria Evangelidou, Alice G. Vassiliou, Vasiliki Dimakopoulou, Edison Jahaj, Stamatios Tsipilis, Stylianos E. Orfanos, Ioanna Dimopoulou, Emmanouil Angelakis, Karolina Akinosoglou, Niki Vassilaki, Argyris Tzouvelekis, Anastasia Kotanidou, Vassilis Aidinis
medRxiv 2021.07.30.21261361; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.30.21261361
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area