ABSTRACT
Lyme disease, the most common tick-borne illness in the United States, is most frequently caused by infection with Borrelia burgdorferi. Although early antibiotic treatment can prevent development of severe illness and late manifestations, diagnosis is challenging in patients who do not present with a typical erythema migrans rash. To support a diagnosis of Lyme disease in such cases, guidelines recommend 2-tiered serologic testing. However, 2-tiered testing has numerous limitations, including ambiguity in interpretation and lower sensitivity in early disease. We developed a diagnostic approach for Lyme disease based on the T-cell response to B. burgdorferi infection by immunosequencing T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoires in blood samples from 3 independent cohorts of patients with laboratory-confirmed or clinically diagnosed early Lyme disease, as well as endemic and non-endemic controls. We identified 251 public, Lyme-associated TCRs that were used to train a classifier for detection of early Lyme disease with 99% specificity. In a validation cohort of individuals with early Lyme disease, TCR testing demonstrated a 1.9-fold increase in sensitivity compared to standard 2-tiered testing (STTT; 56% versus 30%), with a 3.1-fold increase ≤4 days from the onset of symptoms (44% versus 14%). TCR positivity predicted subsequent seroconversion in 37% of initially STTT-negative patients, suggesting that the T-cell response is detectable before the humoral response. While positivity for both tests declined after treatment, greater declines in posttreatment sensitivity were observed for STTT compared to TCR testing. Higher TCR scores were associated with clinical measures of disease severity, including abnormal liver function test results, disseminated rash, and number of symptoms. A subset of Lyme-associated TCRs mapped to B. burgdorferi antigens, demonstrating high specificity of a TCR immunosequencing approach. These results support the clinical utility of T-cell‒based testing as a sensitive and specific diagnostic for early Lyme disease, particularly in the initial days of illness.
Competing Interest Statement
M.P., J.N.D., R.M.G., T.M.S., and I.M.K. declare employment and equity ownership in Adaptive Biotechnologies. S.C.D. declares employment with Adaptive Biotechnologies and Stanford University School of Medicine, and equity ownership in Adaptive Biotechnologies. A.W.R. declares institutional support from the Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation, and Global Lyme Alliance. M.J.S. declares institutional support from the Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation, and NIH grant P30 AR070254. E.J.H. declares compensation from the Lyme Disease Biobank and institutional support from Bay Area Lyme Foundation, the Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation, and Adaptive Biotechnologies. R.O.E. and T.M. declare employment with Adaptive Biotechnologies during the time of this research. L.B. and H.S.R. declare employment, equity ownership and leadership with Adaptive Biotechnologies. J.N.A. declares consulting with Tarsus Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer; participation in an advisory board with Adaptive Biotechnologies; expert testimony; membership on the Bay Area Lyme Foundation Scientific Advisory Board; Past Chair, 2018, HHS Tick-borne Disease Working Group, Office of HIV/AIDS and Infectious Disease Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health, Department of Health and Human Services; and institutional support from the Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation and Global Lyme Alliance.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Adaptive Biotechnologies, who also funded medical writing and editorial support provided by Melanie Styers of BluPrint Oncology Concepts and Kristin MacIntosh of Adaptive Biotechnologies.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All procedures involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For the Lyme Disease Biobank (LDB) cohort, Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained for each site through the LDB sponsor protocol (Advarra IRB) or institution-specific IRB. For the Boca Biolistics cohort, IRB approval was obtained through Advarra IRB. Human subjects protocols for the JHU cohort were approved by the IRBs of Johns Hopkins University and Stanford University. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data requests may be submitted for consideration to Adaptive Biotechnologies Medical Information (https://www.adaptivebiotech.com/medical-information-request/).
