Structured Abstract
Background Impaired eyeblink conditioning is often cited as evidence for cerebellar dysfunction in isolated dystonia yet the results from individual studies are conflicting and underpowered.
Objective To systematically examine the influence of dystonia, dystonia subtype and clinical features over eyeblink conditioning within a statistical model which controlled for the covariates age and sex.
Methods Original neurophysiological data from all published studies were shared to an age and sex matched control group. Two raters blinded to participant identity scored all recordings (6732 trials). After higher inter-rater agreement was confirmed, mean conditioning per block was entered into a mixed repetitive measures model.
Results Much variability of eyeblink conditioning was seen in both groups. All dystonia versus controls showed no difference in conditioning (p=0.517). Analysis of dystonia subgroup, with age and sex as covariates did not reveal evidence that eyeblink conditioning is impaired in specific subtypes (cervical dystonia, DYT-TOR1A, DYT-THAP1 or focal hand dystonia). The presence of tremor did not significantly influence levels of eyeblink conditioning.
Conclusions Collaborative efforts such as this article allow larger number of patients to be evaluated and provide more balanced estimates of disease effects over experimental outcomes. Intact eyeblink conditioning is against a global cerebellar learning deficit in isolated dystonia. Precise mechanisms for how the cerebellum interplays mechanistically with other key neuroanatomical nodes within the dystonic network remains an open research question.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
NA
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study had been approved by the local ethics committee (South Central - Oxford B Research Ethics Committee reference: 18/SC/0159) and written informed consent was obtained. Health Research Authority and Care Research Wales Approval was also given for the study to be conducted within participating National Health Service sites.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Financial Disclosure/Conflict of Interest There are no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest related to this research to declare.
Funding sources for study AS is supported by a Chadburn Clinical Lectureship in Medicine and a project grant from the Royal Society.
Data Availability
NA
