Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Online user comments responding to deemed consent organ donor legislation in Nova Scotia: a divided public or a few loud voices?

Alessandro R. Marcon, Darren N. Wagner, Christen Rachul, Matthew J. Weiss
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.24.21260542
Alessandro R. Marcon
1Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: marcon@ualberta.ca
Darren N. Wagner
1Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christen Rachul
2Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew J. Weiss
3Transplant Québec (Montréal, QC); CHU de Québec, Université Laval Research Centre, Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval (Québec, QC); Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (Edmonton, AB)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The Canadian province of Nova Scotia recently became the first jurisdiction in North America to pass deemed consent organ donation legislation. This change in legislation generated substantial online discussion, which we analyzed to provide insights on public perception.

Methods We performed directed content analysis on 2663 user-generated comments appearing on two widely-shared Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC) articles published online in April 2019. We determined levels of support and opposition in comments and described the specific rhetoric used for doing so. We also performed one-way ANOVA and Pearson chi-square tests to determine how the comments were being received and engaged by other users.

Results A range of commentary was present in both support and opposition to the changes in legislation. There were more negative than positive comments, and negative commentary generated more replies. Positive comments were received more positively by other users, while negative comments were received more negatively. The total sum of negative comments was greatly influenced by a small number of very active participants. Negative commentary focused more on broad concepts and principles related to government, power, and individual rights rather than specific issues in the Nova Scotian context. Substantial issues of trust in the government and healthcare system were evident.

Conclusions There were strong positive and negative sentiments expressed in the comments, but the total sum of negativity in the comments was significantly influenced by a small number of commentators. Analysis on the presumed consent concerns can be helpful to inform public outreach efforts.

Implication Statement This research is the first to examine the robust online commentary regarding reactions to Nova Scotia’s recently-passed deemed consent organ donation law. Our analysis provides extensive detail on the commentary in favour and in opposition to the new law, which has relevance for understanding public perception and designing public outreach.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors thank and acknowledge Health Canada, Genome Canada, Genome Alberta, and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research for their generous support of Legislative Strategies to Improve Deceased Organ Donation in Canada: A Special Focus on Evaluating the Impact of Opt-Out Legislation in Canada LEADDeR and Precision Medicine CanPREVENT AMR: Applying Precision Medicine Technologies in Canada to Prevent Antibody Mediated Rejection and Premature Kidney Transplant Loss.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The user comments analyzed here consist of publicly shared media content, and ethics approval was therefore not required. Nonetheless, no usernames appear in this report to help protect privacy.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Funding: The authors thank and acknowledge Health Canada, Genome Canada, Genome Alberta, and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research for their generous support of Legislative Strategies to Improve Deceased Organ Donation in Canada: A Special Focus on Evaluating the Impact of Opt-Out Legislation in Canada LEADDeR and Precision Medicine CanPREVENT AMR: Applying Precision Medicine Technologies in Canada to Prevent Antibody Mediated Rejection and Premature Kidney Transplant Loss.

Data Availability

All data relied upon in the article is appended within the submission. Any request for raw data can be addressed to the corresponding author.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 26, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Online user comments responding to deemed consent organ donor legislation in Nova Scotia: a divided public or a few loud voices?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Online user comments responding to deemed consent organ donor legislation in Nova Scotia: a divided public or a few loud voices?
Alessandro R. Marcon, Darren N. Wagner, Christen Rachul, Matthew J. Weiss
medRxiv 2021.07.24.21260542; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.24.21260542
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Online user comments responding to deemed consent organ donor legislation in Nova Scotia: a divided public or a few loud voices?
Alessandro R. Marcon, Darren N. Wagner, Christen Rachul, Matthew J. Weiss
medRxiv 2021.07.24.21260542; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.24.21260542

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Transplantation
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (227)
  • Allergy and Immunology (501)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1233)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (529)
  • Epidemiology (10012)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (498)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2448)
  • Geriatric Medicine (236)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1636)
  • Health Policy (751)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (635)
  • Hematology (248)
  • HIV/AIDS (532)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11860)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (625)
  • Medical Education (252)
  • Medical Ethics (74)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2277)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (350)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (452)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (534)
  • Oncology (1245)
  • Ophthalmology (375)
  • Orthopedics (133)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (155)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (729)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (311)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2280)
  • Public and Global Health (4828)
  • Radiology and Imaging (834)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (490)
  • Respiratory Medicine (650)
  • Rheumatology (283)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (237)
  • Sports Medicine (226)
  • Surgery (266)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)