Abstract
Background and objectives Low socioeconomic status (SES) is consistently associated with chronic stress, poor health, and premature death in high income countries (HICs). However, the degree to which SES gradients in health are universal—or even steeper under contemporary, post-industrial conditions—remains poorly understood.
Methodology We quantified material wealth and several health outcomes among a population of traditional pastoralists, the Turkana of northwest Kenya, who are currently transitioning toward a more urban, market-integrated lifestyle. We assessed whether SES associations with health differed in subsistence-level versus urban contexts. We also explored the causes and consequences of SES-health associations by measuring serum cortisol, potential sociobehavioral mediators in early life and adulthood, and adult reproductive success (number of surviving offspring).
Results High SES predicts better self-reported health and more offspring in traditional pastoralist Turkana, but worse cardiometabolic health and fewer offspring in urban Turkana. We do not find robust evidence for either direct biological mediators (i.e., cortisol) or indirect sociobehavioral mediators (e.g., adult diet or health behaviors, early life experiences) of SES-health relationships in either context.
Conclusions and implications While social gradients in health are common in non-human primates, small-scale human societies, and HICs, we find that relationships between wealth and health can vary dramatically within a single population. Our findings emphasize that under different economic and societal circumstances, social status effects on health may manifest in very different ways.
Lay summary High socioeconomic status predicts better health and more offspring in traditional Turkana pastoralists, but worse health and fewer offspring in individuals of the same group living in urban centers. Together, our work shows that under different economic and societal circumstances, wealth effects on health may manifest in very different ways.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by awards to J.F.A. through Princeton University's Dean for Research Innovations Funds as well as the Chan Zuckerburg Initiative. A.J.L. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Helen Hay Whitney Foundation. We declare no conflicts of interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by Princeton University's Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research (IRB# 10237), and Maseno University's Ethics Review Committee (MSU/DRPI/MUERC/00519/18). We also received county-level approval for research activities, and research permits from Kenya's National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI/P/18/46195/24671). Written, informed consent was obtained from all participants after the study goals, sampling procedures, and potential risks were discussed with community elders and explained to participants in their preferred language (by both a local official, usually the village chief, and by researchers or field assistants).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
anonymized data underlying the main results will be publicly available on Dryad following publication.
