Abstract
There is a limited understanding of IT’s role as a crucial enabler of patient agility and the department’s ability to respond to patient’s needs and wishes adequately. This study’s objective is to contribute to the insights of the validity of the hypothesized relationship between IT resources, practices and capabilities, and hospital departments’ knowledge processes and the department’s ability to adequately sense and respond to patient needs and wishes, i.e., patient agility. This study conveniently sampled data from 107 clinical hospital departments in the Netherlands and uses structural equation modeling for model assessment. IT ambidexterity positively enhances the development of a digital dynamic capability. Likewise, IT ambidexterity also positively impacts the hospital department’s knowledge processes. Both digital dynamic capability and knowledge processes positively influence patient agility. IT ambidexterity promotes taking advantage of IT resources and experiments to reshape patient services and enhance patient agility.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was obtained.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Open University has a Research Ethics Committee (cETO) that assesses ethical aspects of studies. The Faculty of Science (of which I am part) does not have such an obligation to run studies through cETO. Notwithstanding, I contacted cETO and they advised me to gain approval from our Dean. The following message is from our Dean: His work with the title 'The role of IT ambidexterity, digital dynamic capability and knowledge processes as enablers of patient agility: an empirical study' is about a hypothesized relationship between IT resources, practices, capabilities, hospital departments' knowledge processes, and the department's ability to sense and respond to patient needs and wishes adequately, i.e., patient agility. Data were systematically collected as part of five Master student's thesis projects. These students conveniently sampled data from 107 clinical hospital departments in the Netherlands. The survey is based on previously validated measures, and data were collected with informed consent and in line with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) principles. Data were treated anonymously and analyzed only on an aggregate level for model assessment purposes using appropriate methods. Also, patients did not participate in this work. In conclusion, this work applied our Faculty's research principles, and for this type of work, there is no need to go through our Research Ethics Committee (cETO) further, our university-wide advisory committee that operates under the deans of the faculties. Prof.dr. Marko van Eekelen Dean Faculty of Science Open University of the Netherlands Valkenburgerweg 177 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available upon request.
