Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

IT ambidexterity driven patient agility and hospital patient service performance: a variance approach

View ORCID ProfileRogier van de Wetering
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.20.21258538
Rogier van de Wetering
1Department of Information Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rogier van de Wetering
  • For correspondence: rogier.vandewetering{at}ou.nl
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Hospitals are currently exploring digital options to transform their clinical procedures and their overall engagement with patients. This paper investigates how hospital departments can leverage the ability of firms to simultaneously explore new IT resources and practices (IT exploration) as well as exploit their current IT resources and practices (IT exploitation), i.e., IT ambidexterity, to adequately sense and respond to patients’ needs and demands, i.e., patient agility. This study embraces the dynamic capability view and develops a research model, and tests it accordingly using cross-sectional data from 90 clinical hospital departments from the Netherlands through an online survey. The model’s hypothesized relationships are tested using Partial Least Squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM). The outcomes demonstrate the significance of IT ambidexterity in developing patient agility, positively influencing patient service performance. The study outcomes support the theorized model can the outcomes shed light on how to transform clinical practice and drive patient agility.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Open University has a Research Ethics Committee (cETO) that assesses ethical aspects of studies. The Faculty of Science (of which I am part) does not have such an obligation to run studies through cETO. Notwithstanding, I contacted cETO and they advised me to gain approval from our Dean. The following message is from our Dean: His work with the title 'The role of IT ambidexterity, digital dynamic capability and knowledge processes as enablers of patient agility: an empirical study' is about a hypothesized relationship between IT resources, practices, capabilities, hospital departments' knowledge processes, and the department's ability to sense and respond to patient needs and wishes adequately, i.e., patient agility. Data were systematically collected as part of five Master student's thesis projects. These students conveniently sampled data from 107 clinical hospital departments in the Netherlands. The survey is based on previously validated measures, and data were collected with informed consent and in line with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) principles. Data were treated anonymously and analyzed only on an aggregate level for model assessment purposes using appropriate methods. Also, patients did not participate in this work. In conclusion, this work applied our Faculty's research principles, and for this type of work, there is no need to go through our Research Ethics Committee (cETO) further, our university-wide advisory committee that operates under the deans of the faculties. Prof.dr. Marko van Eekelen Dean Faculty of Science Open University of the Netherlands Valkenburgerweg 177 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (dr. Van de Wetering). The data are not publicly available due to restrictions.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 22, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
IT ambidexterity driven patient agility and hospital patient service performance: a variance approach
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
IT ambidexterity driven patient agility and hospital patient service performance: a variance approach
Rogier van de Wetering
medRxiv 2021.07.20.21258538; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.20.21258538
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
IT ambidexterity driven patient agility and hospital patient service performance: a variance approach
Rogier van de Wetering
medRxiv 2021.07.20.21258538; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.20.21258538

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3294)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (279)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13375)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5153)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3268)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
  • Hematology (431)
  • HIV/AIDS (1017)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14627)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (523)
  • Neurology (4925)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (724)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4212)
  • Public and Global Health (7504)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1705)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1013)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)