Abstract
The preference for a COVID-19 vaccine, among many available, may be difficult for common people and normally relies on efficacy values reported from clinical trials. Vaccine efficacy depends on statistical data from primary and secondary endpoints of a trial. This study provides a time-varying mathematical framework that compares two vaccines of contrasting efficacy (Pfizer-BioNTech and AstraZeneca-Oxford) using hypothetical trials with real-world data. Modeling shows that efficacies can fluctuate depending on the prevailing infection rate and demographics. The efficacy of AstraZeneca-Oxford can become comparable and even better than Pfizer-BioNTech, depending on the region and time of the clinical trials. We also introduce an idea of composite efficacy considering multi-variants and show that the efficacy of various vaccines shows differential sensitivity to the delta variant rampant in India.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.overleaf.com/project/60f3f4972d7eee548b39b610
Funding Statement
NA
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
NA
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Title is revised
Data Availability
Data available within the manuscript