Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid development of multiple vaccines, vaccines that were tested in clinical trials located in several countries around the world. Because prior research has shown that pharmaceuticals do not receive consistent and timely authorization for use in lower-income countries where they are tested, we conducted a cross-sectional study examining the authorization or approval and delivery for COVID-19 vaccines recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the countries where they were tested. While countries of varying incomes have largely authorized the COVID-19 vaccines tested within their populations for use, high-income countries have received proportionately more doses, enabling them to more fully vaccinate their populations. As many lower-income countries continue to experience inequitable shortfalls in COVID-19 vaccine supply amid the ongoing pandemic, efforts must be undertaken to ensure timely access in countries across all income groups, including those hosting clinical trials.
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid development of multiple vaccines, vaccines that were tested in clinical trials located in several countries around the world.1 However, low- and middle-income countries have experienced significant delays in vaccine access despite mechanisms meant to ensure fair distribution, such as COVAX.2 Because prior research has shown that pharmaceuticals do not receive consistent and timely authorization for use in lower income countries where they are tested,3 we examined the authorization or approval and delivery for COVID-19 vaccines recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the countries where they were tested.
Methods
For this cross-sectional study, we identified COVID-19 vaccines listed by the WHO for emergency use as of June 8, 2021. We then identified all completed clinical trials for these vaccines using the WHO COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker and Landscape and the McGill University COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker. We then extracted trial primary completion dates, phase, and country locations from ClinicalTrials.gov. Each country was classified by national income group using the World Bank historical classifications for this year (2021).4
Through regional and national regulatory agency websites, we determined whether these countries hosting vaccine clinical trials also authorized or approved its use (hereafter, authorized). Additionally, for each country, we extracted data on doses procured and delivered from the UNICEF COVID-19 Vaccine Market Dashboard and the Airfinity COVID-19 platform. We calculated the proportion of countries hosting clinical trials authorizing any vaccine, and the vaccine tested in their population, and their delivery, overall and for individual manufacturers. Lastly, we determined the median proportion of people aged 15 years and older in each country able to receive a full vaccination series using population data from the United Nation’s World Population Dashboard. We conducted descriptive statistical analyses, estimating medians and proportions, using Excel spreadsheet software version 16.0 (Microsoft).
Results
The six unique COVID-19 vaccines, listed for emergency use by the WHO as of June 8, 2021, were tested in 21 countries (Table 1). Among 10 high-income countries hosting completed clinical trials, 9 (90.0%) authorized the tested vaccine and received enough doses to vaccinate a median 12.4% (IQR,1.6-24.4) of these countries’ populations aged 15 years and older. Among the 10 upper-middle income countries, rates were 90.0% and 3.4% (IQR,0.8-19.6), respectively. Examining ongoing and completed trials, corresponding rates were higher for high-income countries, but lower for upper middle-income countries (Table 1).
Access to any COVID-19 vaccine in countries with completed clinical trials categorized by national income group (as of June 8, 2021)
While Moderna completed all clinical trials in one country, AstraZeneca and Janssen completed trials in 10 and 12 countries, respectively (Table 2), receiving authorization for their vaccines in 60.0% and 75.0% of these countries, respectively. Across manufacturers, high-income countries received more doses to vaccinate larger median proportions of countries’ populations aged 15 years and older. Delivery of doses procured by COVAX ranged between 0% and 9.8% with no doses delivered of Moderna or Janssen vaccines as of June 8, 2021.
Access to COVID-19 vaccines in countries hosting completed clinical trials categorized by manufacturer (as of June 8, 2021)
Discussion
While countries of varying incomes have largely authorized the COVID-19 vaccines tested within their populations for use, high-income countries have received proportionately more doses, enabling them to more fully vaccinate their populations. These findings parallel ongoing access disparities, as high-income countries have successfully procured5 and administered6 doses ahead of low- and middle-income countries.
Study limitations include inability to account for the number of participants enrolled in vaccine trials per country, which was not systematically reported for all trials, and inability to account for the impact of manufacturing errors and safety concerns on dosage delivery, which particularly affected AstraZeneca and Janssen.
As many lower-income countries continue to experience inequitable shortfalls in COVID-19 vaccine supply amid the ongoing pandemic, efforts must be undertaken to ensure timely access in countries across all income groups, including those hosting clinical trials.
Data Availability
Dr. Ramachandran had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Requests for the dataset can be made to the corresponding author at reshma.ramachandran{at}yale.edu.
Data access and responsibility
Dr. Ramachandran had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Author contributions
RR, JSR, and JEM contributed to study concept and design; RR abstracted the data; all authors contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data; RR drafted the manuscript; all authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript; and JEM provided study supervision.
Funding/support and role of the sponsor
This project was not supported by any external grants or funds.
Potential competing interests
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: Dr. Ramachandran is a board member for Universities Allied for Essential Medicines North America, which is a member organization in The People’s Vaccine coalition and also co-hosts the Free the Vaccine campaign. While Dr. Ramachandran is an employee of the Veterans Health Administration, the views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs or the U.S. government. In the past 36 months, Dr. Ross formerly received research support through Yale University from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation for the Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT) at Yale; Dr. Ross currently receives support from the Food and Drug Administration for the Yale-Mayo Clinic Center for Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI) program (U01FD005938); Dr. Ross received research support through Yale University from Medtronic, Inc. and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to develop methods for postmarket surveillance of medical devices (U01FD004585) and from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to develop and maintain performance measures that are used for public reporting (HHSM-500-2013-13018I); Dr. Ross currently receives research support through Yale University from Johnson and Johnson to develop methods of clinical trial data sharing, from the Medical Device Innovation Consortium as part of the National Evaluation System for Health Technology (NEST), from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS022882), from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01HS025164, R01HL144644), and from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation to establish the Good Pharma Scorecard at Bioethics International. Dr. Miller reports receiving grants from Arnold Ventures, Susan G. Komen Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health (NOT-OD-20-121) during the conduct of this study as well as serving on advisory committees for Alexion and Cambia Health and the board of directors for Bioethics International.
Acknowledgements
