Abstract
Context During COVID-19 care-homes had to implement strict Infection Control Measures (ICMs), impacting on care and staff morale.
Objectives To explore the lived experiences of care-home staff in implementing ICMs.
Methods Mixed-methods study comprising 238 online survey responses and 15 in-depth interviews with care-home staff, November 2020-January 2021 in England.
Results Three themes were identified: ‘Integrating COVID-19 ICMs with caring’, ‘Conveying knowledge and information’, ‘Professional and personal impacts of care-work during the pandemic’. Reported adherence to ICMs was high but fatalistic attitudes towards COVID-19 infection were present. Challenges of providing care using personal protective equipment (PPE), especially for residents with dementia, were highlighted. Interviewees reported dilemmas between strictly implementing ICMs and conflicts with providing best care to residents and preserving personal space. Nine months into COVID-19, official guidance was reported as confusing, constantly changing and poorly suited to care-homes. Care-home staff appreciated opportunities to work with other care-homes and experts to interpret and implement guidance. ICM training was undertaken using multiple techniques but with little evaluation of these or how to sustain behaviour change.
Limitations Results may not be generalizable to other countries.
Implications COVID-19 has had a profound effect on well-being of care-home staff. Despite challenges, participants reported broadly good morale, potentially a consequence of supportive colleagues and management. Nevertheless, clear, concise and care-home focussed ICM guidance is still needed. This should include evidence-based assessments on implementing and sustaining adherence. Groups of care-home staff and ICM experts working together to co-create, interpret and implement guidance were viewed positively.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Professor Lake and Dr Brainard were funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at Kings College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) and collaboration with the University of East Anglia. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, UEA, the Department of Health or PHE.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee (reference: 2020/21-038)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest:
Diane: None
Julii: None
Kathleen: None
Charlotte: None
Iain: None
Diane Bunn: Concept, design, recruitment, qualitative data analysis, interpretation of survey & interview data, writing 1st draft of paper, ongoing revisions, approving final version
I agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Julii Brainard: Concept, survey design, recruitment, quantitative data analysis, interpretation, thematic coding of interview data, ongoing revisions, approving final version
I agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Kathleen Lane: Design, recruitment, interviewing, qualitative data analysis, contribution to interpretation and integration of survey and interview data, contribution to draft and ongoing revisions of paper.
I agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Charlotte Salter: Interviewing, qualitative data analysis, contribution to interpretation and integration of interview data, contribution to draft and ongoing revisions of paper.
I agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Iain Lake: Funding, design, thematic coding of interview data, contribution to interpretation and integration of survey and interview data, contribution to draft and ongoing revisions of paper.
I agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Data Availability
Subject to not yet obtained approval by our IRB, the survey data and thematically coded data may be available from authors.
