Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses

TARG Meta-Research Group & Collaborators, View ORCID ProfileRobert T Thibault, Robbie Clark, Hugo Pedder, Olmo van den Akker, View ORCID ProfileSamuel Westwood, Jacqueline Thompson, View ORCID ProfileMarcus Munafo
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.07.21259868
1University of Bristol
Robert T Thibault
1University of Bristol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Robert T Thibault
  • For correspondence: robert.thibault@bristol.ac.uk
Robbie Clark
1University of Bristol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hugo Pedder
1University of Bristol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olmo van den Akker
2Tilburg University;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel Westwood
3King’s College London; University of Wolverhampton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Samuel Westwood
Jacqueline Thompson
1University of Bristol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcus Munafo
1University of Bristol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marcus Munafo
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Prospectively registering study plans in a permanent time-stamped and publicly accessible document is becoming more common across disciplines and aims to improve the trustworthiness of research findings. Selective reporting persists, however, when researchers deviate from their registered plans without disclosure. This systematic review aims to estimate the prevalence of undisclosed discrepancies between prospectively registered study plans and their associated publication. We further aim to identify the research disciplines where these discrepancies have been observed, whether interventions to reduce discrepancies have been conducted, and gaps in the literature.

Methods On 15 December 2019, we searched Scopus and Web of Knowledge for articles that included quantitative data about discrepancies between registrations or study protocols and their associated publications. We used random-effects meta-analyses to synthesize the results.

Results We reviewed k = 89 articles, including k = 70 that report on primary outcome discrepancies from n = 6314 studies and, k = 22 that report on secondary outcome discrepancies from n = 1436 studies. Meta-analyses indicate that between 10% to 68% (95% prediction interval) of studies contain at least one primary outcome discrepancy and between 13% to 95% (95% prediction interval) contain at least one secondary outcome discrepancy. Almost all articles assessed clinical literature, and there was considerable heterogeneity, resulting in wide prediction intervals. We identified only one article that attempted to correct discrepancies.

Discussion Many articles did not include information on whether discrepancies were disclosed, which version of a registration they compared publications to, and whether the registration was prospective. Thus, our estimates represent discrepancies broadly, rather than our target of undisclosed discrepancies between prospectively registered study plans and their associated publications. Discrepancies are common and reduce the trustworthiness of medical research. Interventions to reduce discrepancies could prove valuable.

Registration osf.io/ktmdg. Protocol amendments are listed in Supplementary Material A.

Competing Interest Statement

All authors have a current interest in improving research practice and quality. Our prior belief that discrepancies between registrations and publications are common, and that they reduce the trustworthiness of research, motivated the conception of this review.

Clinical Trial

osf.io/ktmdg

Clinical Protocols

https://osf.io/ktmdg

Funding Statement

Robert Thibault is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec. Hugo Pedder was funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Marcus Munafo, Robert Thibault, Jacqueline Thompson, and Robbie Clark are part of the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (MC_UU_00011/7). Robbie Clark is supported by a SWDTP ESRC +3 PhD studentship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

NA. This is a systematic review.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • (a contributorship statement is included before the references)

  • There was an error in the authorship list, which is now corrected. No other changes have been made to the manuscript since the first version uploaded to medRxiv.

Data Availability

All data and analysis code will be openly shared on the University of Bristol Data Repository upon acceptance for publication. Before acceptance, these documents will be available at https://osf.io/5gfty/

https://osf.io/5gfty/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 09, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses
TARG Meta-Research Group & Collaborators, Robert T Thibault, Robbie Clark, Hugo Pedder, Olmo van den Akker, Samuel Westwood, Jacqueline Thompson, Marcus Munafo
medRxiv 2021.07.07.21259868; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.07.21259868
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses
TARG Meta-Research Group & Collaborators, Robert T Thibault, Robbie Clark, Hugo Pedder, Olmo van den Akker, Samuel Westwood, Jacqueline Thompson, Marcus Munafo
medRxiv 2021.07.07.21259868; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.07.21259868

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (215)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1094)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (195)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (500)
  • Epidemiology (9760)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (480)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2304)
  • Geriatric Medicine (222)
  • Health Economics (462)
  • Health Informatics (1554)
  • Health Policy (734)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (603)
  • Hematology (236)
  • HIV/AIDS (502)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11637)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (616)
  • Medical Education (236)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (257)
  • Neurology (2140)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (336)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (426)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (517)
  • Oncology (1173)
  • Ophthalmology (363)
  • Orthopedics (128)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (145)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (309)
  • Pediatrics (694)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (298)
  • Primary Care Research (266)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2176)
  • Public and Global Health (4649)
  • Radiology and Imaging (775)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (456)
  • Respiratory Medicine (623)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (225)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (250)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)