ABSTRACT
Background Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe mental disorder, characterized by prominent mood swings and emotion regulation (ER) deficits. The uncinate fasciculus (UF), a white matter tract connecting the amygdala and the ventral prefrontal cortex, has been implicated in ER. Aberrancies in UF microstructure may be an endophenotype associated with increased risk for BD. However, findings in individuals with BD and at familial risk for BD (AR) have yielded inconsistent findings. This meta-analysis takes a region-of-interest approach to consolidate the available evidence and elucidate the role of the UF in the risk-architecture of BD.
Methods Using web-based search engines, we identified diffusion tensor imaging studies focusing on the left and right UF and conducted meta-analyses comparing fractional anisotropy (FA) and radial diffusivity (RD) between BD or AR to healthy volunteers (HV).
Results We included 32 studies (nBD=1186, nHV=2001; nAR=289, nHV=314). Compared to HV, individuals with BD showed lower FA in the right (p<.0001) and left UF (p=.010), and higher RD in the right UF (p=.009). We found no significant differences between AR and HV. In the right but not the left UF, AR individuals showed higher FA than BD (p=.043).
Conclusion Comparable UF microstructure between AR and HV and higher FA in the right UF in AR compared to BD suggest that aberrancies in UF microstructure is not an endophenotype for BD. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine when UF abnormalities emerge in the context of BD.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIMH (ZIA: MH002778-18).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Mental Health has deemed meta-analyses to be exempt from a specific approval process.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All meta-data and R-code can be accessed via the Open Science Forum (OSF).
