Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19

View ORCID ProfileEzra Aydin, View ORCID ProfileKevin A. Glasgow, View ORCID ProfileStaci M. Weiss, Zahra Khan, View ORCID ProfileTopun Austin, View ORCID ProfileMark H. Johnson, View ORCID ProfileJane Barlow, View ORCID ProfileSarah Lloyd-Fox
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.05.21260022
Ezra Aydin
1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ezra Aydin
  • For correspondence: ea420{at}cam.ac.uk
Kevin A. Glasgow
2Department of Education, University of Cambridge, UK
MPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kevin A. Glasgow
Staci M. Weiss
1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Staci M. Weiss
Zahra Khan
1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Topun Austin
3Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
4NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Topun Austin
Mark H. Johnson
1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK
6Centre for Brain & Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark H. Johnson
Jane Barlow
5Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, UK
DPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jane Barlow
Sarah Lloyd-Fox
1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah Lloyd-Fox
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Expectant parents worldwide have experienced changes in the way they give birth as a result of COVID-19, including restrictions relating to access to birthing units and the presence of birthing partners during the birth, and changes to birth plans. This paper reports the experiences of women in England.

Methods Data were obtained from both closed- and open-ended responses collected as part of the national COVID in Context of Pregnancy, Infancy and Parenting (CoCoPIP) Study online survey (n = 477 families) between 15th July 2020 – 29th March 2021. Frequency data are presented alongside the results of a sentiment analysis; the open-ended data was analysed thematically.

Results Two-thirds of expectant women reported giving birth via spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) (66.1%) and a third via caesarean section (CS) (32.6%) or ‘other’ (1.3%). Just under half (49.7%) of the CS were reported to have been elective/planned, with 47.7% being emergencies. A third (37.4%) of participants reported having no changes to their delivery, with a further 25% reporting COVID-related changes, and 37.4% reporting non-COVID related changes (e.g., medical intervention). Experiences of COVID-related changes included limited birthing options and reduced feelings of control; difficulties accessing pain-relief and assistance, and feelings of distress and anxiety. Under half of the respondents reported not knowing whether there could be someone present at the birth (44.8%), with 2.3% of respondents reporting no birthing partner being present due to COVID-related restrictions. Parental experiences of communication and advice provided by the hospital prior to delivery were mixed, with significant stress and anxiety being reported in relation to both the fluctuating guidance and lack of certainty regarding the presence of birthing partners at the birth. The sentiment analysis revealed that participant experiences of giving birth during the pandemic were predominately negative (46.9%) particularly in relation to the first national lockdown, with a smaller proportion of positive (33.2%) and neutral responses (19.9%).

Conclusion Parents reported an overall increase in birthing interventions (e.g., emergency CS), increased uncertainties related to the birth, and poor communication, leading to increased feelings of anxiety and high levels of negative emotions. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by a Medical Research Council Programme Grant MR/T003057/1 to MJ, and a UKRI Future Leaders fellowship (grant MR/S018425/1) to SLF. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the MRC or the UKRI. T.A. is supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) is a partnership between Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Cambridge, funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), TA is also supported by the NIHR Brain Injury MedTech Co-operative. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics approval for the survey was given by the University of Cambridge, Psychology Research Ethics Committee (PREC) (PRE.2020.077).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵* Joint senior authors

Data Availability

Qualitative data generated and analysed during the study will not be made publicly available due to ethical and privacy restrictions, however researchers can submit a research proposal to the Data Sharing Management Committee to request access and collaboration.

  • List of abbreviations

    NHS
    National Health Service
    RCM
    Royal College of Midwives
    CS
    Caesarean section
    PTSD
    Post-traumatic stress disorder
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted July 06, 2021.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19
    Ezra Aydin, Kevin A. Glasgow, Staci M. Weiss, Zahra Khan, Topun Austin, Mark H. Johnson, Jane Barlow, Sarah Lloyd-Fox
    medRxiv 2021.07.05.21260022; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.05.21260022
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19
    Ezra Aydin, Kevin A. Glasgow, Staci M. Weiss, Zahra Khan, Topun Austin, Mark H. Johnson, Jane Barlow, Sarah Lloyd-Fox
    medRxiv 2021.07.05.21260022; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.05.21260022

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (430)
    • Allergy and Immunology (756)
    • Anesthesia (221)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (3294)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
    • Dermatology (279)
    • Emergency Medicine (479)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
    • Epidemiology (13376)
    • Forensic Medicine (19)
    • Gastroenterology (899)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5153)
    • Geriatric Medicine (482)
    • Health Economics (783)
    • Health Informatics (3269)
    • Health Policy (1140)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
    • Hematology (431)
    • HIV/AIDS (1017)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14629)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
    • Medical Education (477)
    • Medical Ethics (127)
    • Nephrology (523)
    • Neurology (4925)
    • Nursing (262)
    • Nutrition (730)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
    • Oncology (2524)
    • Ophthalmology (724)
    • Orthopedics (281)
    • Otolaryngology (347)
    • Pain Medicine (323)
    • Palliative Medicine (90)
    • Pathology (543)
    • Pediatrics (1302)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
    • Primary Care Research (557)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4212)
    • Public and Global Health (7504)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1706)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1013)
    • Respiratory Medicine (980)
    • Rheumatology (480)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
    • Sports Medicine (424)
    • Surgery (548)
    • Toxicology (72)
    • Transplantation (236)
    • Urology (205)