Abstract
In the genome-wide association analysis of population-based biobanks, most diseases have low prevalence, which results in low detection power. One approach to tackle the problem is using family disease history, yet existing methods are unable to address type I error inflation induced by increased correlation of phenotypes among closely related samples, as well as unbalanced phenotypic distribution. We propose a new method for genetic association test with family disease history, TAPE (mixed-model-based Test with Adjusted Phenotype and Empirical saddlepoint approximation), which controls for increased phenotype correlation by adopting a two-variance-component mixed model and accounts for case-control imbalance by using empirical saddlepoint approximation. We show through simulation studies and analysis of UK-Biobank data of white British samples and KoGES data of Korean samples that the proposed method is computationally efficient and gains greater power for detection of variant-phenotype associations than common GWAS with binary traits while yielding better calibration compared to existing methods.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by NIH grants R01-HG008773 (Y.Z.), and Brain Pool Plus (BP+, Brain Pool+) Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2020H1D3A2A03100666, S.L). UK Biobank data were accessed under the accession number UKB: 45227.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This work does not need any approval of the IRB.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.