Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

High frequency transmission, asymptomatic shedding, and airborne spread of Streptococcus pyogenes among schoolchildren exposed to scarlet fever: a longitudinal multi-cohort moleculo-epidemiological contact tracing study

Rebecca Cordery, Amrit Purba, Lipi Begum, Ewurabena Mills, Mia Mosavie, Ana Vieira, View ORCID ProfileElita Jauneikaite, Rhoda CY Leung, Derren Ready, Peter Hoffman, Theresa Lamagni, View ORCID ProfileShiranee Sriskandan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.04.21259990
Rebecca Cordery
1London Health Protection Teams, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amrit Purba
1London Health Protection Teams, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lipi Begum
1London Health Protection Teams, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ewurabena Mills
2Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mia Mosavie
2Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ana Vieira
2Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
4MRC Centre for Molecular Bacteriology & Infection, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elita Jauneikaite
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
4MRC Centre for Molecular Bacteriology & Infection, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
5Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elita Jauneikaite
Rhoda CY Leung
2Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Derren Ready
6National Infection Service, Public Health England, United Kingdom
7NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Hoffman
6National Infection Service, Public Health England, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa Lamagni
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
6National Infection Service, Public Health England, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shiranee Sriskandan
2Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
4MRC Centre for Molecular Bacteriology & Infection, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shiranee Sriskandan
  • For correspondence: s.sriskandan@imperial.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Despite recommendations regarding prompt treatment of cases and enhanced hygiene measures, scarlet fever outbreaks increased in England between 2014-2018.

Methods We undertook a prospective, intensive contact tracing study in schools with consecutive scarlet fever cases to assess the impact of standard interventions on transmission of Streptococcus pyogenes between cases, classroom contacts, households, and classroom environments over 4 weeks using genome sequencing.

Findings Six classes, comprising 12 scarlet fever cases, 17 household contacts, and 278 classroom contacts were recruited. Prevalence of the outbreak strain in asymptomatic classroom contacts was high, increasing from 9.6% in week 1, to 26.9% in week 2, 23.9% in week 3, then 14.3% in week 4. Colonisation with non-outbreak strains was 0 - 7.5%. Genome sequencing showed clonality of isolates within each of six classes, confirming recent transmission accounted for high carriage. Of asymptomatic classroom contacts with S. pyogenes-positive throat swabs who were tested for transmissibility, 6/28 (21%) had positive cough plates and/or hand swabs, of whom three remained S. pyogenes-positive for 3 weeks. Only 1/60 surface swabs taken in 3 classrooms yielded S. pyogenes. In contrast, settle plates placed in elevated locations were S. pyogenes-positive in both classrooms tested.

Interpretation S. pyogenes transmission in schools is intense and may occur prior to, or in spite of reported treatment of cases, underlining a need for rapid case management. Despite guideline adherence, heavy shedding of S. pyogenes by small numbers of classroom contacts may perpetuate outbreaks, and airborne transmission has a plausible role in spread.

Funding Action Medical Research, UKRI, NIHR

Introduction

Over the last six years, England has experienced rates of scarlet fever that are unprecedented in modern times (1, 2). Scarlet fever is a highly communicable exanthem caused by Streptococcus pyogenes that predominantly affects younger children. Over 30,000 cases were notified in 2018, the highest number since 1960, with an age-specific incidence of 523 per 100,000 among 1-4 year olds in England and Wales (3). Infections have long-been recognised to seed outbreaks in schools and nurseries, creating a significant public health burden (2). Though benign if treated promptly, there is a 20-fold increased risk of invasive streptococcal infection in households that include a recent case of scarlet fever (4). In 2016, the seasonal surge in scarlet fever was associated with an almost 2-fold increase in invasive disease notifications, and emergence of a new sublineage of emm1 S. pyogenes (M1UK) that expresses increased amounts of scarlet fever toxin (5). Controlling transmission of scarlet fever is therefore a public health priority.

The literature highlights a role for fomite surfaces in propagation of S. pyogenes outbreaks (6,7). Guidance for management of two or more cases of scarlet fever emphasises the importance of maintaining good hand hygiene, prompt antibiotic treatment of index cases, and exclusion from school until 24h after antibiotic treatment has started (8). Escalation of interventions including daily cleaning of toys, utensils, and frequent touch points is recommended if necessary, along with daily vacuuming of soft furnishings (8).

To understand why outbreaks might continue to occur despite following these interventions, we investigated S. pyogenes transmission during the scarlet fever seasons of 2018 and 2019, focussing on educational settings with two sequential notifications of scarlet fever. Our primary aim was to determine if existing guidance that focuses on hygiene, alongside case exclusion, prevented transmission of S. pyogenes in the classroom. Our secondary aim was to investigate modes of transmission, to inform future guidance and provide insight into S. pyogenes outbreaks more generally.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study in Greater London from March 1 2018 to May 31 2019. Confirmed and probable cases of scarlet fever were identified by notifications to local Health Protection Teams. (Appendix p2).

Schools and nurseries were invited to participate if they had two confirmed or probable scarlet fever cases aged 2-8 years from the same class within ten days of each other, with the most recent case arising in the preceding 48h. Routine public health advice was provided including cases being excluded from school until the case had received at least 24h of antibiotic treatment (8).

Cases were invited to participate in daily sampling as soon as possible after diagnosis and up to day 8 of treatment, followed by samples collected at weekly intervals for 3 more weeks, comprising throat swabs, hand swabs, and Columbia Blood Agar (CBA) cough plates.

Household and classroom contacts of each case were invited to participate in weekly throat swab sampling for 4 weeks, or a total of 4 occasions if the weekly cycle was interrupted by holidays. In 2019, classroom contacts were additionally asked to provide hand swabs and cough plates. Any child found to have clinical pharyngitis or scarlet fever was directed to their primary care physician for management; swab results were not reported to participants or their physicians.

Environmental swabs were obtained from 20 frequently-touched items including toys and equipment in each classroom in 2018 (Appendix p20). In 2019, to sample classroom air, CBA settle plates were positioned in each classroom at heights of ∼1.5-2m for 2-3h.

After overnight culture of samples on CBA, DNA was extracted from any S. pyogenes identified and emm genotyping performed, followed by genome sequencing, as detailed (Appendix p20). Genome sequences were compared with S. pyogenes sequences from an earlier survey of isolates associated with scarlet fever (9) (Appendix p9-15, p20-21); emm1 and emm4 lineages were assigned as reported (5, 10). Genome sequencing data are available from European Nucleotide Archive using the reference PRJEB43915.

The study protocol was approved by a Research Ethics Committee (reference 18/LO/0025; IRAS 225006). Informed consent was provided by parents or guardians, and assent provided by each child.

Role of Funding source

The funders played no role in study design, data interpretation, writing the report or decision to submit the paper for publication

Results

During the study, 156 educational outbreaks in London were reported in 2018, and 47 in 2019. Based on a pragmatic approach, the first school with 2 eligible cases that agreed to participate each month was selected. Six settings were included, and 12 cases were recruited (Appendix, p3). Two cases were recruited per setting in settings 1-3; setting 2 and 3 were different classes in the same school. Three cases were recruited from each of settings 4 and 6. Cases declined to participate in setting 5, although contact and environment testing was undertaken based on one confirmed and one probable case (Appendix, p3). During the study, participating schools reported increased prevalence of pharyngitis in addition to the reported cases of scarlet fever. The median attack rate for confirmed and probable cases was 5.1% in the settings studied. (Appendix, p3)

Of the scarlet fever cases, 6/12 had been swabbed by primary care physicians prior to antibiotic treatment. S. pyogenes genotypes associated with each outbreak were derived from the swabs obtained from these cases, or inferred from the S. pyogenes isolates cultured from household contacts of cases (Figure 1). Emm1 isolates all belonged to the newly described M1UK lineage (5), while emm4 isolates all belonged to the M4-complete lineage (10).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship between S. pyogenes isolates sequenced from cases, contacts and environment in each setting.

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed from 20,229 core SNPs (without recombination regions) extracted after mapping 136 S. pyogenes isolates to the complete emm89 reference sequence (Refseq) H293 (HG316453.2, filled-in black circle). The tree was drawn in a circular layout with tips coloured based on the settings (S1-S6). The shape of the tip indicate sample sources as follows: case; classroom contact (CC); household contact (HHC); and environmental samples from settle plate (Air); or Toy. The outer rings from the inner-most to the outer-most represent the year of collection and emm-type of strains. The uncommon strain subtypes within an emm- type are indicated by *. These were emm3.143 and emm6.9. For detailed analysis of each setting, see supplementary figures.

Cases were visited at home during initial periods of school exclusion. All bar one of the 12 cases received antibiotic treatment prescribed by the primary care physician. S. pyogenes was not detected in swab samples obtained during the first week, in all cases where antibiotic treatment had been initiated prior to the study visit. The child who did not receive antibiotic treatment remained throat swab positive up to and including week 2 but had cleared emm4 S. pyogenes by week 3 (Table 1 and Appendix p4-5). One contact who had a positive throat swab and cough plate on day 1 of week 1 with emm3.93 S. pyogenes, developed scarlet fever the same day, so was recruited as a case. Where the duration of antibiotic treatment was known (8/12 cases), 4 children completed a 10-day course, and 4 took an incomplete course (including 2 cases where a 7-day course was prescribed). Of those that had received antibiotic treatment, including those who completed a full 10-day course, the throat swab grew S. pyogenes in 4/12 cases (33%), either in week 2 (2 cases) or week 3 (2 cases), with the outbreak strain. One of the latter cases, carrying M1UK, was also cough-plate and hand-swab positive in week 3 despite previously testing negative. (Table 1 and Appendix p4-5).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1. S. pyogenes carriage and shedding in cases of scarlet fever

Seventeen household contacts were enrolled in the study, representing 9 households. Of these, 3/17 (17.6%) had throat swabs that yielded S. pyogenes, two of whom had symptomatic pharyngitis with M1UK and demonstrated carriage spanning 2 or 3 weeks. (Table 2 and Appendix p6)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2. S. pyogenes outbreak strain prevalence in household contacts

Classroom contacts were swabbed in school. Mean asymptomatic throat carriage of the genomically-defined outbreak S. pyogenes strains among participating children who had swabs rose from 9.6% in week 1; to 26.9% in week 2; to 23.9% in week 3; and 14.3% in week 4. This fell to 11.3%, then 0% in classes where delayed swabbing was undertaken. (Table 3). In contrast to carriage of the outbreak strain, median carriage of non-outbreak S. pyogenes was 3.9% (range 0-7.5%) during the study (Table 3). Transmission appeared particularly intense in setting 2, where 44.4% of children swabbed were infected with the outbreak M1UK strain in week 2, in addition to the two household contacts (Figure 2). Overall, across all six settings, more than half of eligible children participated in the study (mean participation rate 54.5%, range 38.9%-75.8%). (Appendix p7).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3. S. pyogenes outbreak strain throat swab prevalence in classroom contacts
Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2. Transmission of S. pyogenes within households and classroom contacts in setting 2.

(A) Weekly swab results from two cases and associated household contacts. Each row represents one subject, each column represents one week. Blue icon, negative throat swab result; pink icon, throat swab yielded S. pyogenes. Glow indicates cough plate and hand swab also positive. Each case had commenced antibiotic treatment prior to joining study, without prior GP swab. Household contacts had not received antibiotics but were resident with each case. Cases and household contacts were swabbed weekly for three weeks; cases were swabbed 2-3 times in week 1, result for single swab shown, representative of other swabs in same week. All S. pyogenes isolates were identical M1UK. (B) Classroom contacts had throat swabs weekly for three weeks after identification of case; each icon represents an individual child (n=22), grouped by week of swabbing. Blue icon, negative throat swab culture; pink icon, positive swab culture (S. pyogenes); grey, participant not swabbed, as absent or declined. Of children swabbed, over 50% were positive in weeks 2 and 3. Overall 10/22 (45.5%) children had at least one positive throat swab at any time during the study period. 8/10 had outbreak M1UK strain (1/10, emm6; 1/10, emm12). Icons do not indicate sex of participants.

Whole genome sequencing was undertaken on all S. pyogenes isolates identified during the study. Within each setting, isolates of the same genotype were clonal, with individual strains being a median of 0 SNPs (range 0-5 SNPs) different to other strains in that setting, consistent with a common source of transmission, but a median of 12 SNPs (range 4-55 SNPs) different from the closest strain of the same genotype sequenced in 2014. Core genomes exhibited more similarity than expected. (Figure 1 and Appendix p16-19).

To investigate the potential role of surface contamination of fomites in transmission, environmental swabs were taken in each of 3 classrooms in week 1 of the first year of the study. Routine advice on cleaning (8) had been issued prior to environmental sampling. Swabs from settings 1-3 yielded mixed bacterial growth (∼1 × 102 cfu – 1 × 104 cfu per swab). (Appendix p8) S. pyogenes was identified from just one toy (train track) from setting 2; 5 colonies/swab of the outbreak strain emm1 (M1UK) were 1-3 SNPs different to isolates obtained from children in the same class (Appendix p17).

To determine the source of ongoing transmission in the classrooms, the protocol was amended in year 2 (2019) to include hand-swabs and cough-plates from classroom contacts in addition to throat swabs, while CBA settle plates were used to sample air in the classroom. In setting 4, where emm4 predominated, one of four children carrying S. pyogenes was cough-plate positive in the second week, but not in subsequent weeks; all isolates in this setting were 0 SNP apart. Cough-plates were negative in setting 5 (also emm4 where again isolates were 0 SNP apart) (Appendix p18). In setting 6, where emm3.93 S. pyogenes dominated, cough-plates were positive for the outbreak emm3.93 strain in a quarter of children who had positive throat swabs (week 1, 2/7; week 2, 3/12, week 3, 2/9). (Figure 3) The vast majority of strains were 0 SNP different from one another, bar three strains that were 1, 2, and 5 SNP apart (Appendix p19). SNPs differentiating strains within each outbreak are listed (Appendix p9).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3. Transmission of S. pyogenes within households and classroom contacts over 3 weeks in setting 6.

(A). Weekly swab results from three cases and associated household contacts; third case recruited from contacts on day 1, though household not recruited. Each row represents one household, each column represents one week. Blue icon, negative throat swab result; pink icon, throat swab yielded S. pyogenes. Glow indicates cough plate positive. Cases 1 and 2 commenced antibiotic treatment prior to first swab; Case 3 commenced antibiotic treatment after first swab. Household contacts had not received antibiotics but were resident with each case. Cases and household contacts were swabbed weekly for three weeks. All S. pyogenes isolates were identical emm3.93.

(B) Classroom contacts had throat swabs weekly for three weeks after identification of cases 1 and 2; each icon represents an individual child (n=34), arranged by week. Blue icon, negative throat swab culture; pink icon, positive throat swab culture (S. pyogenes); grey, participant not swabbed as absent or declined. Glow indicates cough plate and/or hand plate positive. Of children who had swabs taken, S. pyogenes was identified in 25%, 35%, and 31% in weeks 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The outbreak strain emm3.93 was identified in 21.4%, 26.5%, and 18.75% of children who had swabs taken in weeks 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Fourth week not shown. Settle plates were positive for emm3.93 S. pyogenes in 2/4 locations in each of the three weeks. Icons do not indicate sex of participants.

To compare the prevalence of S. pyogenes carriage during the peak outbreak period with prevalence of carriage ∼3 months later, the protocol was amended to incorporate a ‘break’ in the weekly sampling schedule in year 2. In setting 4, where prevalence of the outbreak emm4 S. pyogenes had been 0%, 20%, and 16.6% in weeks 1-3 respectively, final samples from classroom contacts were taken in week 16, and all were negative. It was only possible to incorporate a 4-week gap for settings 5 and 6 for logistic reasons related to the timing of the school term. In setting 5, carriage of the outbreak emm4 strain remained steady throughout the study, with a prevalence of 0, 13.6%, 13.6% in weeks 1-3 respectively and 12.5% at week Notably 2/3 of emm4 carriers who were positive in week 7 had also been positive in week 3. In setting 6, where prevalence of emm3.93 S. pyogenes in weeks 1, 2, and 3 was 25%, 35.3%, 29% respectively in asymptomatic classroom contacts, carriage fell to 16.7% (5/30) by week 8. Of these, 4/5 strains carried were the outbreak emm3.93 strain. (Figure 3) Notably in this outbreak, throat swabs from two of the cases and a single household contact were positive in week 3, emm3.93 (Table 3).

Four settle plates were used per classroom to sample room air, sited above child head height (1.5m-2m). A pilot study in setting 4 revealed that plates left for 24h were overgrown and un-readable. Therefore, for settings 5 and 6, settle plates were left for ∼2-3h while children were using the classroom. In setting 5, one of four settle plates (placed above a whiteboard) was positive for S. pyogenes in weeks 2 and 3 of the study (Table 4). In setting 6, two of four settle plates were positive for S. pyogenes in weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the study, including plates placed at a height of ∼2m, on top of cupboards. In both settings, S. pyogenes strains on settle plates were identical to strains identified in children (emm4 and emm3.93), consistent with the outbreak strain being dispersed into the air (Appendix p18-19).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4. Air settle plate results from settings 5 and 6.

Discussion

This prospective contact tracing study of S. pyogenes transmission was undertaken in response to an unprecedented rise in scarlet fever notifications in England. Using genome sequencing to confirm common sources of transmission, we found a high prevalence of the outbreak strain among asymptomatic classroom contacts, peaking in the second week of our investigations. Transmission had occurred in the presence of antibiotic treatment and exclusion of index cases, and regardless of implementation of standard hygiene measures within the classrooms. Enhanced sampling in year 2 revealed evidence of prominent S. pyogenes shedding by some children, and airborne dispersal of genomically identical strains in the classroom.

In the six settings investigated, emm1 (M1UK) strains were involved in two outbreaks, emm4 in two outbreaks, and emm3.93 and emm6 strains were involved in one outbreak each. New scarlet fever-causing lineages have been associated with national upsurges in invasive S. pyogenes (5, 11), exemplified by emergence of M1UK, a lineage that expresses increased levels of the scarlet fever toxin SpeA (5). There are however international differences in approach to treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis (12), and transmission risks are not widely considered (13). Coupled with the public health impact of outbreaks (2), high attack rates in schools (14), and increased risk of invasive infections (4), there is a rationale to limit the spread of S. pyogenes in the population, particularly where lineages such as emm1 and emm3, that are independently associated with high case fatality or severe manifestations (15), are involved.

Current guidance on scarlet fever management focusses on treatment, exclusion, and hygiene interventions, with escalation to include daily cleaning of surfaces (8). Although contamination of fomites including toys is no doubt important, we found that transmission was ongoing despite such cleaning and in the absence of frequent surface S. pyogenes contamination. Indeed, the main source of S. pyogenes appeared to be the children themselves. Other than foodborne scarlet fever outbreaks (16), there are remarkably few recent investigations that examine transmission routes. Four contemporary reports describe scarlet fever outbreaks with high attack rates (23-72%) in educational settings that were not controlled by standard interventions (17-20); transmission routes were investigated in just one (17). Three describe use of antibiotic treatment to end the outbreaks, treating all colonised children (17-19). Microbiological detection of S. pyogenes to enable treatment of children found to be colonised would however be challenging to undertake routinely for all scarlet fever outbreaks. Our study underlines a need for research to evaluate a potential role for molecular point of care tests for rapid detection of colonisation and outbreak management.

By week 3, prevalence of the genomically-confirmed outbreak strain was 14-47% across the six settings, while carriage of non-outbreak strains was infrequent. These carriage rates are remarkably similar to data from higher attack rate outbreaks (17-20) and studies from the pre-antibiotic era, where 26-33% of streptococcal pharyngitis classroom contacts were observed to carry the outbreak serotype (21). Our study draws attention to the importance of context when measuring S. pyogenes carriage rates as, outside of the springtime outbreak season, asymptomatic carriage in healthy children in England is estimated to be just 0 - 5.9% (22) in contrast to the prevalence detected during the settings described herein. In healthy adults, in England, asymptomatic carriage of S. pyogenes is also reportedly low (∼0.45%) but can also rise to 17% in an outbreak setting (23). Studies that report average annual rates of asymptomatic carriage therefore fail to recognise the very major impact of seasonal variation and outbreaks and may provide misleading contextual information when providing recommendations.

We frequently recovered the outbreak strain among classroom contacts in week 1 of sampling, indicating that transmission had already occurred in the classroom, whether from one of the index cases of scarlet fever or another unknown source. It is possible that treatment may have been delayed in some cases: Enhanced surveillance suggests one fifth of scarlet fever cases may be initially diagnosed as a viral infection, allowing transmission to continue if the affected child remains in school, untreated (24). Whether this is sufficient to explain scarlet fever outbreaks merits further analysis and modelling. In our study, once scarlet fever cases were recognised, all bar one child received antibiotics and remained isolated for at least 24h of antibiotic treatment. We found no evidence of continued infection or carriage in weeks 1 or 2 in cases who received antibiotics.

It is generally believed that asymptomatic carriage is unlikely to lead to transmission, although the term ‘carrier’ is more often used to refer to a case that has been treated for S. pyogenes pharyngitis but demonstrates microbiological failure (25). In our study, the systematic increase in prevalence of outbreak strains between weeks 1 and 2 in classroom contacts pointed to ongoing transmission from asymptomatic carriers, despite index cases having been excluded and treated. Indeed, after returning to school, four cases re-acquired the outbreak strain in week 3, presumably through contact with other colonised contacts or classroom air, although did not develop symptomatic illness; these cases re-acquired emm1 (M1UK, 2 cases) and emm3.93 (2 cases). Our investigations using cough plates and hand swabs demonstrated that up to 40% of asymptomatic carriers were shedding more S. pyogenes than other children in exhaled cough and on hands. These findings raise a question about the definition of colonisation and infection in young children, who may not be able to identify their symptoms, or may be infectious without symptoms. The study confirms the existence of so-called heavy shedders among those who are apparently asymptomatic at the time of sampling.

Settle plates placed in elevated locations for just 2-3 hours, provided evidence of S. pyogenes dispersal in classroom air in settings 5 and 6; the timing of settle plate positivity coincided with more intense periods of asymptomatic shedding. Settle plates provide an easy read out in an outbreak setting and could be used to indicate a need for improved ventilation, social distancing, or surveillance for heavy shedders. Airborne spread of scarlet fever-causing streptococci was recognised as a threat in hospitals in the 1930’s (26) but the focus for control of S. pyogenes outbreaks in modern times has largely focussed on the role of fomite spread and the importance of hygiene (6-8). Contemporary outbreaks of S. pyogenes that are not explained by direct contact alone suggest a need to take not only indirect contact but also airborne transmission into consideration when developing guidelines.

The classroom setting has provided an unexpected human model for S. pyogenes infection. Children of the same age were exposed to a presumed similar inoculum of S. pyogenes in class, yet only ∼5% developed scarlet fever, some of whom re-acquired the outbreak strain without illness three weeks later, while some anecdotally developed pharyngitis. Others were found to asymptomatically shed S. pyogenes for several weeks, while others showed transient colonisation, or no infection whatsoever. Our understanding of immunity to S. pyogenes is heavily dominated by factors that influence susceptibility to invasive disease. The findings highlight a gap in our knowledge regarding mucosal immunity to S. pyogenes, specifically whether full immunity requires antibodies to prevent streptococcal adherence, promote bacterial clearance, and inhibit streptococcal virulence factors during pharyngitis. This is potentially critical to vaccine development. Coupled with differences in host genetic susceptibility and oral microbiota, differing layers of immunity could go some way to explain why children express a range of disease phenotypes.

There are limitations to our study. Sampling of fomites was limited to single timepoints in year 1, while settle plates to sample air were only used in year 2, restricting ability to determine the relative importance of each transmission route. Our study was based in London, so findings may not be relevant to rural, or low- and middle-income settings. Upsurges in scarlet fever have been described in other temperate regions, such as China (27), where transmission may be influenced by climate or pollution. Furthermore, transmission intensity may be seasonal; we attempted to sample outside of the main scarlet fever season, but schools were unwilling to participate. Indeed, engagement was high when anxiety about scarlet fever was greatest.

The study has demonstrated that heavy asymptomatic shedding by a proportion of children may account for persistence of S. pyogenes outbreaks in classroom settings. The phenomenon of super-shedders and super-spreaders is increasingly recognised as a source of heterogeneity in infectious disease modelling (28,29) and is consistent with the explosive nature of some streptococcal outbreaks. Relevance to other respiratory infections is unclear. Our findings may explain the periodic failure of interventions focussed on hygiene alone to curtail outbreaks of S. pyogenes, both in the classroom and other institutional settings. The recognition of heavy asymptomatic shedding highlights a potential role for social distancing, improved respiratory hygiene, and better ventilation in reducing S. pyogenes transmission during outbreaks. As an unforeseen consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, implementation of these measures has proven highly successful in halting England’s scarlet fever upsurge, at least in 2020 (30), highlighting a need for better understanding of transmission routes in preventing future upsurges.

Data Availability

All data pertaining to the study is included in the supplementary files and genomics data is available via the European Nucleotide Archive, under the accession number PRJEB43915

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests

Funding

Action Medical Research (GN2596); UKRI, Medical Research Council (MR/P022669/1); NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-associated Infection and AMR; NIHR Imperial College Biomedical Research Centre (BRC).

Author contributions

Conceptualisation and funding acquisition SS, RC, TL; Project supervision and methodology SS; Recruitment supervision RC; data collection LB, AP, MM, EM, RCYL, DR, PH; data analysis AV, EJ; data visualisation RC, SS, AV, EJ; Original draft RC, SS; Review and editing AP, EJ, AV, PH, DR, RCYL, TL; Final manuscript all authors

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the schools, nurseries, and staff, as well as the many children and households who participated in this study, and the support of London Health Protection Teams in PHE. The NIHR BRC Colebrook laboratory and BRC Genomics facility are also acknowledged. EJ is a Rosetrees/Stoneygrate 2017 Imperial College Research Fellow, funded by Rosetrees Trust and the Stoneygate Trust (fellowship no. M683).

References

  1. 1.↵
    Guy R, Williams C, Irvine N, Reynolds A, Coelho J, Saliba V, Thomas D, Doherty L, Chalker V, von Wissmann B, Chand M, Efstratiou A, Ramsay M, Lamagni T. Increase in scarlet fever notifications in the United Kingdom, 2013/2014. Euro Surveill. 2014 Mar 27;19(12):20749. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.12.20749. PMID: 24698137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Lamagni T, Guy R, Chand M, Henderson KL, Chalker V, Lewis J, Saliba V, Elliot AJ, Smith GE, Rushton S, Sheridan EA, Ramsay M, Johnson AP. Resurgence of scarlet fever in England, 2014-16: a population-based surveillance. Lancet. Infectious Diseases, 27 Nov 2017, 18(2):180–187. DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30693-x. PMID: 29191628
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Public Health England, Group A streptococcal infections: first report of seasonal activity, 2018/19 Health Protection Report Volume 13 Number 8. Advanced Access report https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/782182/hpr0819_sf-gas.pdf. Accessed June 28 2021.
  4. 4.↵
    Watts V, Balasegaram S, Brown CS, Mathew S, Mearkle R, Ready D, Saliba V, Lamagni T. Increased Risk for Invasive Group A Streptococcus Disease for Household Contacts of Scarlet Fever Cases, England, 2011-2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Mar;25(3):529–537. doi: 10.3201/eid2503.181518. Epub 2019 Mar 17. PMID: 30602121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Lynskey NN, Jauneikaite E, Li HK, Zhi X, Turner CE, Mosavie M, Pearson M, Asai M, Lobkowicz L, Chow JY, Parkhill J, Lamagni T, Chalker VJ, Sriskandan S. Emergence of dominant toxigenic M1T1 Streptococcus pyogenes clone during increased scarlet fever activity in England: a population-based molecular epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;19(11):1209–1218. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30446-3. Epub 2019 Sep 10. PMID: 31519541.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Wagenvoort JH, Penders RJ, Davies BI, Lütticken R. Similar environmental survival patterns of Streptococcus pyogenes strains of different epidemiologic backgrounds and clinical severity. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases: Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 2005 Jan;24(1):65–67. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-004-1256-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Kramer A, Schwebke I, Kampf G. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Aug 16;6:130. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-130. PMID: 16914034; PMCID: PMC1564025.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Public Health England, Guidelines for the public health management of scarlet fever outbreaks in schools, nurseries and other childcare settings October 2017. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/771139/Guidelines_for_the_public_health_management_of_scarlet_fever_outbreaks pdf. Accessed June 28 2021.
  9. 9.↵
    Chalker V, Jironkin A, Coelho J, Al-Shahib A, Platt S, Kapatai G, Daniel R, Dhami C, Laranjeira M, Chambers T, Guy R, Lamagni T, Harrison T, Chand M, Johnson AP, Underwood A. Scarlet Fever Incident Management Team. Genome analysis following a national increase in Scarlet Fever in England 2014. BMC Genomics. 2017 Mar 10;18(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3603-z. PMID: 28283023; PMCID: PMC5345146
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Remmington A, Haywood S, Edgar J, Green LR, de Silva T, Turner CE. Cryptic prophages within a Streptococcus pyogenes genotype emm4 lineage. Microb Genom. 2021 Jan;7(1). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000482. Epub 2020 Nov 27. PMID: 33245690.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Al-Shahib A, Underwood A, Afshar B, et al. Emergence of a novel lineage containing a prophage in emm/M3 group A Streptococcus associated with upsurge in invasive disease in the UK [published correction appears in Microb Genom. 2016 Nov 30;2(11):e000097]. Microb Genom. 2016;2(6):e000059. Published 2016 Jun 24. doi:10.1099/mgen.0.000059
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    Matthys J, De Meyere M, van Driel ML, De Sutter A. Differences among international pharyngitis guidelines: not just academic. Ann Fam Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;5(5):436–43. doi: 10.1370/afm.741. PMID: 17893386; PMCID: PMC2000301.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) Respiratory tract infections –antibiotic prescribing. Prescribing of antibiotics for self-limiting respiratory tract infections in adults and children in primary care 2008. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg69/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-196853293. Accessed June 28 2021.
  14. 14.↵
    Ryu S, Chun BC< Invstigation of Scarlet fever outbreak in a Kindergarten, Infect Chemother, 2018 Mar;50(1):38–42 doi: 10.3947/ic.2018.50.1.38
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    Nelson GE, Pondo T, Toews KA, Farley MM, Lindegren ML, Lynfield R, Aragon D, Zansky SM, Watt JP, Cieslak PR, Angeles K, Harrison LH, Petit S, Beall B, Van Beneden CA. Epidemiology of Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections in the United States, 2005-2012. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 15;63(4):478–86. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw248. Epub 2016 Apr 22. PMID: 27105747; PMCID: PMC5776658.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Yang SG, Dong HJ, Li FR, Xie SY, Cao HC, Xia SC, Yu Z, Li LJ. Report and analysis of a scarlet fever outbreak among adults through food-borne transmission in China. J Infect. 2007 Nov;55(5):419–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2007.07.011. Epub 2007 Aug 27. PMID: 17719644
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Falck G, Kjellander J. Outbreak of group A streptococcal infection in a day-care center. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992 Nov;11(11):914–9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199211110-00002. PMID: 1454431.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    Feeney KT, Dowse GK, Keil AD, Mackaay C, McLellan D. Epidemiological features and control of an outbreak of scarlet fever in a Perth primary school. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2005;29(4):386-90. PMID: 16465930.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Hoebe CJ, Wagenvoort JH, Schellekens JF. Een epidemie van roodvonk, impetigo en faryngitis veroorzaakt door dezelfde Streptococcus pyogenes type T4M4 op een basisschool [An outbreak of scarlet fever, impetigo and pharyngitis caused by the same Streptococcus pyogenes type T4M4 in a primary school]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Nov 4;144(45):2148-52. Dutch. PMID: 11086489.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Lamden KH. An outbreak of scarlet fever in a primary school. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Apr;96(4):394–7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.189944. Epub 2010 Nov 10. PMID: 21068078.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Glover JA, Griffith F. Acute tonsillitis and some of its sequels: epidemiological and bacteriological observations. Br Med J. 1931;2(3689):521–527. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.3689.521
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Spitzer J, Hennessy E, Neville L. High group A streptococcal carriage in the Orthodox Jewish community of north Hackney. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Feb;51(463):101-5. PMID: 11217620; PMCID: PMC1313922.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Pearson M, Fallowfield JL, Davey T, Thorpe NM, Allsopp AJ, Shaw A, Wilson DR, Sriskandan S, Lamb LE. Asymptomatic group A Streptococcal throat carriage in Royal Marines recruits and Young Officers. J Infect. 2017 Jun;74(6):585–589. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 23. PMID: 28344116
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Herdman MT, Cordery R, Karo B, Purba AK, Begum L, Lamagni T, Kee C, Balasegaram S, Sriskandan S. Clinical management and impact of scarlet fever in the modern era: findings from a cross-sectional study of cases in London, 2018-2019. MedRXiv, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.25.21259535v1.full.pdf
  25. 25.↵
    DeMuri GP, Wald ER. The Group A Streptococcal Carrier State Reviewed: Still an Enigma. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2014 Dec;3(4):336–42. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piu030. Epub 2014 Apr 30: pmid:26625454.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Brown WA, Allison VD. Infection of the air of scarlet-fever wards with Streptococcus pyogenes. J Hyg (Lond). 1937 Jan;37(1):1–13. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400034768. PMID: 20475359; PMCID: PMC2199405.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Liu Y, Chan TC, Yap LW, Luo Y, Xu W, Qin S, Zhao N, Yu Z, Geng X, Liu SL. Resurgence of scarlet fever in China: a 13-year population-based surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Aug;18(8):903–912. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30231-7. Epub 2018 May 29. PMID: 29858148; PMCID: PMC7185785.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Woolhouse M. Quantifying Transmission. Microbiol Spectr. 2017 Jul;5(4). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MTBP-0005-2016. PMID: 28812540
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Adam DC, Wu P, Wong JY, Lau EHY, Tsang TK, Cauchemez S, Leung GM, Cowling BJ. Clustering and superspreading potential of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Hong Kong. Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1714–1719. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1092-0. Epub 2020 Sep 17. PMID: 32943787.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Public Health England, Group A streptococcal infections: second report on seasonal activity in England, 2019/20 Health Protection Report Volume 14 Number 10. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/887272/hpr1020_GAS-SF.pdf. Accessed June 28 2021.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 06, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High frequency transmission, asymptomatic shedding, and airborne spread of Streptococcus pyogenes among schoolchildren exposed to scarlet fever: a longitudinal multi-cohort moleculo-epidemiological contact tracing study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
High frequency transmission, asymptomatic shedding, and airborne spread of Streptococcus pyogenes among schoolchildren exposed to scarlet fever: a longitudinal multi-cohort moleculo-epidemiological contact tracing study
Rebecca Cordery, Amrit Purba, Lipi Begum, Ewurabena Mills, Mia Mosavie, Ana Vieira, Elita Jauneikaite, Rhoda CY Leung, Derren Ready, Peter Hoffman, Theresa Lamagni, Shiranee Sriskandan
medRxiv 2021.07.04.21259990; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.04.21259990
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
High frequency transmission, asymptomatic shedding, and airborne spread of Streptococcus pyogenes among schoolchildren exposed to scarlet fever: a longitudinal multi-cohort moleculo-epidemiological contact tracing study
Rebecca Cordery, Amrit Purba, Lipi Begum, Ewurabena Mills, Mia Mosavie, Ana Vieira, Elita Jauneikaite, Rhoda CY Leung, Derren Ready, Peter Hoffman, Theresa Lamagni, Shiranee Sriskandan
medRxiv 2021.07.04.21259990; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.04.21259990

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (549)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1749)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (310)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (654)
  • Epidemiology (10785)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (584)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2935)
  • Geriatric Medicine (286)
  • Health Economics (531)
  • Health Informatics (1919)
  • Health Policy (833)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (743)
  • Hematology (290)
  • HIV/AIDS (627)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12501)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (685)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (323)
  • Neurology (2786)
  • Nursing (150)
  • Nutrition (431)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (556)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1458)
  • Ophthalmology (441)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (255)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (380)
  • Pediatrics (865)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (362)
  • Primary Care Research (334)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2633)
  • Public and Global Health (5342)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1004)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (595)
  • Respiratory Medicine (724)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (125)