Abstract
This systematic review aims to identify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) which are the most frequently used and important in the Performance Evaluation (PE) of Health Care Organizations (HCOs). Also, it aimed to analyze the resulted Balanced Scorecard (BSC) dimensions during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) era. This systematic review was prepared according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases, as well as Google search engine, were inspected to find all implementations of BSC at HCOs until 20 September 2020. The Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed for each included article. The eligible studies were 33, in which 36 BSC implementations were identified. The categorization and re-grouping of the 797 KPIs resulted in 13 major-dimensions: The financial, efficiency and effectiveness, availability and quality of supplies and services, managerial tasks, Health Care Workers (HCWs) scientific development error-free and safety, the time, HCW-centeredness, patient-centeredness, technology and information system, community care and reputation, HCO building, and the communication. Under them, 45 sub-dimension were identified. The high RoB in most implementations was due to the selection bias. None of the 36 BSC implementations was utilized during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review solves the dilemma of categorization differences among BSC implementations, which in turn will improve the data sharing and comparability among studies. A modification for the BSC design to include external and managerial perspectives is required. However, a lack of a comprehensive PE for HCOs during the pandemic was observed, so the resulted dimensions and KPIs are recommended for planning, monitoring, evaluation, and continuous improvement of HCOs. Many dimensions were negatively influenced by the pandemic. However, some dimensions still need further investigation. BSC dimensions have an essential role in tackling the COVID-19 pandemic and will help the health care managers to mitigate its consequences on HCOs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
No ethical approval was required as it is a systematic review
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data underlying this article are available in the Appendices upon the request of the journal.
Abbreviations
- AACI
- American Accreditation Commission International
- AFT
- Accelerated Failure Time
- ARDS
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- BSC
- Balanced Scorecard
- CDC
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- COVID-19
- Coronavirus Disease 2019
- CSR
- Community Social Responsibility
- CSSD
- Central Sterile Supply Department
- DEA
- Data Envelopment Analysis
- DRG
- Diagnostic Related Groups
- EFQM
- European Foundation for Quality Management
- ER
- Emergency Room
- GIS
- Geographic Information System
- HAIs
- Health-Associated Infections
- HCOs
- Health Care Organizations
- HCQI
- Health Care Quality Indicator
- HCWs
- Health Care Workers
- HMIS
- Health Management Information System
- HPC
- High-Performance Computing
- HW
- Health Waste
- IC
- Infection Control
- ICU
- Intensive Care Unit
- IoT
- Internet of Things
- ISO
- International Organization for Standardization
- JCI
- Joint Commission International
- KAP
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices
- KPIs
- Key Performance Indicators
- LoS
- Length of Stay
- MBNQA
- Malcolm Baldrige National excellence model
- MBO
- Management by Objectives
- MeSH
- Medical Subject Headings
- MMA
- multi-mechanism approach
- MS
- multi-state
- NHS
- National Health System
- OECD
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
- PATH
- Performance Assessment Tool for quality improvement in Hospital
- PE
- Performance Evaluation
- PPC
- Physician-Patient Communication
- PPE
- personal protective equipment
- PRISMA
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- QOPI
- Quality Oncology Practice Initiative
- ROA
- Return on Assets
- RoB
- The Risk of Bias
- ROI
- Return On Investment
- SAQ
- Safety Attitude Questionnaire
- SQA
- Singapore Quality Award
- SSI
- Social Sustainability Indicators
- TC
- Truncation Corrected
- TI
- Technology and information
- TOPSIS
- Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution
- TQIP
- Trauma Quality Improvement Program
- TQM
- Total Quality Management
- UK
- United Kingdom
- USA
- United States of America
- USD
- United States Dollar
- VR
- Virtual Reality
- WT
- Waiting Time