Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Technology in Palliative Care (TIP): the identification of digital priorities for palliative care research using a modified Delphi method

View ORCID ProfileAmara Callistus Nwosu, Tamsin McGlinchey, Justin Sanders, Sarah Stanley, Jennifer Palfrey, Patrick Lubbers, Laura Chapman, Anne Finucane, Stephen Mason
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.24.21259307
Amara Callistus Nwosu
1Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
2Marie Curie Hospice Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
3Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amara Callistus Nwosu
  • For correspondence: a.nwosu{at}lancaster.ac.uk
Tamsin McGlinchey
4Palliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin Sanders
5Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
6Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
7Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Stanley
2Marie Curie Hospice Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Palfrey
8Princess Alice Hospice, Surrey, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Lubbers
9Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Chapman
2Marie Curie Hospice Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Finucane
10Clinical Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Mason
11Palliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Developments in digital health (describing technologies which use computing platforms, connectivity, software, and sensors for health care and related purposes) has the potential to transform the delivery of health and social care to help citizens manage their own health. Currently, we lack consensus about digital health research priorities in palliative care and lack theories about how these technologies might improve care outcomes. Global palliative care need is expected to increase due to the consequences of an ageing population; therefore, it is important for healthcare leaders to identify innovations to ensure that an increasingly frail population have appropriate access to palliative care services. Consequently, it is important to articulate research priorities as the first step to determine how we should allocate finite resources to a field saturated with rapidly developing innovations.

Aims To identify research priority areas for digital health in palliative care.

Methods We selected the digital health trends, most relevant to palliative care, from a list of emerging trends reported by the ‘Future Today Institute’. We conducted a modified Delphi process and consensus meeting with palliative care experts to identify research priorities. We used the views of public representatives to gain their perspectives of the agreed priorities.

Results One hundred and three experts (representing 11 countries) participated in the 1st Delphi round. Fifty-five participated in the 2nd round (53% of 1st round). Eleven experts attended the final consensus meeting. We identified 16 priorities areas, which were summarised into eight themes. These themes were: big data, mobile devices, telehealth and telemedicine, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, the smart home, biotechnology and digital legacy.

Conclusions The identified priorities in this paper represent a wide range of important emerging areas in field of digital health, personalised medicine, and data science. Human-centred design and robust governance systems should be considered in future research. It is important that the risks of using these technologies in palliative care are properly addressed to ensure that these tools are used meaningfully, wisely and safely and do not cause unintentional harm.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

This was a Delphi study and registration on a trial database was not required. We created a webpage to provide an study information to enable people to access details of the research study.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the following funding streams: Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Research Capability Funding (researcher salary), 20,970 GBP. Wellcome Trust, Public Engagement Grants Scheme (Public Engagement Event costs), 360 GBP. Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group (consensus meeting costs) 807 GBP. The posts of ACN and SS were funded by Marie Curie: https://www.mariecurie.org.uk/

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the University of Liverpool Ethics Committee (study approval number 3564).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Addittion of tables into main body of manuscript

Data Availability

All study data are available from teh manuscript and supplementary files.

  • LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

    AI
    Artificial Intelligence
    EHR
    Electronic Health Records
    ePROM
    electronic patient-reported measures
    FTI
    Future Today Institute
    ML
    Machine learning
    NHS
    National Health Service
    NLP
    Natural Language Processing
    PACD
    Physical Activity Change Detection
    PGHD
    Patient-Generated Health Data
    PROMs
    Patient reported outcome measures
    VR
    Virtual Reality
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted July 03, 2021.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Technology in Palliative Care (TIP): the identification of digital priorities for palliative care research using a modified Delphi method
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Technology in Palliative Care (TIP): the identification of digital priorities for palliative care research using a modified Delphi method
    Amara Callistus Nwosu, Tamsin McGlinchey, Justin Sanders, Sarah Stanley, Jennifer Palfrey, Patrick Lubbers, Laura Chapman, Anne Finucane, Stephen Mason
    medRxiv 2021.06.24.21259307; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.24.21259307
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Technology in Palliative Care (TIP): the identification of digital priorities for palliative care research using a modified Delphi method
    Amara Callistus Nwosu, Tamsin McGlinchey, Justin Sanders, Sarah Stanley, Jennifer Palfrey, Patrick Lubbers, Laura Chapman, Anne Finucane, Stephen Mason
    medRxiv 2021.06.24.21259307; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.24.21259307

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Palliative Medicine
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (430)
    • Allergy and Immunology (756)
    • Anesthesia (221)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (3294)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
    • Dermatology (279)
    • Emergency Medicine (479)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
    • Epidemiology (13376)
    • Forensic Medicine (19)
    • Gastroenterology (899)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5153)
    • Geriatric Medicine (482)
    • Health Economics (783)
    • Health Informatics (3269)
    • Health Policy (1140)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
    • Hematology (431)
    • HIV/AIDS (1017)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14629)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
    • Medical Education (477)
    • Medical Ethics (127)
    • Nephrology (523)
    • Neurology (4925)
    • Nursing (262)
    • Nutrition (730)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
    • Oncology (2524)
    • Ophthalmology (724)
    • Orthopedics (281)
    • Otolaryngology (347)
    • Pain Medicine (323)
    • Palliative Medicine (90)
    • Pathology (543)
    • Pediatrics (1302)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
    • Primary Care Research (557)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4212)
    • Public and Global Health (7504)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1706)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1013)
    • Respiratory Medicine (980)
    • Rheumatology (480)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
    • Sports Medicine (424)
    • Surgery (548)
    • Toxicology (72)
    • Transplantation (236)
    • Urology (205)