Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Hospital profiling using Bayesian decision theory

View ORCID ProfileJohannes Hengelbrock, View ORCID ProfileJohannes Rauh, View ORCID ProfileJona Cederbaum, Maximilian Kähler, View ORCID ProfileMichael Höhle
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.23.21259367
Johannes Hengelbrock
1Federal Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare, Berlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Johannes Hengelbrock
  • For correspondence: johannes.hengelbrock@iqtig.org
Johannes Rauh
1Federal Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare, Berlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Johannes Rauh
Jona Cederbaum
1Federal Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare, Berlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jona Cederbaum
Maximilian Kähler
1Federal Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare, Berlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Höhle
1Federal Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare, Berlin
2Department of Mathematics, Stockholm University, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Höhle
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background For evaluating the quality of care provided by hospitals, special interest lies in the identification of performance outliers. We study a setting where the decision to classify hospitals as performance outliers or non-outliers is based on the observed result of a single binary quality indicator.

Methods We propose to embed the classification of providers into a Bayesian decision theoretical framework which enables the derivation of optimal decision rules with respect to the expected decision consequences. We argue that these consequences depend upon for which pathway to quality improvement the profiling of hospitals takes place. We propose paradigmatic utility functions for the two pathways external reporting and change in care delivery and compare the resulting optimal decision rules with regard to their threshold values, sensitivity and specificity. We further apply them to the area of hip replacement surgeries by analyzing data from the mandatory German hospital profiling program. Based on five quality indicators, we re-evaluate the performance of 1,277 hospitals which treated over 180,000 patients for hip-replacement surgeries during 2017.

Results Based on the utilities we assigned to the classification decisions, the decision rule for change in care delivery classifies more high-volume providers as outliers compared to the decision rule for external reporting, with consequences for both sensitivity and specificity. The re-evaluation of the five quality indicators illustrates that classification decisions are highly dependent upon the underlying utilities.

Conclusion Analyzing the classification of hospitals as a decision theoretic problem and considering pathway-specific consequences of decisions can help to derive an appropriate decision rule. Contrasting decision rules with regard to their underlying assumptions about the utilities of classification consequences can be helpful to make implicit assumptions transparent and justifiable.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The data are collected and analyzed as part of the mandatory routine external quality assurance program in Germany based on paragraph 136ff SGB V. Thus, no ethical approval of the study was necessary.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data are collected and analyzed as part of the mandatory routine external quality assurance program in Germany based on paragraph 136ff SGB V. The data are part of the public reporting occuring under the rules of paragraph 137 Abs. 3 Satz 1 Nr. 4 SGB V (Qualitaetsbericht der Krankenhaeuser; Qb-R) for the reporting year 2017. The quality reports of the hospitals are only used in part. A complete, unchanged representation of the quality reports of the hospitals is available at https://www.g-ba.de, where data usage can also be requested.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 27, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hospital profiling using Bayesian decision theory
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Hospital profiling using Bayesian decision theory
Johannes Hengelbrock, Johannes Rauh, Jona Cederbaum, Maximilian Kähler, Michael Höhle
medRxiv 2021.06.23.21259367; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.23.21259367
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Hospital profiling using Bayesian decision theory
Johannes Hengelbrock, Johannes Rauh, Jona Cederbaum, Maximilian Kähler, Michael Höhle
medRxiv 2021.06.23.21259367; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.23.21259367

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (175)
  • Allergy and Immunology (423)
  • Anesthesia (97)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (902)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (172)
  • Dermatology (102)
  • Emergency Medicine (257)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (408)
  • Epidemiology (8810)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (405)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1871)
  • Geriatric Medicine (179)
  • Health Economics (389)
  • Health Informatics (1294)
  • Health Policy (644)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (495)
  • Hematology (207)
  • HIV/AIDS (397)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10593)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (565)
  • Medical Education (193)
  • Medical Ethics (52)
  • Nephrology (218)
  • Neurology (1770)
  • Nursing (105)
  • Nutrition (267)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (344)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (461)
  • Oncology (968)
  • Ophthalmology (285)
  • Orthopedics (107)
  • Otolaryngology (177)
  • Pain Medicine (118)
  • Palliative Medicine (43)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (560)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (266)
  • Primary Care Research (221)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1847)
  • Public and Global Health (3998)
  • Radiology and Imaging (657)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (344)
  • Respiratory Medicine (538)
  • Rheumatology (216)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (178)
  • Sports Medicine (167)
  • Surgery (199)
  • Toxicology (37)
  • Transplantation (107)
  • Urology (80)