Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

An empirical assessment of influenza intensity thresholds obtained from the moving epidemic and WHO methods

View ORCID ProfileJohannes Bracher, Jonas M. Littek
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.22.21259305
Johannes Bracher
1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Chair of Statistics and Econometrics
2Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Computational Statistics Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Johannes Bracher
  • For correspondence: johannes.bracher@kit.edu
Jonas M. Littek
1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Chair of Statistics and Econometrics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The moving epidemic method (MEM) and the WHO method are widely used to determine intensity levels for seasonal influenza. The two approaches are conceptually similar, but differ in two aspects. Firstly, the MEM involves a log transformation of incidence data, while the WHO method operates on the original scale. Secondly, the MEM uses more than one observation from each past season to compute intensity thresholds, fixing the total number to include. The WHO method uses only the highest value from each season. To assess the impact of these choices on thresholds we perform simulation studies which are based on re-sampling of ILI data from France, Spain, Switzerland and the US. When no transformation is applied, a rather large proportion of season peaks are classified as high or very high intensity. This can be mitigated by a logarithmic transformation. When fixing the total number of included past observations, thresholds increase the more seasons are available. When only few are available, there is a high chance of classifying new season peaks as high or very high intensity. We therefore suggest using one observation per season and a log transformation, i.e. a hybrid of the default settings of the MEM and WHO methods.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Johannes Bracher was supported by the Helmholtz Foundation via the SIMCARD Information and Data Science Pilot Project.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study uses exclusively publicly available epidemiological data at the national level. No ethics approval was necessary.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Materials to reproduce the presented results are available at https://github.com/jbracher/mem.

https://github.com/jbracher/mem

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 24, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An empirical assessment of influenza intensity thresholds obtained from the moving epidemic and WHO methods
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
An empirical assessment of influenza intensity thresholds obtained from the moving epidemic and WHO methods
Johannes Bracher, Jonas M. Littek
medRxiv 2021.06.22.21259305; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.22.21259305
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
An empirical assessment of influenza intensity thresholds obtained from the moving epidemic and WHO methods
Johannes Bracher, Jonas M. Littek
medRxiv 2021.06.22.21259305; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.22.21259305

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (163)
  • Allergy and Immunology (416)
  • Anesthesia (92)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (865)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (159)
  • Dermatology (98)
  • Emergency Medicine (251)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (397)
  • Epidemiology (8587)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (390)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1765)
  • Geriatric Medicine (168)
  • Health Economics (373)
  • Health Informatics (1250)
  • Health Policy (624)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (470)
  • Hematology (197)
  • HIV/AIDS (379)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10333)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (553)
  • Medical Education (192)
  • Medical Ethics (51)
  • Nephrology (214)
  • Neurology (1691)
  • Nursing (97)
  • Nutrition (252)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (328)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (451)
  • Oncology (930)
  • Ophthalmology (264)
  • Orthopedics (102)
  • Otolaryngology (172)
  • Pain Medicine (114)
  • Palliative Medicine (40)
  • Pathology (254)
  • Pediatrics (538)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (255)
  • Primary Care Research (209)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1782)
  • Public and Global Health (3863)
  • Radiology and Imaging (626)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (322)
  • Respiratory Medicine (522)
  • Rheumatology (208)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (170)
  • Sports Medicine (158)
  • Surgery (191)
  • Toxicology (36)
  • Transplantation (101)
  • Urology (76)