ABSTRACT
The SARS Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic presents new scientific and scale-up challenges for diagnostic capabilities worldwide. The gold standard diagnostic for SARS-CoV-2 infection is a reverse transcription/quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) which targets the viral genome, an assay that has now been performed on millions of patient specimens worldwide regardless of symptomatic status. Recently Zhang et al. suggested the possibility that the SARS-CoV-2 N gene could integrate into host cell DNA through the action of the LINE-1 retrotransposon, a mobile element that is potentially active in human somatic cells, thereby calling into question the veracity of N-gene based RT-qPCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Accordingly, we assessed the potential impact of these purported integration events on nasal swab specimens tested at our clinical laboratory. Using an N-gene based RT-qPCR assay, we tested 768 arbitrarily selected specimens and identified 2 samples which resulted in a positive detection of viral sequence in the absence of reverse transcriptase, a necessary but not sufficient signal consistent with possible integration of the SARS-CoV-2 N gene into the host genome. Regardless of possible viral N gene integration into the genome, in this small subset of samples, all patients were still positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, as indicated by a much lower Ct value for reactions performed in the presence of reverse transcriptase (RT) versus reactions performed without RT. Moreover, one of the two positives observed in the absence of RT also tested positive when using primers targeting ORF1ab, a gene closer to the 5’ end of the genome. These data are inconsistent with the N gene integration hypothesis suggested by the studies by Zhang et al., and importantly, our results suggest little to no practical impact of possible SARS-CoV-2 genome integration events on RT-qPCR testing.
COMPETING INTEREST STATEMENT The authors of this study are employees of the Pandemic Response Lab (PRL)/ReOpen Diagnostics, a private company performing SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR based testing, an area of interest of this study.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors of this study are employees of the Pandemic Response Lab (PRL)/ReOpen Diagnostics, a private company performing SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR based testing, an area of interest of this study.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received for this study
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All remanent samples are de-identified and therefore no IRB oversight was necessary. IRB exemption for this submission was obtained through WCGIRB review and approval(www.WCGIRB.com).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are submitted with this manuscript
