Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Relative perceived importance of different settings for SARS-CoV2 acquisition in England and Wales: Analysis of the Virus Watch Community Cohort

View ORCID ProfileSarah Beale, View ORCID ProfileThomas Byrne, View ORCID ProfileEllen Fragaszy, Jana Kovar, View ORCID ProfileVincent Nguyen, Anna Aryee, View ORCID ProfileWing Lam Erica Fong, View ORCID ProfileCyril Geismar, View ORCID ProfileParth Patel, View ORCID ProfileMadhumita Shrotri, Nicholas Patni, Isobel Braithwaite, View ORCID ProfileAnnalan M D Navaratnam, View ORCID ProfileRobert W Aldridge, View ORCID ProfileAndrew Hayward on behalf of Virus Watch Collaborative
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.11.21258730
Sarah Beale
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
2Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah Beale
Thomas Byrne
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas Byrne
Ellen Fragaszy
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
3Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ellen Fragaszy
Jana Kovar
2Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Nguyen
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
2Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vincent Nguyen
Anna Aryee
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wing Lam Erica Fong
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Wing Lam Erica Fong
Cyril Geismar
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
2Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cyril Geismar
Parth Patel
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Parth Patel
Madhumita Shrotri
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Madhumita Shrotri
Nicholas Patni
4University of Oxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Divisional Office University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isobel Braithwaite
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annalan M D Navaratnam
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
2Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Annalan M D Navaratnam
Robert W Aldridge
1Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Robert W Aldridge
  • For correspondence: r.aldridge{at}ucl.ac.uk
Andrew Hayward
2Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew Hayward
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

We aimed to assess the relative importance of different settings for SARS-CoV2 transmission in a large community cohort. We demonstrate the importance of home, work and education as venues for transmission. In children, education was most important and in older adults essential shopping was of high importance. Our findings support public health messaging about infection control at home, advice on working from home and restrictions in different venues.

Competing Interest Statement

ACH serves on the UK New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group.

Funding Statement

The research costs for the study have been supported by the MRC Grant Ref: MC_PC 19070 awarded to UCL on 30 March 2020 and MRC Grant Ref: MR/V028375/1 awarded on 17 August 2020. The study also received $15,000 of Facebook advertising credit to support a pilot social media recruitment campaign on 18th August 2020. This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust through a Wellcome Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship to RA [206602] and a Clinical PhD Fellowship to AA [206441/Z/17/Z]. SB and TB are supported by an MRC doctoral studentship (MR/N013867/1).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Virus Watch study has been approved by the Hampstead NHS Health Research Authority Ethics Committee. Ethics approval number - 20/HRA/2320.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

We aim to share aggregate data from this project on our website and via a "Findings so far" section on our website - https://ucl-virus-watch.net/. We will also be sharing individual record-level data on a research data-sharing service such as the Office of National Statistics Secure Research Service. In sharing the data we will work within the principles set out in the UKRI Guidance on best practice in the management of research data. Access to use of the data whilst research is being conducted will be managed by the Chief Investigators (ACH and RWA) in accordance with the principles set out in the UKRI guidance on best practice in the management of research data. We will put analysis code on publicly available repositories to enable their reuse.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 16, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Relative perceived importance of different settings for SARS-CoV2 acquisition in England and Wales: Analysis of the Virus Watch Community Cohort
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Relative perceived importance of different settings for SARS-CoV2 acquisition in England and Wales: Analysis of the Virus Watch Community Cohort
Sarah Beale, Thomas Byrne, Ellen Fragaszy, Jana Kovar, Vincent Nguyen, Anna Aryee, Wing Lam Erica Fong, Cyril Geismar, Parth Patel, Madhumita Shrotri, Nicholas Patni, Isobel Braithwaite, Annalan M D Navaratnam, Robert W Aldridge, Andrew Hayward
medRxiv 2021.06.11.21258730; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.11.21258730
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Relative perceived importance of different settings for SARS-CoV2 acquisition in England and Wales: Analysis of the Virus Watch Community Cohort
Sarah Beale, Thomas Byrne, Ellen Fragaszy, Jana Kovar, Vincent Nguyen, Anna Aryee, Wing Lam Erica Fong, Cyril Geismar, Parth Patel, Madhumita Shrotri, Nicholas Patni, Isobel Braithwaite, Annalan M D Navaratnam, Robert W Aldridge, Andrew Hayward
medRxiv 2021.06.11.21258730; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.11.21258730

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3292)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (279)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13374)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5153)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3268)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
  • Hematology (431)
  • HIV/AIDS (1017)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14627)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (523)
  • Neurology (4925)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (724)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4212)
  • Public and Global Health (7504)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1705)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1013)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)