Abstract
Surveys are a crucial tool for understanding public opinion and behavior, and their accuracy depends on maintaining statistical representativeness of their target populations by minimizing biases from all sources. Increasing data size shrinks confidence intervals but magnifies the impact of survey bias – an instance of the Big Data Paradox 1. Here we demonstrate this paradox in estimates of first-dose COVID-19 vaccine uptake in US adults: Delphi-Facebook 2,3 (about 250,000 responses per week) and Census Household Pulse 4 (about 75,000 per week). By May 2021, Delphi-Facebook overestimated uptake by 17 percentage points and Census Household Pulse by 14, compared to a benchmark from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Moreover, their large data sizes led to minuscule margins of error on the incorrect estimates. In contrast, an Axios-Ipsos online panel 5 with about 1,000 responses following survey research best practices 6 provided reliable estimates and uncertainty. We decompose observed error using a recent analytic framework 1 to explain the inaccuracy in the three surveys. We then analyze the implications for vaccine hesitancy and willingness. We show how a survey of 250,000 respondents can produce an estimate of the population mean that is no more accurate than an estimate from a simple random sample of size 10. Our central message is that data quality matters far more than data quantity, and compensating the former with the latter is a mathematically provable losing proposition.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
VB is funded by the University of Oxford's Clarendon Fund and the EPSRC and MRC through the OxWaSP CDT programme (EP/L016710/1). SF acknowledges the support of the EPSRC (EP/V002910/1).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
According to HRA decision tools (http://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/), our study is considered Research, and according to the NHS REC review tool (http://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/ethics/), we do not need NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC) review, as we only used (1) publicly available, (2) anonymized, and (3) aggregated data outside of clinical settings.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Revised and reformatted for journal.
Data Availability
Raw data is deposited in the Harvard Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GKBUUK). Data was collected from publicly available repositories of survey data by downloading it directly or using APIs. Code to replicate the findings is available in the repository https://github.com/vcbradley/ ddc-vaccine-US. The main decomposition of the ddc is available on the package "ddi" from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).
https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/axios-ipsos-coronavirus-index
https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey/data.html
https://cmu-delphi.github.io/delphi-epidata/symptom-survey/contingency-tables.html
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-trends
