Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Robustness and bias of European excess death estimates in 2020 under varying model specifications

View ORCID ProfileJonas Schöley
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.04.21258353
Jonas Schöley
1Interdisciplinary Centre on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark; Odense, Denmark
2Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research; Rostock, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonas Schöley
  • For correspondence: schoeley@demogr.mpg.de
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Various procedures are in use to calculate excess deaths during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Using weekly death counts from 20 European countries, we evaluate the robustness of excess death estimates to the choice of model for expected deaths and perform a cross-validation analysis to assess the error and bias in each model’s predicted death counts. We find that the different models produce very similar patterns of weekly excess deaths but disagree substantially on the level of excess. While the exact country ranking along percent excess death in 2020 is sensitive to the choice of model the top and bottom ranks are robustly identified. On the country level, the 5-year average death rate model tends to produce the lowest excess death estimates, whereas high excess deaths are produced by the popular 5-year average death count and Euromomo-style Serfling models. Cross-validation revealed these estimates to be biased under a causal interpretation of “expected deaths had COVID-19 not happened.”

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

This study only uses publicly available population data

Funding Statement

ROCKWOOL Foundation's Excess Deaths grant

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data and code to replicate the results in this paper are available at https://github.com/jschoeley/rbx2020.

https://github.com/jschoeley/rbx2020

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 09, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Robustness and bias of European excess death estimates in 2020 under varying model specifications
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Robustness and bias of European excess death estimates in 2020 under varying model specifications
Jonas Schöley
medRxiv 2021.06.04.21258353; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.04.21258353
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Robustness and bias of European excess death estimates in 2020 under varying model specifications
Jonas Schöley
medRxiv 2021.06.04.21258353; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.04.21258353

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (227)
  • Allergy and Immunology (503)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1234)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (530)
  • Epidemiology (10015)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (499)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2449)
  • Geriatric Medicine (236)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1639)
  • Health Policy (752)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (636)
  • Hematology (248)
  • HIV/AIDS (532)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11862)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (252)
  • Medical Ethics (74)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2278)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (350)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (453)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (535)
  • Oncology (1245)
  • Ophthalmology (375)
  • Orthopedics (133)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (155)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (729)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (311)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2280)
  • Public and Global Health (4829)
  • Radiology and Imaging (834)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (491)
  • Respiratory Medicine (651)
  • Rheumatology (284)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (237)
  • Sports Medicine (226)
  • Surgery (267)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)