Maternal underweight and obesity are associated with placental pathologies in human pregnancy
=============================================================================================

* Hailey Scott
* David Grynspan
* Laura N Anderson
* Kristin L Connor

## Abstract

**Introduction** Maternal underweight and obesity are prevalent conditions, associated with chronic, low-grade inflammation, poor fetal development, and long-term adverse outcomes for the child. The placenta senses and adapts to the pregnancy environment in an effort to support optimal fetal development. However, the mechanisms driving these adaptations, and the resulting placental phenotypes, are poorly understood. We hypothesised that maternal underweight and obesity would be associated with increased prevalence of placental pathologies in term and preterm pregnancies.

**Methods** Data from 12,154 pregnancies were obtained from the Collaborative Perinatal Project, a prospective cohort study conducted from 1959 to 1974. Macro and microscopic placental pathologies were analysed across maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) to assess differences in the presence of pathologies among underweight, overweight, and obese BMI groups compared to normal weight reference BMI at term and preterm. Placental pathologies were also assessed across fetal sex.

**Results** Pregnancies complicated by obesity had placentae with increased fetal inflammation at preterm, and increased inflammation of maternal gestational tissues at term. In term pregnancies, increasing maternal BMI associated with increased maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM), odds of an appropriately mature placenta for gestational age, and placental weight, and decreased placental efficiency. Male placentae, independent of maternal BMI, had increased inflammation, MVM, and placental efficiency than female placentae, particularly at term.

**Discussion** Maternal underweight and obesity are not inert conditions for the placenta, and the histomorphological changes driven by suboptimal maternal BMI may serve as indicators of adversities experienced *in utero* and potential predictors of future health trajectories.

Keywords
*   Underweight
*   obesity
*   placental pathology
*   inflammation
*   Collaborative Perinatal Project

## Introduction

Maternal underweight and obesity are global health burdens; maternal underweight remains a persisting problem, and the prevalence of obesity in pregnancy continues to rise1-3. Both conditions have been associated with higher levels of inflammation in the mother, which favour increased inflammation in the placenta4, suboptimal nutrient availability to the fetus4, and adverse pregnancy and offspring outcomes5,6. Yet, the mechanisms that drive these outcomes remain poorly understood.

The placenta is a critical regulator of the fetal environment and can adapt to mitigate harmful exposures, or maladapt to permit their adverse effects7. For example, inflammation can reduce placental area8 and impair spiral artery remodelling9, which can affect nutrient and gas exchange8-11 with potential consequences for the developing offspring12-14. Additionally, there is some evidence that maternal underweight and obesity may be unfavourable for placental development. Maternal obesity has been associated with chronic villitis15,16, both delayed and accelerated placental villous maturation16, and increased atheromas and villous infarcts16,17, pathologies which have been linked to placental insufficiency18, fetal growth restriction, and neurodevelopmental impairment16. The effects of maternal undernutrition or low BMI on placental pathologies are less well documented19. Animal models of undernutrition have shown evidence of abnormal placental vasculature and decreased fetal blood space, labyrinth, and junctional zone area19, which may impair placental transfer20. The pro-inflammatory state induced by maternal underweight and obesity may also directly influence placental function, for example through altered expression of placental nutrient transporters21-23. Thus, to regulate the fetal environment, the placenta senses and integrates signals from the maternal environment, which may impact placental pathology. One mechanism through which the placenta may sense changes in maternal pathophysiology associated with suboptimal maternal BMI is mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), to regulate nutrient transport and subsequently, fetal growth24,25. Maternal obesity has been shown to activate placental mTOR, associated with increased fetal growth26, while conversely, intrauterine growth restriction, linked to maternal underweight27, has been associated with reduced placental mTOR signalling activity28. This suggests that the placenta integrates multiple signals, including those indicative of maternal supply and fetal demand, to regulate nutrient transfer and fetal growth29. Further, suboptimal maternal BMI is associated with altered metabolic status, and maternal obesity associates with dysregulated levels of metabolic hormones, including leptin and insulin, that are known to be upstream regulators of placental mTOR, and can influence placental nutrient transport26. The low-grade, pro-inflammatory state associated with maternal obesity may also alter placental outcomes, through increased placental levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines30-32, placental immune cells31, and activation of innate immune signalling pathways32-34, potentially mediating inflammatory signals between the mother, placenta, and fetus in pregnancies complicated by suboptimal maternal BMI.

However, given the multifactorial pathophysiology associated with suboptimal maternal BMI, including inflammatory, metabolic, and vascular factors35,36, reflected pathological phenotypes may vary. Even in the absence of overt adverse outcomes, such as large or small for gestational age infants or preterm birth37, changes to placental morphology and function (even subtle) may still have lasting effects on offspring health trajectories38,39. Therefore, it is important to understand even subtle placental phenotypes in these common conditions, as placental structural and functional adaptations may serve as a record of adversities experienced *in utero*, and could help reveal the mechanisms through which these adversities affect the developing offspring. However, the placental morphological and histopathologic changes induced by maternal underweight and obesity, in the absence of other major comorbidities or adverse perinatal events, are poorly characterized.

We hypothesised that, compared to women of normal weight, maternal underweight and obesity prepregnancy would be associated with increased prevalence of placental pathologies in term and preterm pregnancies, and that there would be differences in pathology prevalence based on placental sex. Using data from the Collaborative Perinatal Project (CPP), our primary objective was to determine whether placental pathologies were more prevalent in term and preterm pregnancies complicated by suboptimal maternal prepregnancy BMI. Our findings help to quantify placental pathologies in common pregnancy conditions, and uncover the mechanisms linking poor maternal metabolic health with suboptimal fetal growth and development.

## Methods

### Study design and population

Secondary data analysis was conducted using data from the CPP, a prospective cohort study designed to identify relationships between pregnancy and perinatal risk factors and child outcomes ([https://catalog.archives.gov/id/606622](https://catalog.archives.gov/id/606622)). The CPP was conducted from 1959 to 1974 at 12 hospitals across the United States, and collected pregnancy data through the prenatal period and delivery, and child outcomes for approximately 58,000 pregnancies40.

The primary exposure of interest was maternal prepregnancy BMI, specifically maternal underweight, overweight, and obesity, compared to normal weight as the reference category. BMI was classified according to the World Health Organization and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines, where maternal BMI is categorized as underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5–24.9), overweight (25–29.9), or obese (≥30). To evaluate the associations between maternal BMI and placental pathologies, the study sample was restricted to pregnancies with placental pathology data available, and maternal height and prepregnancy weight available to calculate maternal prepregnancy BMI. We included only singleton births from first pregnancies (parity and gravidity of zero), where fetal sex was documented as male or female. Gestational age below 24 weeks or above 43 weeks were excluded based on the limit of viability41, and due to morphological changes to the placenta such as those induced by cellular senescence42, and increased risk for fetal complications in post-term pregnancies43. The CPP calculated gestational age based on the last menstrual period to the nearest week. These selection criteria resulted in a sample of 12,154 pregnancies (Supplementary Figure 1).

### Placental pathologies

The primary outcomes were macroscopic and microscopic placental pathologies (Figure 1). Macroscopic data included placental weight, largest and smallest diameter, thickness, and placental shape. Infant birthweight to placental weight/largest diameter/smallest diameter/thickness ratios were calculated as potential predictors of placental efficiency38,44. The top and bottom 0.5% of raw infant and placental anthropometry data (birthweight, placental weight, and placental dimensions) were excluded to remove biologically implausible data. The umbilical cord was assessed for cord edema and number of vessels, given the increased incidence of a single artery cord with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)45, a covariate of interest for pregnancies with obesity. Thrombosed fetal vessels and cut surface infarcts were assessed, which may be associated with impaired placental perfusion46. For microscopic variables: decidual vessel fibrinoids and atheroma were included, features of malperfusion47. Neutrophilic infiltration of the umbilical vein, umbilical artery, cord substance, chorion and amnion membranes, and chorion and amnion of the (fetal side) placental surface were also obtained, which may be indicative of ascending maternal infection48. Cut surface calcification was included as an indicator for placental maturation49. Syncytium-nuclear clumping, or syncytial knots, and stromal fibrosis are signs of accelerated villous maturation and were thus included50. Prescence of Langhans’ layer, Hofbauer cells, and pathological edema were included as indicators of placental immaturity51,52. A variable provided for the apparent maturity of the placenta was also included as a marker for appropriate placental development for gestational age. For multivariable analyses, categorical placental pathology variables were collapsed into binary categories (Supplementary Table 1).

![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/F1)

Figure 1. Prevalence of placental pathologies in term (A) and preterm (B) pregnancies.
The presence or absence of categorical placental pathologies across maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) groups, where mothers were categorized as underweight (UW), normal weight (NW), overweight (OW) or having obesity (OB), in term (n=10,415; panel A) and preterm (n=1,739; panel B) pregnancies.

We derived additional summary scores for placental inflammation, maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM), and placental immaturity. A maternal inflammation summary score was derived from the following variables: opacity of membranes and neutrophil infiltration of the amnion and chorion membranes and of the placental surface. Where data were available for all constituent variables, the individual variable scores were summed to create a composite score ranging from zero to fourteen, where a higher score represents increased levels of inflammation. Similarly, a fetal inflammation summary score was derived from neutrophilic infiltration of the umbilical vein, artery, and cord substance to create a composite score from zero to nine. A summary score considering features of MVM was derived from: presence of infarcts and syncytium-nuclear clumping to create a score ranging from zero to two, where a higher score indicates increased MVM. A placental immaturity score was derived from the following variables: presence of Langhans’ layer, Hofbauer cells, absence of stromal fibrosis, and normal or less than normal syncytium-nuclear clumping, to create a score ranging from zero to four where a higher score indicates a more immature placental phenotype (Supplementary Table 2).

### Maternal demographics

Our primary exposure of interest, maternal prepregnancy BMI, was defined based on measured height and self-reported prepregnancy weight collected at study enrollment. In addition to prepregnancy BMI, maternal demographic data including age, race, education, marital status, income, socioeconomic index, housing density, smoking history, diabetes mellitus status, and gestational weight gain were obtained. The socioeconomic index is a composite numerical index derived from scores for education (of the head of household/chief earner), occupation (of the head of household/chief earner), and family income, ranging from 0.0-9.5, where 9.5 represents the highest socioeconomic status53. Smoking history was provided as the number of cigarettes smoked per day at the time of the interview, from zero cigarettes (including non-smokers) to 60 cigarettes per day. Additional smoking categories included 61 or more cigarettes per day, regular smoker but less than one cigarette per day, and irregular smoker but less than four cigarettes per month. Smoking history was presented as non-smokers (including women currently smoking zero cigarettes per day), light smokers (less than one pack of 20 cigarettes per day), and heavy smokers (one or more packs of 20 cigarettes per day). Diabetes mellitus was presented as presence or absence, where presence included diabetes mellitus reported before pregnancy, during pregnancy, both before and during, during and postpartum, or before, during, and postpartum. Based on current recommendations from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines (2009), maternal weight gain was categorized as inadequate, adequate, or excessive for singleton pregnancies based on prepregnancy BMI, where the recommended weight gain ranges are 28–40 pounds, 25–35 pounds, 15–25 pounds or 11–20 pounds54 for mothers who are underweight, normal weight, overweight, or have obesity, respectively.

### Statistical analyses

#### Univariate analyses

Univariate analysis was conducted to evaluate differences in the prevalence of placental pathologies across maternal prepregnancy BMI groups. Given that the presence of some placental pathologies are dependent on gestational age55, we conducted all analyses stratified for term and preterm placentae. Differences between maternal BMI groups and placental measures were determined by Kruskal–Wallis test with Steel–Dwass *post hoc* for continuous nonparametric data, and Likelihood Ratio Chi Square test for categorical data. Placental pathologies were also assessed across fetal sex. Data are presented as median (interquartile range) and Wilcoxon test effect size (r) (95% confidence interval; CI) for non-parametric continuous data, and frequency (percentage) and Cramer’s V effect size (95% CI) or odds ratio (95% CI) (for binary fetal sex analyses) for categorical variables. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Data were analysed using JMP statistical software (14.0), and Wilcoxon test effect size and Cramer’s V effect size were calculated in R (4.1.2).

#### Multivariable analyses

We performed multivariable logistic and linear regression to determine the relationships between maternal prepregnancy BMI and placental pathologies at term and preterm. Logistic regression models were used to determine the associations between maternal BMI (continuous) and binary placental pathologies. Categorical placental pathology variables were collapsed into binary categories to calculate odds ratios for the pathological phenotype. Any data coded as unknown, unable to determine, or missing were excluded from regression analyses. Data are presented as unadjusted (OR) or adjusted units odds ratio (aOR) (95% CI). Linear regression models were used to determine the associations between maternal BMI (continuous) and continuous placental pathology variables. Data are reported as adjusted beta coefficient (aβ) (95% CI). Covariates of interest were identified a priori and included fetal sex (male/female), maternal race (White, Black, and Other), maternal age (continuous), smoking history (non-smoker, light smoker, heavy smoker), maximum gestational weight gain (continuous), diabetes (yes/no), maternal education (continuous), and socioeconomic index (continuous). Two regression models were defined a priori: 1) An unadjusted model was first used to identify the associations between prepregnancy BMI alone (as a continuous variable) with placental pathologies and 2) an adjusted model adjusted for the covariates defined above.

## Results

### Maternal demographics differed across maternal BMI groups

Maximum gestational weight gain among preterm (Wilcoxon test effect size, r=-0.09 [-0.14 to -0.04]) and term (r=-0.05 [-0.07 to -0.03]) pregnancies was greatest in underweight and lowest in obese BMI groups (Supplementary Tables 3-4). However, according to IOM (2009) guidelines, weight gain in underweight pregnancies was still inadequate at preterm and term, while most pregnancies with obesity had either inadequate or excessive weight gain at preterm, and excessive weight gain at term (Supplementary Tables 3-4). Maternal age, race, education, marital status, income, socioeconomic index, and housing density also differed by BMI group (Supplementary Tables 3-4). There were no differences in median maternal prepregnancy BMI across study years (based on date of delivery, p=0.10). The median BMI from 1959 to 1966 ranged from 20.9 (in years 1960, 1962, 1963, 1966) to 21.3 (in 1959; Supplementary Figure 2). Socioeconomic index varied by study site (p<0.0001); across the 12 study sites, median socioeconomic index ranged from 3.0, relatively low on the socioeconomic index scale ranging from 0.0 to 9.5 (Virginia; Tennessee; Louisiana locations) to 8.3, a relatively high socioeconomic index score (Buffalo, New York location; Supplementary Table 5). There was no association between maternal BMI and socioeconomic index at preterm, but at term, socioeconomic index was highest among term normal weight pregnancies compared to all other BMI groups (p<0.0001, Supplementary Table 4).

### Maternal obesity associated with increased neutrophil infiltration of gestational tissues

Among preterm pregnancies, fetal inflammation, characterised by the composite fetal inflammation summary score, was greater in placentae from mothers with obesity compared to underweight and normal weight BMI groups (r=0.009 [-0.04 to 0.06], Table 1). There were no effects of maternal BMI group on neutrophil infiltration in the preterm membranes or placental surface. Neutrophil infiltration of the umbilical vein (aOR=1.06 [1.01–1.12]), umbilical cord substance (aOR=1.08 [1.02– 1.14]), and amnion membrane (OR=1.05 [1.01–1.10]), but not the umbilical artery, chorion membrane, or amnion and chorion of the placenta, were more likely with increasing maternal BMI (Table 2).

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T1)

Table 1. 
Associations between maternal prepregnancy BMI and microscopic placental pathologies in preterm pregnancies, N=1739.

View this table:
[Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T2)

Table 2. 
Multivariable analyses for associations between maternal prepregnancy BMI (continuous) and microscopic placental pathologies in preterm pregnancies, N=1739.

Among term pregnancies, pregnancies complicated by obesity had the greatest percentage of marked neutrophil infiltration of the umbilical vein and artery, amnion and chorion membranes, and amnion, but not chorion, of the placental surface (Table 3). The maternal inflammation summary score was greatest among pregnancies complicated by obesity, though there were no differences between BMI groups on post hoc analysis (r=0.008 [-0.01 to 0.03], Table 3). Further, neutrophilic infiltration of the umbilical vein (aOR=1.03 [1.01–1.05]), artery (aOR=1.04 [1.00–1.07]), and cord substance (aOR=1.04 [1.01–1.07]) increased with increasing BMI (Table 4). Neutrophil infiltration of the amnion membrane (aOR=1.06 [1.03–1.08]), chorion membrane (aOR=1.04 [1.02– 1.06]), amnion of the placental surface (aOR=1.04 [1.01–1.07]), and chorion of the placental surface (aOR=1.04 [1.02–1.06]) were also greater with increasing BMI (Table 4).

View this table:
[Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T3)

Table 3. 
Associations between maternal prepregnancy BMI and microscopic placental pathologies in term pregnancies, N=10,415.

View this table:
[Table 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T4)

Table 4. 
Multivariable analyses for associations between maternal prepregnancy BMI (continuous) and microscopic placental pathologies in term pregnancies, N=10,415.

### Higher maternal BMI associated with MVM among term pregnancies

At term, increasing maternal BMI was associated with greater odds of an appropriately mature placenta based on apparent maturity of the placenta (aOR=0.94 [0.92–0.97]) and increased MVM (aβ=0.007 [0.004–0.01], Table 4), and placentae from mothers with obesity had the greatest percentage of thrombosed fetal vessels compared to all other BMI groups (Cramer’s V=0.03 [0.004–0.05], Supplementary Table 6). Additionally, presence of infarcts alone was more likely as maternal BMI increased (aOR=1.03 [1.02– 1.05], Supplementary Table 7). There were no differences in apparent placental maturity or vasculature-related pathologies by BMI among preterm pregnancies (Table 1).

### Both maternal underweight and increased BMI influenced placental anthropometry

In preterm pregnancies where mothers were underweight, placental weight was reduced compared to placentae from mothers with overweight and obesity (r=0.04 [-0.004 to 0.09]), and smallest diameter was reduced compared to placentae from pregnancies complicated by obesity (r=0.06 [0.01–0.11], Supplementary Table 8), but there were no differences in placental anthropometry compared to normal weight BMI. Among term pregnancies where mothers were underweight, placental weight (r=0.08 [0.06–0.10]) and smallest diameter (r=0.05 [0.03–0.07]) were reduced compared to all other BMI groups, with most prominent differences between the underweight and obese groups (Supplementary Table 6). At term only, birthweight to placental weight ratio was higher in mothers who were underweight compared to overweight, but not different than normal weight (r=-0.03 [-0.05 to -0.006], Supplementary Table 6). Similarly, when considering BMI as a continuous variable, placental weight and smallest diameter increased with increasing maternal BMI among preterm and term pregnancies, and birthweight to placental weight ratio decreased with increasing maternal BMI at term (Supplementary Tables 7,9).

### Fetal sex influenced placental pathology

Among preterm pregnancies, female placentae had a greater fetal inflammation summary score than male placentae (r=-0.05 [-0.10 to -0.004], Table 5), but there were no sex differences in neutrophil infiltration of the membranes or placental surface. Male term placentae had greater fetal and maternal placental inflammation, including neutrophil infiltration of the umbilical vein, umbilical cord substance, amnion membrane, chorion membrane, amnion of the placenta, chorion of the placenta, and fetal and maternal inflammation summary scores (Table 5). Further, when considering only pregnancies with maternal obesity, at term, male placentae had greater neutrophil infiltration of the umbilical vein and chorion membrane than female placentae (Supplementary Figure 3).

View this table:
[Table 5.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T5)

Table 5. 
Associations between fetal sex and microscopic placental pathologies in preterm (N=1739) and term (N=10,415) pregnancies.

Female preterm placentae had increased syncytium-nuclear clumping (OR=0.53 [0.31– 0.91], Table 5), but there were no differences in presence of infarcts or MVM summary score between sexes preterm. Male term placentae had increased MVM (r=0.04 [0.02– 0.06], Table 5) and placental infarcts compared to female placentae (OR=1.22 [1.11– 1.33], Table 6). Infant birthweight to placental weight ratio was also increased in males compared to females at preterm (r=0.07 [0.03–0.12]) and term (r=0.07 [0.05–0.09], Table 6).

View this table:
[Table 6.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T6)

Table 6. 
Associations between fetal sex and macroscopic placental pathologies in preterm (N=1739) and term (N=10,415) pregnancies.

## Discussion

We evaluated the associations between maternal prepregnancy BMI and the prevalence of placental pathologies in preterm and term pregnancies, to better understand the placental mechanisms that may explain poor pregnancy and offspring outcomes in pregnancies complicated by suboptimal maternal BMI. Using data from 12,154 pregnancies from the Collaborative Perinatal Project, we found placental inflammation was increased in pregnancies complicated by maternal obesity, and notably, the inflammatory response was different based on gestational age. Maternal obesity also associated with increased MVM of the placenta, and increased maternal BMI associated with greater odds of having an appropriate mature placenta at term. Placental efficiency was highest in pregnancies where mothers were underweight and in male placentae, and pathologies also differed by fetal sex. Suboptimal maternal BMI thus alters normal gestational tissue development, with likely effects on function.

The inflammatory conditions established by maternal obesity may favour placental inflammation. In support of this, we found that higher maternal BMI associated with increased fetal (e.g. neutrophilic infiltration of the umbilical vein, artery, and cord substance) inflammation at preterm, and maternal (e.g. neutrophilic infiltration of the amnion and chorion membranes, amnion and chorion of the placenta, and opacity of membranes) gestational tissue inflammation at term. While few studies have characterised fetal- and maternal-specific placental inflammation in the context of both maternal BMI and gestational age, at term, maternal inflammation has been previously characterized in pregnancies with obesity, evidenced by increased pro-inflammatory cytokines in the placenta30, and increased maternal, but not fetal, inflammatory lesions17,56. Other studies have found no differences in placental inflammation by maternal BMI in term pregnancies, however, these cohorts had a small number of cases57,58. Less is known about the relationships between maternal obesity and specific placental inflammation at preterm, however, maternal obesity has been associated with greater risk of chorioamnionitis leading to preterm birth59, and a combination of maternal (defined as inflammation in the chorion, amnion, and decidua) and fetal (inflammation of the umbilical cord and chorionic plate fetal vessels) gestational tissue inflammation has been linked to higher risk of extreme preterm birth than maternal gestational tissue inflammation alone60. In the context of ascending infection, fetal placental inflammation of the umbilical cord has been associated with greater neonatal morbidity and mortality, particularly among preterm pregnancies, than maternal placental inflammation61-63. Our study, unlike many others, considers both suboptimal maternal BMI and gestational age, and suggests that increased maternal BMI associates with fetal placental inflammation at preterm, which has been linked to adverse pregnancy and offspring outcomes64,65, and maternal focused placental inflammation at term. Fetal inflammation of the placenta at preterm could thus be an important risk factor for adverse offspring outcomes, and maternal placental inflammation, though less frequently associated with clinical correlates64, nonetheless suggests that suboptimal maternal BMI alters gestational tissue histomorphology.

Interestingly, preterm female placentae had increased fetal inflammation, while term male placentae had increased fetal and maternal inflammation. Few studies have observed gestational age-specific sex differences in placental inflammation, and studies that have shown increased female gestational tissue inflammation often only consider term placentae. For example, female placentae have been shown to have increased chronic villitis in pregnancies complicated by maternal obesity, however those observations were restricted to pregnancies at or near term15, as well as increased expression of genes related to immune regulation in normal, term pregnancies66. Sex-specific differences have also been observed in pregnancies exacerbated by other inflammatory conditions, where female placentae have increased mRNA expression levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-5 in pregnancies where mothers had asthma, compared to levels in male placentae67. Further, peripheral blood mononuclear cells treated with lipopolysaccharide from pregnant women carrying female fetuses had greater stimulated production of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β compared to women carrying male feutses, suggesting a greater response to immune challenge68. These findings may suggest that male and female fetuses implement different survival strategies in response to the same adverse environmental stimuli, where females may mount stronger responses, while males make minimal adaptations and continue to prioritize growth69,70. This may explain our finding of increased female fetal gestational tissue inflammation. Further, smaller body size71,72 may allow female fetuses to gestate longer in the context of intrauterine inflammation, while continuing to mount an immune response to adverse environmental conditions, while larger male fetuses71,72 may trigger uterine mechanical stretch, and in conjunction with inflammatory signals73,74, initiate earlier parturition.

In contrast, male placentae have been observed to have higher rates of chronic inflammatory lesions in extreme preterm pregnancies75, chronic deciduitis among extreme preterm pregnancies with pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction76, and enrichment in inflammatory pathways77. Our findings suggest that male placentae are more susceptible to inflammation in term pregnancies, which could increase risk for impaired growth or neurodevelopment and long term health outcomes78,79, while increased fetal inflammation among preterm female placentae warrants further investigation. Given the associations of maternal obesity and male sex with increased placental inflammation, term males born to mothers with obesity may be most susceptible to placental inflammation. To further investigate this, we conducted an exploratory analysis to assess whether fetal sex associated with placental inflammation among pregnancies with obesity alone. Increased odds of inflammation in male placentae at term only, though not to the same extent as BMI inclusive differences, suggests that both maternal obesity and male sex may be independent risk factors for placental inflammation at term. Further studies are needed to corroborate this finding.

We found MVM also associated with increased maternal BMI among term pregnancies, consistent with existing data80. Previous studies have documented increased maternal vascular lesions58 and decidual vasculopathy, but no other lesions associated with MVM, in placentae from term pregnancies complicated by obesity compared to normal weight, although this was attributed to maternal hypertensive disease15. MVM lesions impair intervillous blood flow, altering oxygen and nutrient delivery to the fetus47, and are associated with adverse offspring outcomes, including preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, and small for gestational age infants47. Our findings suggest that the adverse environment established by maternal obesity may impair the development and function of placental vasculature, and thus fetal development. Despite known associations of MVM and preterm birth47,81, increased BMI associated with MVM only among term pregnancies in our cohort15,47,58, suggesting the importance of vascular pathologies across gestation in pregnancies complicated by maternal obesity. Further, male placentae had increased MVM lesions compared to females at term in our study, consistent with other findings of increased decidual vasculopathy in males15. Thus, placental vasculature pathology may not be so severe as to result in early pregnancy or other adverse perinatal events, but may still have long term implications for the infant.

In contrast to previous studies, we found increased maternal BMI associated with greater odds of having an appropriately mature placenta at term. Placentae from women with obesity have been shown to have immaturity of the villous tree compared to women of normal weight57, suggesting structural and functional maladaptation of the vasculature or decreased efficiency in maternal-fetal exchange57. We did, however observe other placental vascular pathologies, evidenced by increased MVM with higher maternal BMI. Placental maturity was classified by CPP pathologists as placental appearance of <20, 20–27, 28–36, or ≥37 weeks’ gestation, based on presence of fibrin under the chorionic plate, presence of cysts on the cut surfaces, lack of Langhans layer, relative uniformity of villous size, crowded fetal capillaries within villi, and increased frequency of syncytial knots. In addition to the lower number of cases of obesity in our cohort relative to the current rates, changes to criteria used to diagnose distal villous immaturity, which was only introduced after the time of the CPP82, may in part account for these differences in apparent placental maturity. Overall, a consistent, universal classification of placental maturation disorders would be beneficial in reducing variation in assessment of placental maturity across studies83.

Our findings of decreased placental size and increased infant birthweight to placental weight ratio with lower maternal BMI are consistent with reduced nutrient availability in underweight pregnancies5,20,84, and suggest that the placenta may adapt to increase nutrient delivery to the fetus, whereas placentae from higher BMI pregnancies may adapt by regulating nutrient transfer to the fetus in the face of sufficient or overabundance of nutrients85,86. Conversely, among term pregnancies, decreased birthweight to placental smallest diameter ratio with lower maternal BMI could suggest lower placental efficiency in pregnancies with underweight. However, placental diameter is reflective of the lateral growth of the placenta and area of the uterine lining that it encompasses, and may be influenced by inter-individual variations such as differences in placental shape, whereas placental weight captures multiple dimensions of placental growth87. Further, males had higher birthweight to placental size ratios in both preterm and term pregnancies, consistent with previous studies88, suggesting greater placental efficiency than females. Male fetuses tend to grow more rapidly than females and invest greater resources in growth than placental development and reserve capacity66,69-71, and as a result, may be more susceptible to placental insults as well as adverse later health outcomes71. Sex-based differences in fetoplacental growth and development may be attributed to a number of contributing biological factors, including X chromosome inactivation69,89, sex-specific response to glucocorticoids69,90, and levels of sex hormones69. Taken together, our results may suggest that males born to mothers who are underweight have the greatest placental efficiency, particularly at term.

Strengths of our study include the large population-based cohort, where previous studies have been limited to animal models of maternal malnutrition or inflammation to assess placental histopathology, or have lacked population size and comprehensive data. Importantly, the large sample size, collection of socioeconomic and demographic factors, deep phenotyping, and prospective nature of the dataset enables a thorough investigation of the relationships between maternal BMI and placental pathologies in a diverse population. To leverage the extensive data collected, future studies could further explore the role of demographic factors on placental pathology, such as socioeconomic status, in addition to suboptimal maternal BMI, given the independent risks associated with both low socioeconomic status91 and with maternal underweight and obesity15-17,19 on outcomes such as preterm birth and placental pathology, respectively. Due to the cohort’s historical nature, a limitation of our study is that the prevalence of obesity was lower than current rates; only 2.63% of our cohort were classified as having obesity prepregnancy, compared to 29% of American women currently92. Rates of smoking were also increased during the time of the study compared to rates today (42-45% during the time of CPP data collection93 compared to 16% in 201994), and no data were collected on maternal alcohol consumption95. Additionally, no data were provided for GDM specifically, which is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and is comorbid with obesity96,97, however, rates of GDM were much lower during the time of the study than current rates (0.3% in 197998 compared to 7.6% from 2007-201499), so any confounding is likely to be minimal. Placental pathology was not re-assessed, however, definitions of pathologies were largely consistent between the CPP and current Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement criteria18, particularly for our variables of interest. Given the population-based design, our findings may still be applicable to a broad and diverse population today, due to the large sample size and thorough collection of demographic and placental pathology data.

Given our findings of suboptimal maternal BMI, particularly high BMI, and risk of placental pathology, strategies to optimize maternal weight during pregnancy that align with improving patient-centred health outcomes and addressing root causes of obesity100 should be investigated for their effects on placental development and function, including other pregnancy outcomes. To date, there is limited evidence that dietary and lifestyle interventions are effective in improving pregnancy outcomes for women who have high BMI, but may still have implications for weight management. For example, a diet and physical activity intervention improved maternal lipid metabolic profiles across pregnancy in women with obesity, but did not improve the primary study outcomes of interest, prevalence of maternal diabetes mellitus and large for gestational age infants at birth101. However, in addition to improved diet and physical activity, the trial did show beneficial changes in maternal gestational weight gain101, and similar improvements in gestational weight gain have been seen in other diet and physical activity studies among women who were overweight prepregnancy102. Nonetheless, it is possible that modest changes in maternal diet and activity may result in subtle, but important, improvements in placental development and function, measures not often considered in maternal lifestyle intervention studies. For example, maternal exercise in a high fat diet mouse model of maternal obesity has shown improvements in maternal weight gain, serum glucose and lipid levels, and insulin sensitivity, and protective effects on placental vascular factors, in addition to prevented fetal overgrowth103. This study contributes to better understanding the role of the placenta in pregnancies complicated by suboptimal maternal BMI, to ultimately help inform clinical and policy guidelines.

Our data demonstrate that compared to normal weight, maternal underweight and obesity prepregnancy, even in the absence of other significant pregnancy complications, are not inert conditions for the developing placenta16,37, which may have consequences not only for immediate pregnancy and fetal outcomes but postnatal growth and health trajectories38,39,44,104. Characterising placental (mal)adaptations to common maternal conditions using clinically-relevant indicators can help to understand the mechanisms through which these conditions affect the developing offspring, and aid clinical decision making to better support high-risk pregnancies and inform interventions to optimise pregnancy, placental, and infant health.

## Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the United States National Archives at [https://www.archives.gov/research/electronic-records/nih.html](https://www.archives.gov/research/electronic-records/nih.html), National Archives Identifier: 606622 (Record Group 443: Records of the National Institutes of Health [NIH]). Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

[https://www.archives.gov/research/electronic-records/nih.html](https://www.archives.gov/research/electronic-records/nih.html) 

## Funding and Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare. This research is funded by the Faculty of Science, Carleton University. HS was supported by a Mitacs Research Training Award. KLC is supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Molly Towell Perinatal Research Foundation (New Investigator), and Carleton University Office of Research.

### Acknowledgments

The authors thank the U.S. National Archives for the publicly available Collaborative Perinatal Project data, and Marina White for her assistance with obtaining the dataset.

## Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology: HS, KLC, DG, LNA; formal analysis: HS; writing—original draft preparation: HS, KLC; writing—review and editing: HS, KLC, DG, LNA; visualization: HS, KLC.

## Supplementary tables

View this table:
[Supplementary Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T7)

Supplementary Table 1. 
Binary categories for placental pathology variables for multivariable analysis.

View this table:
[Supplementary Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T8)

Supplementary Table 2. 
Derived summary scores variable coding.

View this table:
[Supplementary Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T9)

Supplementary Table 3. 
Maternal characteristics by prepregnancy BMI in preterm pregnancies, N=1739.

View this table:
[Supplementary Table 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T10)

Supplementary Table 4. 
Maternal characteristics by prepregnancy BMI in term pregnancies, N=10,415.

View this table:
[Supplementary Table 5.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T11)

Supplementary Table 5. 
Socioeconomic index (SES) stratified by study site.

View this table:
[Supplementary Table 6.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T12)

Supplementary Table 6. 
Associations between maternal prepregnancy BMI and macroscopic placental pathologies in term pregnancies, N=10,415.

View this table:
[Supplementary Table 7.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T13)

Supplementary Table 7. 
Multivariable analyses for associations between maternal prepregnancy BMI (continuous) and macroscopic placental pathologies in term pregnancies, N=10,415.

View this table:
[Supplementary Table 8.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T14)

Supplementary Table 8. 
Associations between maternal prepregnancy BMI and macroscopic placental pathologies in preterm pregnancies, N=1739.

View this table:
[Supplementary Table 9.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/T15)

Supplementary Table 9. 
Multivariable analyses for associations between maternal prepregnancy BMI (continuous) and macroscopic placental pathologies in preterm pregnancies, N=1739.

## Supplementary figures

![Supplementary Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/F2.medium.gif)

[Supplementary Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/F2)

Supplementary Figure 1. 
Participant flow selection and placental pathologies of interest.

![Supplementary Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/F3.medium.gif)

[Supplementary Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/F3)

Supplementary Figure 2. 
Maternal prepregnancy BMI (continuous) across study years (based on date of delivery). There were no differences in maternal BMI (continuous) stratified by year of delivery. Data are (A) median (IQR; Kruskal-Wallis/Wilcoxon test), and (B) scatter plot with line of fit.

![Supplementary Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/F4.medium.gif)

[Supplementary Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/19/2021.06.01.21258127/F4)

Supplementary Figure 3. 
Placental neutrophil infiltration in pregnancies with maternal obesity by fetal sex, n=318. Prescence or absence of neutrophil infiltration for female and male placentae among pregnancies with maternal obesity by preterm (male: n=22, female: n=16) and term (male: n=133, female: n=147) birth. Data are n (%) (Likelihood Ratio Chi Square test) and odds ratio (95% CI) for presence of pathology in male placentae.

*   Received June 1, 2021.
*   Revision received April 19, 2022.
*   Accepted April 19, 2022.


*   © 2022, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission.

## References

1.  1.Di Angelantonio E, Bhupathiraju SN, Wormser D, et al. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. The Lancet. 2016;388(10046):776–786. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30175-1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30175-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27423262&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

2.  2.Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. Aug 3 2013;382(9890):427–451. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60937-x
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23746772&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000322638500036&link_type=ISI) 

3.  3.Gotay CC, Katzmarzyk PT, Janssen I, Dawson MY, Aminoltejari K, Bartley NL. Updating the Canadian obesity maps: an epidemic in progress. Can J Public Health. Nov 8 2012;104(1):e64–8. doi:10.1007/bf03405657
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/bf03405657&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23618109&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

4.  4.Gaccioli F, Lager S, Powell TL, Jansson T. Placental transport in response to altered maternal nutrition. J Dev Orig Health Dis. Apr 2013;4(2):101–15. doi:10.1017/s2040174412000529
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S2040174412000529&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25054676&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

5.  5.Yu Z, Han S, Zhu J, Sun X, Ji C, Guo X. Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index in Relation to Infant Birth Weight and Offspring Overweight/Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(4):e61627. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061627
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0061627&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23613888&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

6.  6.Basatemur E, Gardiner J, Williams C, Melhuish E, Barnes J, Sutcliffe A. Maternal prepregnancy BMI and child cognition: a longitudinal cohort study. Pediatrics. Jan 2013;131(1):56–63. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-0788
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTA6InBlZGlhdHJpY3MiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMTMxLzEvNTYiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wNC8xOS8yMDIxLjA2LjAxLjIxMjU4MTI3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

7.  7.Cox B, Tsamou M, Vrijens K, et al. A Co-expression Analysis of the Placental Transcriptome in Association With Maternal Pre-pregnancy BMI and Newborn Birth Weight. Front Genet. 2019;10:354. doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00354
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fgene.2019.00354&link_type=DOI) 

8.  8.Cotechini T, Hopman WJ, Graham CH. Inflammation-induced fetal growth restriction in rats is associated with altered placental morphometrics. Placenta. 2014/08/01/ 2014;35(8):575–581. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2014.05.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2014.05.002)
    
    

9.  9.Cotechini T, Graham CH. Aberrant maternal inflammation as a cause of pregnancy complications: A potential therapeutic target? Placenta. 2015/08/01/ 2015;36(8):960–966. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2015.05.016](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2015.05.016)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.placenta.2015.05.016&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26094029&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

10. 10.Renaud SJ, Cotechini T, Quirt JS, Macdonald-Goodfellow SK, Othman M, Graham CH. Spontaneous Pregnancy Loss Mediated by Abnormal Maternal Inflammation in Rats Is Linked to Deficient Uteroplacental Perfusion. The Journal of Immunology. 2011;186(3):1799. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1002679
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiamltbXVub2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTA6IjE4Ni8zLzE3OTkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wNC8xOS8yMDIxLjA2LjAxLjIxMjU4MTI3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

11. 11.Falcón BJ, Cotechini T, Macdonald-Goodfellow SK, Othman M, Graham CH. Abnormal inflammation leads to maternal coagulopathies associated with placental haemostatic alterations in a rat model of foetal loss. Thromb Haemost. Mar 2012;107(3):438–47. doi:10.1160/th11-09-0626
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1160/TH11-09-0626&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22234563&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

12. 12.Altmäe S, Segura MT, Esteban FJ, et al. Maternal Pre-Pregnancy Obesity Is Associated with Altered Placental Transcriptome. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169223. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169223
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0169223&link_type=DOI) 

13. 13.Connor KL, Kibschull M, Matysiak-Zablocki E, et al. Maternal malnutrition impacts placental morphology and transporter expression: an origin for poor offspring growth. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2020/04/01/ 2020;78:108329. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2019.108329](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2019.108329)
    
    

14. 14.Brett KE, Ferraro ZM, Yockell-Lelievre J, Gruslin A, Adamo KB. Maternal-fetal nutrient transport in pregnancy pathologies: the role of the placenta. International journal of molecular sciences. 2014;15(9):16153–16185. doi:10.3390/ijms150916153
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijms150916153&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25222554&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

15. 15.Leon-Garcia SM, Roeder HA, Nelson KK, et al. Maternal obesity and sex-specific differences in placental pathology. Placenta. 2016/02/01/ 2016;38:33–40. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2015.12.006](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2015.12.006)
    
    

16. 16.Brouwers L, Franx A, Vogelvang TE, Houben ML, van Rijn BB, Nikkels PG. Association of Maternal Prepregnancy Body Mass Index With Placental Histopathological Characteristics in Uncomplicated Term Pregnancies. Pediatr Dev Pathol. Jan-Feb 2019;22(1):45–52. doi:10.1177/1093526618785838
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/1093526618785838&link_type=DOI) 

17. 17.Bar J, Schreiber L, Saruhanov E, Ben-Haroush A, Golan A, Kovo M. Placental histopathological findings in obese and nonobese women with complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. Dec 2012;286(6):1343–7. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2450-z
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00404-012-2450-z&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22797660&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

18. 18.Khong TY, Mooney EE, Ariel I, et al. Sampling and Definitions of Placental Lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2016;140(7):698–713. doi:10.5858/arpa.2015-0225-CC
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.5858/arpa.2015-0225-CC&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27223167&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

19. 19.Schulz LC, Schlitt JM, Caesar G, Pennington KA. Leptin and the Placental Response to Maternal Food Restriction During Early Pregnancy in Mice1. Biology of Reproduction. 2012;87(5)doi:10.1095/biolreprod.112.103218
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1095/biolreprod.112.103218&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22993381&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

20. 20.Belkacemi L, Nelson DM, Desai M, Ross MG. Maternal Undernutrition Influences Placental-Fetal Development1. Biology of Reproduction. 2010;83(3):325–331. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.110.084517
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1095/biolreprod.110.084517&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20445129&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000281153800003&link_type=ISI) 

21. 21.Dimasuay KG, Boeuf P, Powell TL, Jansson T. Placental Responses to Changes in the Maternal Environment Determine Fetal Growth. 10.3389/fphys.2016.00012. Frontiers in Physiology. 2016;7:12.
    
    

22. 22.Myatt L, Maloyan A. Obesity and Placental Function. Semin Reprod Med. // 27.01.2016 2016;34(01):042–049. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1570027
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1055/s-0035-1570027&link_type=DOI) 

23. 23.Díaz P, Powell TL, Jansson T. The role of placental nutrient sensing in maternal-fetal resource allocation. Biology of reproduction. 2014;91(4):82–82. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.114.121798
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1095/biolreprod.114.121798&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25122064&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

24. 24.Akhaphong B, Baumann DC, Beetch M, et al. Placental mTOR complex 1 regulates fetal programming of obesity and insulin resistance in mice. JCI Insight. 07/08/ 2021;6(13)doi:10.1172/jci.insight.149271
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1172/jci.insight.149271&link_type=DOI) 

25. 25.Howell KR, Powell TL. Effects of maternal obesity on placental function and fetal development. Reproduction. 01 Mar. 2017 2017;153(3):R97–R108. doi:10.1530/REP-16-0495
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1530/REP-16-0495&link_type=DOI) 

26. 26.Jansson N, Rosario FJ, Gaccioli F, et al. Activation of placental mTOR signaling and amino acid transporters in obese women giving birth to large babies. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2013;98(1):105–113. doi:10.1210/jc.2012-2667
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1210/jc.2012-2667&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23150676&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000316210300042&link_type=ISI) 

27. 27.Han Z, Mulla S, Beyene J, Liao G, McDonald SD. Maternal underweight and the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol. Feb 2011;40(1):65–101. doi:10.1093/ije/dyq195
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ije/dyq195&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21097954&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000288720900012&link_type=ISI) 

28. 28.Roos S, Jansson N, Palmberg I, Säljö K, Powell TL, Jansson T. Mammalian target of rapamycin in the human placenta regulates leucine transport and is down-regulated in restricted fetal growth. J Physiol. Jul 1 2007;582(Pt 1):449–59. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.129676
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1113/jphysiol.2007.129676&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17463046&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000247561900039&link_type=ISI) 

29. 29.Lager S, Powell TL. Regulation of Nutrient Transport across the Placenta. Journal of Pregnancy. 2012/12/10 2012;2012:179827. doi:10.1155/2012/179827
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1155/2012/179827&link_type=DOI) 

30. 30.Roberts KA, Riley SC, Reynolds RM, et al. Placental structure and inflammation in pregnancies associated with obesity. Placenta. 2011/03/01/ 2011;32(3):247–254. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2010.12.023](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2010.12.023)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.placenta.2010.12.023&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21232790&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000288877200008&link_type=ISI) 

31. 31.Challier JC, Basu S, Bintein T, et al. Obesity in pregnancy stimulates macrophage accumulation and inflammation in the placenta. Placenta. 2008;29(3):274–281. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2007.12.010
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.placenta.2007.12.010&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18262644&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000254630700006&link_type=ISI) 

32. 32.Yang X, Li M, Haghiac M, Catalano PM, O’Tierney-Ginn P, Hauguel-de Mouzon S. Causal relationship between obesity-related traits and TLR4-driven responses at the maternal-fetal interface. Diabetologia. 2016;59(11):2459–2466. doi:10.1007/s00125-016-4073-6
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00125-016-4073-6&link_type=DOI) 

33. 33.Aye IL, Lager S, Ramirez VI, et al. Increasing maternal body mass index is associated with systemic inflammation in the mother and the activation of distinct placental inflammatory pathways. Biol Reprod. Jun 2014;90(6):129. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.113.116186
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1095/biolreprod.113.116186&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24759787&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

34. 34.Zhu MJ, D. M, Nathanielsz PW, Ford SP. Maternal obesity up-regulates inflammatory signaling pathways and enhances cytokine expression in the mid-gestation sheep placenta. Placenta. 2010/05/01/ 2010;31(5):387–391. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2010.02.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2010.02.002)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.placenta.2010.02.002&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20185176&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000278283200006&link_type=ISI) 

35. 35.Buddeberg BS, Sharma R, O’Driscoll JM, Kaelin Agten A, Khalil A, Thilaganathan B. Cardiac maladaptation in obese pregnant women at term. [https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20170](https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20170). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019/09/01 2019;54(3):344–349. doi: [https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20170](https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20170)
    
    

36. 36.Sarno L, Maruotti GM, Saccone G, Morlando M, Sirico A, Martinelli P. Maternal body mass index influences umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in physiologic pregnancies. [https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4499](https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4499). Prenatal Diagnosis. 2015/02/01 2015;35(2):125–128. doi: [https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4499](https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4499)
    
    

37. 37.Romero R, Kim YM, Pacora P, et al. The frequency and type of placental histologic lesions in term pregnancies with normal outcome. Journal of perinatal medicine. 2018;46(6):613–630. doi:10.1515/jpm-2018-0055
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1515/jpm-2018-0055&link_type=DOI) 

38. 38.Barker DJ, Thornburg KL, Osmond C, Kajantie E, Eriksson JG. The surface area of the placenta and hypertension in the offspring in later life. Int J Dev Biol. 2010;54(2-3):525–30. doi:10.1387/ijdb.082760db
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1387/ijdb.082760db&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19876839&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000275927200028&link_type=ISI) 

39. 39.Godfrey KM. The Role of the Placenta in Fetal Programming— A Review. Placenta. 2002/04/01/ 2002;23:S20–S27. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1053/plac.2002.0773](https://doi.org/10.1053/plac.2002.0773)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1053/plac.2002.0773&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11978056&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000175484400005&link_type=ISI) 

40. 40.Catalog NA. Collaborative Perinatal Project Files. 2020. [https://catalog.archives.gov/id/606622](https://catalog.archives.gov/id/606622)
    
    

41. 41.Seaton SE, King S, Manktelow BN, Draper ES, Field DJ. Babies born at the threshold of viability: changes in survival and workload over 20 years. Archives of disease in childhood Fetal and neonatal edition. 2013;98(1):F15–F20. doi:10.1136/fetalneonatal-2011-301572
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTM6ImZldGFsbmVvbmF0YWwiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiOTgvMS9GMTUiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wNC8xOS8yMDIxLjA2LjAxLjIxMjU4MTI3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

42. 42.Gal H, Lysenko M, Stroganov S, et al. Molecular pathways of senescence regulate placental structure and function. The EMBO journal. 2019;38(18):e100849–e100849. doi:10.15252/embj.2018100849
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15252/embj.2018100849&link_type=DOI) 

43. 43.Galal M, Symonds I, Murray H, Petraglia F, Smith R. Postterm pregnancy. Facts, views & vision in ObGyn. 2012;4(3):175–187.
    
    

44. 44.Baptiste-Roberts K, Salafia CM, Nicholson WK, Duggan A, Wang NY, Brancati FL. Gross placental measures and childhood growth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. Jan 2009;22(1):13–23. doi:10.1080/14767050802415728
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/14767050802415728&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19085212&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

45. 45.Xu Y, Ren L, Zhai S, et al. Association Between Isolated Single Umbilical Artery and Perinatal Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monit. Apr 30 2016;22:1451–9. doi:10.12659/msm.897324
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.12659/msm.897324&link_type=DOI) 

46. 46.Redline RW, Ravishankar S. Fetal vascular malperfusion, an update. APMIS. 2018/07/01 2018;126(7):561–569. doi:10.1111/apm.12849
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/apm.12849&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30129125&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

47. 47.Ernst LM. Maternal vascular malperfusion of the placental bed. APMIS. 2018/07/01 2018;126(7):551–560. doi:10.1111/apm.12833
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/apm.12833&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

48. 48.Nakayama M. Significance of pathological examination of the placenta, with a focus on intrauterine infection and fetal growth restriction. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2017/10/01 2017;43(10):1522–1535. doi:10.1111/jog.13430
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/jog.13430&link_type=DOI) 

49. 49.Wallingford MC, Benson C, Chavkin NW, Chin MT, Frasch MG. Placental Vascular Calcification and Cardiovascular Health: It Is Time to Determine How Much of Maternal and Offspring Health Is Written in Stone. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1044. doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01044
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fphys.2018.01044&link_type=DOI) 

50. 50.Loukeris K, Sela R, Baergen RN. Syncytial knots as a reflection of placental maturity: reference values for 20 to 40 weeks’ gestational age. Pediatr Dev Pathol. Jul-Aug 2010;13(4):305–9. doi:10.2350/09-08-0692-oa.1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2350/09-08-0692-OA.1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20017638&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

51. 51.Christians J, Grynspan D. Placental villous hypermaturation is associated with improved neonatal outcomes. Placenta. 01/15 2019;76 doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2019.01.012
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.placenta.2019.01.012&link_type=DOI) 

52. 52.Tang Z, Abrahams V, Mor G, Guller S. Placental Hofbauer cells and complications of pregnancy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 03/01 2011;1221:103–8. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05932.x
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05932.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21401637&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

53. 53.Myrianthopoulos NC, French KS. An application of the U.S. Bureau of the Census socioeconomic index to a large, diversified patient population. Soc Sci Med. Sep 1968;2(3):283–99. doi:10.1016/0037-7856(68)90004-8
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0037-7856(68)90004-8&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=5760819&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1968ZD69200004&link_type=ISI) 

54. 54.1.  Rasmussen KM, 
    2.  Yaktine AL
    
    Institute of Medicine and National Research Council Committee to Reexamine IOMPWG. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. In: Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, eds. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. National Academies Press (US) Copyright © 2009, National Academy of Sciences.; 2009.
    
    

55. 55.Stanek J. Comparison of placental pathology in preterm, late-preterm, near-term, and term births. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014;210(3):234.e1-234.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.015
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.015&link_type=DOI) 

56. 56.He M, Curran P, Raker C, Martin S, Larson L, Bourjeily G. Placental findings associated with maternal obesity at early pregnancy. Pathology - Research and Practice. 2016/04/01/ 2016;212(4):282–287. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2016.01.006](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2016.01.006)
    
    

57. 57.Loardi C, Falchetti M, Prefumo F, Facchetti F, Frusca T. Placental morphology in pregnancies associated with pregravid obesity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(16):2611–6. doi:10.3109/14767058.2015.1094792
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/14767058.2015.1094792&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26595316&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

58. 58.Kovo M, Zion-Saukhanov E, Schreiber L, et al. The Effect of Maternal Obesity on Pregnancy Outcome in Correlation With Placental Pathology. Reprod Sci. Dec 2015;22(12):1643–8. doi:10.1177/1933719115592712
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/1933719115592712&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26130679&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

59. 59.Hadley EE, Discacciati A, Costantine MM, et al. Maternal obesity is associated with chorioamnionitis and earlier indicated preterm delivery among expectantly managed women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2019/01/17 2019;32(2):271–278. doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1378329
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/14767058.2017.1378329&link_type=DOI) 

60. 60.Gupta M, Mestan KK, Martin CR, et al. Impact of clinical and histologic correlates of maternal and fetal inflammatory response on gestational age in preterm births. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2007/01/01 2007;20(1):39–46. doi:10.1080/14767050601156861
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/14767050601156861&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17437198&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000244865100007&link_type=ISI) 

61. 61.Katzman PJ, Metlay LA. Fetal Inflammatory Response is Often Present at Early Stages of Intra-amniotic Infection, and its Distribution along Cord is Variable. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology. 2010/07/01 2010;13(4):265–272. doi:10.2350/09-02-0604-OA.1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2350/09-02-0604-OA.1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19642812&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

62. 62.Kim CJ, Yoon BH, Romero R, et al. Umbilical arteritis and phlebitis mark different stages of the fetal inflammatory response. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001/08/01/ 2001;185(2):496–500. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.116689](https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.116689)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1067/mob.2001.116689&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11518916&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000170615200057&link_type=ISI) 

63. 63.Rogers BB, Alexander JM, Head J, McIntire D, Leveno KJ. Umbilical vein interleukin-6 levels correlate with the severity of placental inflammation and gestational age. Human Pathology. 2002/03/01/ 2002;33(3):335–340. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2002.32214](https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2002.32214)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1053/hupa.2002.32214&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11979375&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000175340300011&link_type=ISI) 

64. 64.Lau J, Magee F, Qiu Z, Houbé J, Von Dadelszen P, Lee SK. Chorioamnionitis with a fetal inflammatory response is associated with higher neonatal mortality, morbidity, and resource use than chorioamnionitis displaying a maternal inflammatory response only. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005/09/01/ 2005;193(3):708–713. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.017](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.017)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.017&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16150264&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000232013300017&link_type=ISI) 

65. 65.Tang Q, Zhang L, Li H, Shao Y. The fetal inflammation response syndrome and adverse neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2019:1–13. doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1702942
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/14767058.2019.1702942&link_type=DOI) 

66. 66.Sood R, Zehnder JL, Druzin ML, Brown PO. Gene expression patterns in human placenta. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103(14):5478. doi:10.1073/pnas.0508035103
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMToiMTAzLzE0LzU0NzgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wNC8xOS8yMDIxLjA2LjAxLjIxMjU4MTI3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

67. 67.Scott NM, Hodyl NA, Murphy VE, et al. Placental Cytokine Expression Covaries with Maternal Asthma Severity and Fetal Sex. The Journal of Immunology. 2009;182(3):1411. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.182.3.1411
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiamltbXVub2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTA6IjE4Mi8zLzE0MTEiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wNC8xOS8yMDIxLjA2LjAxLjIxMjU4MTI3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

68. 68.Mitchell AM, Palettas M, Christian LM. Fetal sex is associated with maternal stimulated cytokine production, but not serum cytokine levels, in human pregnancy. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2017;60:32–37. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2016.06.015
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.bbi.2016.06.015&link_type=DOI) 

69. 69.Clifton VL. Review: Sex and the human placenta: mediating differential strategies of fetal growth and survival. Placenta. Mar 2010;31 Suppl:S33–9. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2009.11.010
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.placenta.2009.11.010&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20004469&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000275707000006&link_type=ISI) 

70. 70.Meakin AS, Cuffe JSM, Darby JRT, Morrison JL, Clifton VL. Let’s Talk about Placental Sex, Baby: Understanding Mechanisms That Drive Female-and Male-Specific Fetal Growth and Developmental Outcomes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(12)doi:10.3390/ijms22126386
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijms22126386&link_type=DOI) 

71. 71.Eriksson JG, Kajantie E, Osmond C, Thornburg K, Barker DJP. Boys live dangerously in the womb. American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council. May-Jun 2010;22(3):330–335. doi:10.1002/ajhb.20995
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/ajhb.20995&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19844898&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

72. 72.Galjaard S, Ameye L, Lees CC, et al. Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population. Biology of Sex Differences. 2019/09/09 2019;10(1):48. doi:10.1186/s13293-019-0261-7
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s13293-019-0261-7&link_type=DOI) 

73. 73.Mendelson CR, Gao L, Montalbano AP. Multifactorial Regulation of Myometrial Contractility During Pregnancy and Parturition. Review. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2019;10
    
    

74. 74.Shynlova O, Tsui P, Dorogin A, Lye SJ. Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (CCL-2) Integrates Mechanical and Endocrine Signals That Mediate Term and Preterm Labor. The Journal of Immunology. 2008;181(2):1470. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.181.2.1470
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiamltbXVub2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTA6IjE4MS8yLzE0NzAiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wNC8xOS8yMDIxLjA2LjAxLjIxMjU4MTI3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

75. 75.Ghidini A, Salafia CM. Gender differences of placental dysfunction in severe prematurity. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2005;112(2):140–144. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00308.x
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00308.x&link_type=DOI) 

76. 76.Walker MG, Fitzgerald B, Keating S, Ray JG, Windrim R, Kingdom JCP. Sex-specific basis of severe placental dysfunction leading to extreme preterm delivery. Placenta. 2012/07/01/ 2012;33(7):568–571. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2012.03.011](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2012.03.011)
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22513321&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

77. 77.Cvitic S, Longtine MS, Hackl H, et al. The human placental sexome differs between trophoblast epithelium and villous vessel endothelium. PloS one. 2013;8(10):e79233–e79233. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079233
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0079233&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24205377&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

78. 78.Al-Haddad BJS, Oler E, Armistead B, et al. The fetal origins of mental illness. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019/12/01/ 2019;221(6):549–562. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.013](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.013)
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31207234&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

79. 79.Romero R, Espinoza J, Gonçalves LF, Kusanovic JP, Friel LA, Nien JK. Inflammation in preterm and term labour and delivery. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. Oct 2006;11(5):317–26. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2006.05.001
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.siny.2006.05.001&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16839830&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000240965600006&link_type=ISI) 

80. 80.Huang L, Liu J, Feng L, Chen Y, Zhang J, Wang W. Maternal prepregnancy obesity is associated with higher risk of placental pathological lesions. Placenta. 2014/08/01/ 2014;35(8):563–569. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2014.05.006](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2014.05.006)
    
    

81. 81.Scifres CM, Parks WT, Feghali M, Caritis SN, Catov JM. Placental maternal vascular malperfusion and adverse pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus. Placenta. 2017/01/01/ 2017;49:10–15. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2016.11.004](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2016.11.004)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.placenta.2016.11.004&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28012449&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

82. 82.Redline RW. Distal villous immaturity. Diagnostic Histopathology. 2012/05/01/ 2012;18(5):189–194. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpdhp.2012.02.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpdhp.2012.02.002)
    
    

83. 83.Turowski G, Vogel M. Re-view and view on maturation disorders in the placenta. [https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12858](https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12858). APMIS. 2018/07/01 2018;126(7):602–612. doi: [https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12858](https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12858)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/apm.12858&link_type=DOI) 

84. 84.Liu L, Ma Y, Wang N, Lin W, Liu Y, Wen D. Maternal body mass index and risk of neonatal adverse outcomes in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019/03/29 2019;19(1):105. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2249-z
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12884-019-2249-z&link_type=DOI) 

85. 85.Nogues P, Dos Santos E, Couturier-Tarrade A, et al. Maternal Obesity Influences Placental Nutrient Transport, Inflammatory Status, and Morphology in Human Term Placenta. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2020;doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa660
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1210/clinem/dgaa660&link_type=DOI) 

86. 86.Wallace JM, Horgan GW, Bhattacharya S. Placental weight and efficiency in relation to maternal body mass index and the risk of pregnancy complications in women delivering singleton babies. Placenta. 2012/08/01/ 2012;33(8):611–618. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2012.05.006](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2012.05.006)
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22695104&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

87. 87.Salafia CM, Maas E, Thorp JM, Eucker B, Pezzullo JC, Savitz DA. Measures of Placental Growth in Relation to Birth Weight and Gestational Age. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2005;162(10):991–998. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi305
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/aje/kwi305&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16192346&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000233218800007&link_type=ISI) 

88. 88.Wallace JM, Bhattacharya S, Horgan GW. Gestational age, gender and parity specific centile charts for placental weight for singleton deliveries in Aberdeen, UK. Placenta. 2013/03/01/ 2013;34(3):269–274. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2012.12.007](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2012.12.007)
    
    

89. 89.Reik W, Lewis A. Co-evolution of X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting in mammals. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2005/05/01 2005;6(5):403–410. doi:10.1038/nrg1602
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nrg1602&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15818385&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000228862900015&link_type=ISI) 

90. 90.Clifton VL, Murphy VE. Maternal asthma as a model for examining fetal sex-specific effects on maternal physiology and placental mechanisms that regulate human fetal growth. Placenta. 2004:S45–52.
    
    

91. 91.Parker JD, Schoendorf KC, Kiely JL. Associations between measures of socioeconomic status and low birth weight, small for gestational age, and premature delivery in the United States. Ann Epidemiol. Jul 1994;4(4):271–8. doi:10.1016/1047-2797(94)90082-5
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/1047-2797(94)90082-5&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7921316&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

92. 92.Driscoll A, Gregory E. Increases in Prepregnancy Obesity: United States, 2016–2019. [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db392.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db392.htm)
    
    

93. 93.(US) OoSaH. Chapter 2. Patterns of Tobacco Use Among Women and Girls. Text. 2001/03 2001;doi:[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44311/](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44311/)
    
    

94. 94.Cornelius M, Wang T, Jamal A, Loretan C, Neff L. Tobacco Product Use Among Adults — United States, 2019. [https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6946a4.htm?s\_cid=mm6946a4\_w](https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6946a4.htm?s_cid=mm6946a4_w)
    
    

95. 95.Klebanoff MA. The Collaborative Perinatal Project: a 50-year retrospective. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2009;23(1):2–8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00984.x
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00984.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19228308&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

96. 96.Al-Goblan AS, Al-Alfi MA, Khan MZ. Mechanism linking diabetes mellitus and obesity. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy. 2014;7:587–591. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S67400
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2147/DMSO.S67400&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25506234&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

97. 97.Huynh J, Dawson D, Roberts D, Bentley-Lewis R. A systematic review of placental pathology in maternal diabetes mellitus. Placenta. 2015;36(2):101–114. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2014.11.021
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.placenta.2014.11.021&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25524060&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom) 

98. 98.Lavery JA, Friedman AM, Keyes KM, Wright JD, Ananth CV. Gestational diabetes in the United States: temporal changes in prevalence rates between 1979 and 2010. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14236](https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14236). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2017/04/01 2017;124(5):804–813. doi: [https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14236](https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14236)
    
    

99. 99.Casagrande SS, Linder B, Cowie CC. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and subsequent Type 2 diabetes among U.S. women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Jul 2018;141:200–208. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.05.010
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.diabres.2018.05.010&link_type=DOI) 

100.100.Wharton S, Lau DCW, Vallis M, et al. Obesity in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2020;192(31):E875. doi:10.1503/cmaj.191707
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiRlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiY21haiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMToiMTkyLzMxL0U4NzUiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wNC8xOS8yMDIxLjA2LjAxLjIxMjU4MTI3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

101.101.Mills HL, Patel N, White SL, et al. The effect of a lifestyle intervention in obese pregnant women on gestational metabolic profiles: findings from the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT) randomised controlled trial. BMC Medicine. 2019/01/21 2019;17(1):15. doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1248-7
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12916-018-1248-7&link_type=DOI) 

102.102.Hajian S, Aslani A, Sarbakhsh P, Fathnezhad-Kazemi A. The effectiveness of healthy lifestyle interventions on weight gain in overweight pregnant women: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. [https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.577](https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.577). Nursing Open. 2020/11/01 2020;7(6):1876–1886. doi: [https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.577](https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.577)
    
    

103.103.Son JS, Liu X, Tian Q, et al. Exercise prevents the adverse effects of maternal obesity on placental vascularization and fetal growth. J Physiol. 2019;597(13):3333–3347. doi:10.1113/JP277698
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1113/JP277698&link_type=DOI) 

104.104.Marciniak A, Patro-Małysza J, Kimber-Trojnar Ż, Marciniak B, Oleszczuk J, Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B. Fetal programming of the metabolic syndrome. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017/04/01/ 2017;56(2):133–138. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2017.01.001](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2017.01.001)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/jcm8040429&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28420495&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F04%2F19%2F2021.06.01.21258127.atom)