Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population

Megan O’Brien, Zachary C. Rundell, Michelle D. Nemec, Laura M. Langan, Jeffrey A. Back, View ORCID ProfileJoaquin N. Lugo
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.01.21257858
Megan O’Brien
1Molecular Biosciences Center, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zachary C. Rundell
2Center for Reservoir and Aquatic Systems, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle D. Nemec
1Molecular Biosciences Center, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura M. Langan
3Department of Environmental Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey A. Back
2Center for Reservoir and Aquatic Systems, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joaquin N. Lugo
4Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joaquin N. Lugo
  • For correspondence: Joaquin_lugo@baylor.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Localized wastewater surveillance has allowed for public health officials to gain a broader understanding of SARS-CoV-2 viral prevalence in the community allowing public health officials time to prepare for impending outbreaks. Given variable levels of virus in the population through public health interventions, proper concentration and extraction of viral RNA is a key step in ensuring accurate detections. With many commercial RNA extraction kits and methodologies available, the performance of 4 different kits were evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in wastewater, specifically focusing on their applicability to lower population densities such as those at university campus dorms. Raw wastewater samples were collected at 4 sites on a college campus over a 24 hour period as a composite sample. Included in these sites was an isolation site that housed students that tested positive for Covid-19 via nasopharyngeal swabs. These samples were analyzed using the following kits: Qiagen All Prep PowerViral DNA/RNA kit, New England BioLabs Monarch RNA MiniPrep Kit, and Zymo Quick RNA-Viral Kit, and the Zymo Quick-RNA Fecal/Soil Microbe MicroPrep Kit. All four sites were processed according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Extractions were then quantified with RT-qPCR one-step reactions using an N2 primer and a linearized plasmid standard. While the Zymo Quick-RNA Fecal/Soil Microbe MicroPrep Kit (also known as the Zymo Environ Water RNA Kit) only recovered approximately 73% (+/- 38%) SARS-CoV-2 RNA compared to the Zymo Quick-RNA Viral kit, it was the most time efficient kit to yield comparable results. This extraction kit had a cumulative processing time of approximately five hours compared, while the other three kits had processing times between approximately 9 and 9.5 hours. Based on the current research, the most effective kits for smaller population densities are pellet based and include a homogenization, inhibitor removal, and RNA preservation step.

Highlights

  • - Samples from smaller population densities make concentrating RNA vital for detection

  • - Pelleting may provide for more timely concentration and extraction of SARS-CoV-2 RNA

  • - RNA shields and PCR inhibitor removal may increase detection of RNA during RT-qPCR

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received for this project

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Baylor University Institutional Review Board

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Clarified the number of samples used for the RNA extraction kits. Revised the introduction. Included more information on quality controls we used in the study. Expanded discussion. Revised the supplemental file with more quality control information.

Data Availability

Data is available upon request

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 18, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population
Megan O’Brien, Zachary C. Rundell, Michelle D. Nemec, Laura M. Langan, Jeffrey A. Back, Joaquin N. Lugo
medRxiv 2021.06.01.21257858; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.01.21257858
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population
Megan O’Brien, Zachary C. Rundell, Michelle D. Nemec, Laura M. Langan, Jeffrey A. Back, Joaquin N. Lugo
medRxiv 2021.06.01.21257858; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.01.21257858

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (215)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1093)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (195)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (499)
  • Epidemiology (9758)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (480)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2304)
  • Geriatric Medicine (222)
  • Health Economics (462)
  • Health Informatics (1554)
  • Health Policy (732)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (602)
  • Hematology (236)
  • HIV/AIDS (501)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11634)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (616)
  • Medical Education (236)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (257)
  • Neurology (2140)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (335)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (426)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (517)
  • Oncology (1172)
  • Ophthalmology (363)
  • Orthopedics (128)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (145)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (309)
  • Pediatrics (694)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (298)
  • Primary Care Research (265)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2173)
  • Public and Global Health (4648)
  • Radiology and Imaging (775)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (455)
  • Respiratory Medicine (623)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (225)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (250)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)