Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The impact of three progressively introduced interventions on second wave daily COVID-19 case numbers in Melbourne, Australia

View ORCID ProfileAllan Saul, Nick Scott, View ORCID ProfileTim Spelman, Brendan S. Crabb, View ORCID ProfileMargaret Hellard
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.29.21258055
Allan Saul
1The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Allan Saul
  • For correspondence: allan.saul{at}honorary.burnet.edu.au
Nick Scott
1The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
2Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim Spelman
1The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tim Spelman
Brendan S. Crabb
1The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
3Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
4Doherty Institute and School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret Hellard
1The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
2Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
4Doherty Institute and School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
5Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Margaret Hellard
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The city of Melbourne, Australia experienced two waves of the COVID-19 epidemic peaking, the first in March and a more substantial wave in July 2020. During the second wave, a series of control measure were progressively introduced that initially slowed the growth of the epidemic then resulted in decreasing cases until there was no detectable local transmission.

Methods To determine the relative efficacy of the progressively introduced intervention measures, we modelled the second wave as a series of exponential growth and decay curves. We used a linear regression of the log of daily cases vs time, using a four-segment linear spline model corresponding to implementation of the three successive major public health measures. The primary model used all reported cases between 14 June and 15 September then compared the projection of the model with observed cases predict future case trajectory up until the 31 October to assess the use of exponential models in projecting the future course and planning future interventions. The main outcome measures were the exponential daily growth constants, analysis of residuals and estimates of the 95% confidence intervals for the expected case distributions, comparison of predicted daily cases.

Results The exponential growth/decay constants in the primary analysis were: 0.122 (s.e. 0.004), 0.035 (s.e. 0.005), -0.037 (s.e. 0.011), and -0.069 (s.e. 0.003) for the initial growth rate, Stage 3, stage 3 + compulsory masks and Stage 4, respectively. Extrapolation of the regression model from the 14 September to the 31 October matched the decline in observed cases over this period.

Conclusions The four-segment exponential model provided an excellent fit of the observed reported case data and predicted the day-to-day range of expected cases. The extrapolated regression accurately predicted the decline leading to epidemic control in Melbourne.

Competing Interest Statement

NS and MH provide guidance to the Victorian Government COVID-19 response and receive funding from the Victorian Government for the Optimise Study and COVID-19 modelling work. NS received funding from Johnson & Johnson in Jun-Sep 2020 to provide incidence projections for potential vaccine trial sites. BC serves on the Australian National COVID-19 Health Research Advisory Committee that provides guidance to the Australian Federal Government COVID-19 response.

Clinical Trial

This was a retrospective analysis of the impact of public health measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in Melbourne. Therefore there was no clinical trial registered

Funding Statement

This study received no external funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

n/a

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data are available publicly from sources cited in the MS. Specifically, from the Victorian Government site

https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/ncov-covid-cases-by-lga-source-csv

  • Abbreviations

    DHHS
    Victorian Department of Health and Human Services
    k
    instantaneous growth constant
    Reff
    Effective Reproduction Ratio
    s.e.
    standard error
    C.I.
    confidence interval
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted June 02, 2021.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    The impact of three progressively introduced interventions on second wave daily COVID-19 case numbers in Melbourne, Australia
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    The impact of three progressively introduced interventions on second wave daily COVID-19 case numbers in Melbourne, Australia
    Allan Saul, Nick Scott, Tim Spelman, Brendan S. Crabb, Margaret Hellard
    medRxiv 2021.05.29.21258055; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.29.21258055
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    The impact of three progressively introduced interventions on second wave daily COVID-19 case numbers in Melbourne, Australia
    Allan Saul, Nick Scott, Tim Spelman, Brendan S. Crabb, Margaret Hellard
    medRxiv 2021.05.29.21258055; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.29.21258055

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (434)
    • Allergy and Immunology (760)
    • Anesthesia (222)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (3316)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (366)
    • Dermatology (282)
    • Emergency Medicine (480)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1175)
    • Epidemiology (13403)
    • Forensic Medicine (19)
    • Gastroenterology (900)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5182)
    • Geriatric Medicine (483)
    • Health Economics (786)
    • Health Informatics (3286)
    • Health Policy (1146)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1199)
    • Hematology (432)
    • HIV/AIDS (1024)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14657)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (917)
    • Medical Education (478)
    • Medical Ethics (128)
    • Nephrology (526)
    • Neurology (4957)
    • Nursing (263)
    • Nutrition (735)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (889)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (797)
    • Oncology (2531)
    • Ophthalmology (730)
    • Orthopedics (284)
    • Otolaryngology (348)
    • Pain Medicine (323)
    • Palliative Medicine (90)
    • Pathology (547)
    • Pediatrics (1308)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (552)
    • Primary Care Research (559)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4225)
    • Public and Global Health (7526)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1717)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1022)
    • Respiratory Medicine (982)
    • Rheumatology (480)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (500)
    • Sports Medicine (425)
    • Surgery (551)
    • Toxicology (73)
    • Transplantation (237)
    • Urology (206)