Corowa-kun: Impact of a COVID-19 vaccine information chatbot on vaccine hesitancy, Japan 2021 ============================================================================================= * Takaaki Kobayashi * Yuka Nishina * Hana Tomoi * Ko Harada * Kyuto Tanaka * Eiyu Matsumoto * Kenta Horimukai * Jun Ishihara * Shugo Sasaki * Kanako Inaba * Kyosuke Seguchi * Hiromizu Takahashi * Jorge L. Salinas * Yuji Yamada ## Abstract **Background** Few studies have assessed how mobile messenger apps affect COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. We created a COVID-19 vaccine information chatbot in a popular messenger app in Japan to answer commonly asked questions. **Methods** LINE is the most popular messenger app in Japan. Corowa-kun, a free chatbot, was created in LINE on February 6, 2021. Corowa-kun provides instant, automated answers to frequently asked COVID-19 vaccine questions. In addition, a cross-sectional survey assessing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was conducted via Corowa-kun during April 5–12, 2021. **Results** A total of 59,676 persons used Corowa-kun during February–April 2021. Of them, 10,192 users (17%) participated in the survey. Median age was 55 years (range 16–97), and most were female (74%). Intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine increased from 59% to 80% after using Corowa-kun (p < 0.01). Overall, 20% remained hesitant: 16% (1,675) were unsure, and 4% (364) did not intend to be vaccinated. Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy were: age 16 to 34 (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 3.0–4.6, compared to age ≥65), female sex (OR = 2.4, Cl: 2.1–2.8), and history of a previous vaccine side-effect (OR = 2.5, Cl: 2.2–2.9). Being a physician (OR = 0.2, Cl: 0.1–0.4) and having received a flu vaccine the prior season (OR = 0.4, Cl: 0.3–0.4) were protective. **Conclusions** Corowa-kun reduced vaccine hesitancy by providing COVID-19 vaccine information in a messenger app. Mobile messenger apps could be leveraged to increase COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Key words * COVID-19 * vaccine hesitancy * messenger app * social media * chatbot ## Text ### Background In 2020, a global coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic emerged, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. [1] According to the World Health Organization, there have been 134 million confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 2.9 million deaths, as of April 8, 2021. [2] Multiple COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective at preventing symptomatic disease. [3] Most developed countries have already vaccinated large proportions of their population. However, many individuals choose not to be vaccinated, often citing safety concerns. Studies in multiple settings have revealed high levels of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, ranging from 20–40% of the surveyed populations. [4-8] Vaccine hesitancy differs depending on sociodemographic factors, such as race and educational level, as well as attitudes and beliefs. [9-13] Understanding peoples’ concerns about COVID-19 vaccines is necessary to increase vaccine uptake among those who are hesitant. Japan has one of the highest vaccine hesitancy rates in the world. According to a previous study, less than 30% of people strongly agreed that vaccines were safe, important, or effective. [14] Moreover, Japan has a long history of public concerns about vaccine adverse events. The measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine was introduced into the national immunization program in 1989. However, because of reports of aseptic meningitis following the MMR vaccine, the Japanese government withdrew its recommendation for the MMR vaccine in 1993. [15] Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for girls ages 12–16 was first licensed in Japan in October 2009. Acceptance initially reached over 70%, but it fell to less than 1% after extensive media reports of possible adverse events. [16] Ultimately, the Japanese government suspended its recommendation for the vaccine in June 2013. [17] Social media are popular in Japan, allowing for circulation of user-generated content and social interaction. Using social media is an integral part of daily life for many people. Leveraging social media platforms to promote vaccines has been investigated. One study revealed that mothers presented with vaccine information on social media during their pregnancy were more likely to vaccinate their infants on time. [18] However, there is a paucity of studies assessing the effect of messenger apps on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. We created a chatbot in an already existing popular messenger app in Japan to provide people with COVID-19 vaccine information via text messages. We assessed the impact of chatbot text messages on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy by conducting a cross-sectional survey among chatbot users. ## Methods ### Corowa-kun: A chatbot with COVID-19 vaccine information in LINE LINE is a free messenger app available for use in electronic devices, such as smartphones, tablets, and personal computers. LINE users can exchange texts, images, video, and audio. LINE is the most popular messenger app in Japan; about 86 million people in Japan (roughly two-thirds of the population) use this messenger app. [19] We created a chatbot in LINE called Corowa-kun’s Consultation Room (Corowa-kun) (Figure 1 and supplemental figure 1) to answer COVID-19 vaccine frequently asked questions (FAQs) via text messages. Corowa-kun is free, and anyone using LINE can access it. To create Corowa-kun, we first searched for COVID-19 vaccine FAQs using Japanese government websites and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. [20] [21] Fifty questions that we thought were important were selected. We then composed our own corresponding answers to these fifty questions and used them as the initial content for Corowa-kun. Corowa-kun went live in LINE on February 6, 2021. Users have the option to enter free-text questions, and twenty additional FAQs with answers were added based on users’ free-text questions entered by April 5, 2021. The public was made aware of Corowa-kun using mass media (e.g. television, radio, newspapers). [22] ![Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/05/30/2021.05.26.21257854/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/30/2021.05.26.21257854/F1) Figure 1: Corowa-kun’s Consultation Room: a free messenger app chatbot, Japan 2021 Corowa-kun is the mascot of an online chatbot. This chatbot in LINE is used to answer COVID-19 vaccine frequently asked questions (FAQs) via text messages. As of May 10th, 70 FAQs are available. ### Corowa-kun users and frequently accessed FAQs We tracked the total number of users who accessed and used Corowa-kun from February 6 to April 12, 2021. We analyzed how frequently each FAQ was accessed from April 5 to 12, 2021. We did not examine frequency of FAQ access before April 5 because new FAQ messages were added prior to then, and the total number of FAQs changed from the initial content in February. ### Cross-sectional survey A cross-sectional survey was conducted using Corowa-kun during April 5–12, 2021. All persons who accessed Corowa-kun by April 12, 2021 were invited within Corowa-kun to participate in the survey. We did not use any incentives, and the survey was completely voluntary. The survey started with three screening questions: (1) “Are you 16 years old or older?”; (2) “Have you received a COVID-19 vaccine?”; and, (3) “Do you agree to participate?”. We included persons ages 16 years old and older who had not received a COVID-19 vaccine. Those who agreed to participate received a link to a Google form. Each LINE account could only answer the survey once. The survey was written in Japanese and consisted of 21 questions. To examine attitudes and beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccines, we included survey items used in similar studies and added our own questions (supplemental document 1). [4] We asked for age, sex, geographic location, educational attainment, employment status, occupation, marriage status, pregnancy status, household members <16 or >64 years old, household size, annual household income, presence of chronic diseases identified as risk factors for severe COVID-19 [21], smoking status, history of influenza vaccine in the previous season, self-rated overall health (scale from 1 to 9 with 9 being best), history of COVID-19, whether they would like to get COVID-19 vaccination once available (“I would like to get the vaccine” = Yes, “I am not sure” = Unsure, and “I do not want to get the vaccine” = No). Geographic locations were combined using the following categories: Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto (e.g., Tokyo), Chubu, Kansai (e.g., Osaka), Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu regions, and outside Japan. [23] We asked why they did or did not want to get COVID-19 vaccines using pre-defined answers with a free-text comment (supplemental document 1, respondents could choose multiple answers). Since we aimed to investigate the impact of Corowa-kun on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, we also asked whether there was any change in intent to be vaccinated before and after using Corowa-kun. ### Statistical analysis Participant characteristics were summarized using frequencies and percentages. For two group comparisons, the Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables and the U-Mann Whitney test was used for continuous variables. For three group comparisons, the Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. To identify risk factors for vaccine hesitancy, those responding “No” and “Unsure” were combined (vaccine hesitant) and compared to those responding “Yes”. We fit separate univariate logistic regression models for each exposure, limited to groups with 4 or more persons. We used SAS (version 9, Carey, NC) for statistical analysis. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Kanto Central Hospital. ## Results A total of 59,676 persons used Corowa-kun by April 12, 2021. During the cross-sectional survey period (April 5–12, 2021), a total of 14,240 FAQ text messages were used. The most commonly accessed message categories were: “I have (select comorbidity), can I get a COVID-19 vaccine?” (23%); followed by questions on adverse reactions (22%), and how the vaccine works (20%). Of 59,676 users, 2,472 had the LINE option to block surveys turned on or had inactive account, and 57,235 received the survey invitation. Of those who received it, 10,331 (18.1%) responded to the screening questions. Of those who responded, 139 users were excluded: 26 users were age <16, and 113 users had already received a COVID-19 vaccine. A total of 10,192 (17.1%) were included in the survey analysis. Median age was 55 years (range 16–97), and most were women (74%, table 1). The most common respondent regions were Kansai (42.4%) and Kanto (31.4%, supplemental figure 2). Almost all participants (98%) had a high school diploma or more advanced education. Healthcare workers consisted of 18% of participants: 171 (1.7%) were physicians and 1,723 (16.9%) were healthcare workers other than physicians. Sixty-six participants (0.7%) were pregnant. Participants who lived with someone age ≤16 comprised 19.2% of the study population, and those who lived with someone age ≥65 were 35.7%. The most common household size was three (25.5%). View this table: [Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/30/2021.05.26.21257854/T1) Table 1: Characteristics of the COVID-19 vaccine survey participants, Japan, 2021 (n=10,192) Figure 2 displays intent for being vaccinated before and after use of Corowa-kun. Participants who intended to be vaccinated increased after using Corowa-kun (p < 0.01). Overall, after use of Corowa-kun, 80.0% of participants intended to be vaccinated (an increase from 59% before use), 16.4% were not sure, and 3.6% did not intend to be vaccinated. ![Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/05/30/2021.05.26.21257854/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/30/2021.05.26.21257854/F2) Figure 2: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance increased and hesitancy decreased after using Corowa-kun, Japan, 2021 (n=10,192) *There was a statistically significant difference in responses between before and after using Corowa-kun (p < 0.01, Chi-square test) Participants who did not intend to be vaccinated or were not sure were combined (vaccine hesitant; n= 2,039) and compared to participants who intended to be vaccinated (n=8,153). Table 2 summarizes the factors associated with vaccine hesitancy: Age 16 to 34 (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 3.0–4.6, compared to age ≥65), female sex (OR = 2.4, Cl: 2.1–2.8), pregnancy (OR = 3.3, Cl: 2.0–5.3), and history of vaccine side-effects (OR = 2.5, Cl: 2.2–2.9). Being a physician (OR = 0.2, Cl: 0.1–0.4, compared to non-healthcare workers) and receiving a flu vaccine in the last influenza season (OR = 0.4, Cl: 0.3–0.4) were protective. View this table: [Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/30/2021.05.26.21257854/T2) Table 2: Univariable logistic regression models of factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, Japan, 2021 (n=10,192) Figure 3 summarizes the reported reasons for vaccine hesitancy or acceptance. The most common reasons for vaccine hesitancy were: “I am worried about vaccine side-effects and/or allergic reactions” (79.7%); followed by, “Many things are not understood about COVID-19 vaccines” (61.8%); and, “I do not think COVID-19 vaccines are safe” (22.2%). The most common reasons for vaccine acceptance were: “I do not want to get infected by COVID-19” (76.0%); followed by, “I do not want to be contagious to others” (74.2%); and, “If I catch COVID-19, I hope that I may only have mild symptoms” (72.5%). ![Figure 3:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/05/30/2021.05.26.21257854/F3.medium.gif) [Figure 3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/30/2021.05.26.21257854/F3) Figure 3: Reasons provided for COVID-19 hesitancy (A) and acceptance (B), COVID-19 vaccine survey, Japan, 2021 ## Discussion We created a chatbot to answer COVID-19 vaccine FAQs using the most popular messenger app in Japan. Within two months, nearly 60,000 people accessed Corowa-kun. One-fifth of survey participants were COVID-19 vaccine hesitant. The top risk factors for vaccine hesitancy were younger age, female sex, pregnancy or desire for pregnancy, and previous history of a vaccine side-effect. Protective factors included being a physician and a history of having received a flu vaccine the previous season. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance increased after using Corowa-kun. Corowa-kun, a messenger app chatbot, reached the public with COVID-19 vaccine information, helped assess COVID-19 vaccine attitudes, and reassured those with vaccine concerns. Besides serving as a socialization platform, social media can help reach those in need of health information. Vaccine content is already widely available across social media platforms. [24] However, there is conflicting data regarding the impact of social media on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Wilson et al. revealed that foreign disinformation campaigns are associated with a drop in mean vaccine coverage over time and an increase in negative discussions of vaccines. [24] On the other hand, Ahmed et al. found that people who utilize Twitter and Facebook as sources of health information were more likely to be vaccinated. [25] Furthermore, Ortiz et al. revealed that adolescents who fully engaged with social media health platforms improved their health knowledge, and many were likely to have discussions with others about what they learned. [26] We demonstrated that COVID-19 vaccine acceptance increased after using Corowa-kun. Direct communication between healthcare providers and patients is known to reduce vaccine concerns and improve overall uptake. [27] Public trust in doctors and nurses is relatively high in Japan; 26% reported a lot of trust, and 67% reported some trust. [28] Though there was no direct, real-time communication in Corowa-kun, the content was created by ten physicians, and FAQs were added in response to newly-asked questions by users in the free-text section, which might have contributed to the observed positive change. Healthcare providers may need to become more acquainted with social media and utilize these platforms to reduce vaccine hesitancy with more communication between providers and the public. [29] Our study found relatively higher rates of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (80%) compared to previously published studies in Japan. Yoda et al. conducted a cross-sectional study in September 2020 and gathered that 66% of participant were willing to be vaccinated against COVID-19 once a vaccine become available. [30] Another survey performed by Machida et al. in January 2021 noted that 62% of respondents were willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. [31] Recently, the U.S. CDC reported that the intent to receive a COVID-19 vaccine increased from 39% in September 2020 to 49% in December 2020. [32] Our survey was conducted in the middle of the COVID-19 fourth wave in Japan, and this may have contributed to the increasing trend of vaccine acceptance. A previous study postulated that women may be more hesitant about COVID-19 vaccines. [33] This could be related to the initial absence of vaccine safety and efficacy data for pregnant women. However, a recent U.S. study showed that among persons who received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, 63% were female. [34] This discrepancy could be because healthcare workers were offered the vaccine first in the United States, and women account for three-fourths of healthcare workers. Newer evidence suggesting that COVID-19 vaccines are safe in pregnancy may help decrease hesitancy. [20] Understanding more about vaccine hesitancy could inform public health efforts. Similar to other studies [4] [32], we found lower vaccine acceptance among younger people, those with lower income and education attainment, active smokers, those with a history of a vaccine side-effect, and those with poor self-reported health. We also found that healthcare workers other than physicians were not as protective as physicians were; healthcare workers other than physicians had similar hesitancy levels as non-healthcare workers. Shekhar et al. revealed that only 8% of healthcare workers did not plan to get a vaccine. [35] However, 80% of their responders were providers (e.g., physicians, nurse practitioners), which might have influenced the high acceptance in their study. Healthcare workers other than physicians may have a greater COVID-19 risk than physicians do: nurses and respiratory therapists often have more direct and prolonged patient contact. Special attention to non-physician healthcare workers may be needed, and efforts to understand and address their concerns are critical. Furthermore, people unemployed due to COVID-19 had low vaccine acceptance. Though not common, 12% of vaccine hesitant respondents mentioned distrust of the government or municipal authorities. Japan has a lower level of public trust in the national government compared to other countries: only 4% reported that they had “a lot” of trust in the government. [28] Because of the known association between low vaccine uptake and government distrust [36], authorities may need to adapt their public health responses and messaging to enhance trustworthiness. Our study has limitations. Only users of the most popular social media/messenger app in Japan (“LINE”) could access Corowa-kun. Our results are not representative of those not using this platform or without access to the internet. Approximately three-fourths of participants were women. Only persons with Japanese literacy could answer the survey. Due to the study design—cross-sectional survey—we could not estimate the incidence of vaccine hesitancy. A hypothetical question (“Would you like to receive a COVID-19 vaccine when possible?”) was used because the COVID-19 vaccine was only available for healthcare professionals and for elderly people in a very limited area at the time that the survey was conducted. Finally, the survey answers may not translate into real-world actions by respondents due to other competing priorities and varying epidemiologic and societal conditions at the time a vaccine is available to them. [37] [38] ## Conclusions We created Corowa-kun, a free chatbot, to answer COVID-19 vaccine FAQs using the most popular messenger app in Japan. The chatbot was popular, and nearly 10,000 people participated in a cross-sectional survey that helped us identify vaccine hesitancy risk factors. Vaccine hesitancy decreased among Corowa-kun users. Messenger app chatbots may help people obtain appropriate COVID-19 vaccine information in a timely and effective manner. ## Supporting information supplemental figure 1 [[supplements/257854_file03.docx]](pending:yes) supplemental figure 2 [[supplements/257854_file04.docx]](pending:yes) supplemental document 1 [[supplements/257854_file05.docx]](pending:yes) ## Data Availability The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [T.K], upon reasonable request. ## Conflict of Interest None ## Funding none ## Acknowledgement We appreciate Shinji Hirooka, Shinsuke Oyama, Hozumi Kaneko, Makiko Sakamoto, Hiroaki Asahara, Ryosuke Kitano for their technical support for Corowa-kun. We thank Chaorong Wu and Patrick Ten Eyck for useful discussions around study design. (Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States) * Received May 26, 2021. * Revision received May 26, 2021. * Accepted May 30, 2021. * © 2021, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. The New England journal of medicine 2020; 382(8): 727–33. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2001017&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F30%2F2021.05.26.21257854.atom) 2. 2.World Health Organization. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available at: [https://covid19.who.int](https://covid19.who.int). Accessed April 10th. 3. 3.Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. The New England journal of medicine 2020; 383(27): 2603–15. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2034577&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F30%2F2021.05.26.21257854.atom) 4. 4.Fisher KA, Bloomstone SJ, Walder J, Crawford S, Fouayzi H, Mazor KM. Attitudes Toward a Potential SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine : A Survey of U.S. Adults. Annals of internal medicine 2020; 173(12): 964–73. 5. 5.Sherman SM, Smith LE, Sim J, et al. COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020: 1–10. 6. 6.Taylor S, Landry CA, Paluszek MM, Groenewoud R, Rachor GS, Asmundson GJG. A Proactive Approach for Managing COVID-19: The Importance of Understanding the Motivational Roots of Vaccination Hesitancy for SARS-CoV2. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 575950. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575950&link_type=DOI) 7. 7.Group C. A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20(7): 769–70. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30426-6&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32445713&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F30%2F2021.05.26.21257854.atom) 8. 8.Lazarus JV, Ratzan SC, Palayew A, et al. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat Med 2021; 27(2): 225–8. 9. 9.Bell S, Clarke R, Mounier-Jack S, Walker JL, Paterson P. Parents’ and guardians’ views on the acceptability of a future COVID-19 vaccine: A multi-methods study in England. Vaccine 2020; 38(49): 7789–98. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F30%2F2021.05.26.21257854.atom) 10. 10.Reiter PL, Pennell ML, Katz ML. Acceptability of a COVID-19 vaccine among adults in the United States: How many people would get vaccinated? Vaccine 2020; 38(42): 6500–7. 11. 11.Wang J, Jing R, Lai X, et al. Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8(3). 12. 12.Leng A, Maitland E, Wang S, Nicholas S, Liu R, Wang J. Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China. Vaccine 2021; 39(2): 247–54. 13. 13.Szilagyi PG, Thomas K, Shah MD, et al. National Trends in the US Public’s Likelihood of Getting a COVID-19 Vaccine-April 1 to December 8, 2020. JAMA 2020. 14. 14.de Figueiredo A, Simas C, Karafillakis E, Paterson P, Larson HJ. Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: a large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study. Lancet 2020; 396(10255): 898–908. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F30%2F2021.05.26.21257854.atom) 15. 15.Tanaka Y, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kimura T. History repeats itself in Japan: Failure to learn from rubella epidemic leads to failure to provide the HPV vaccine. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017; 13(8): 1859–60. 16. 16.Hanley SJ, Yoshioka E, Ito Y, Kishi R. HPV vaccination crisis in Japan. Lancet 2015; 385(9987): 2571. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61152-7&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26122153&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F30%2F2021.05.26.21257854.atom) 17. 17.Simms KT, Hanley SJB, Smith MA, Keane A, Canfell K. Impact of HPV vaccine hesitancy on cervical cancer in Japan: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health 2020; 5(4): e223–e34. 18. 18.Glanz JM, Wagner NM, Narwaney KJ, et al. Web-based Social Media Intervention to Increase Vaccine Acceptance: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics 2017; 140(6). 19. 19.Access and Disparities in Access to Health Care [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: [http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr15/access.html](http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr15/access.html). Accessed April 24th. 20. 20.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Frequently Asked Questions about COVID-19 Vaccination. Available at: [https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html](https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html). Accessed April 30. 21. 21.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). Available at: [https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000164708_00079.html](https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000164708_00079.html). Accessed April 30th. 22. 22.Cartoon dog pitches COVID vaccines to sceptical Japanese public. Reuters. Available at: [https://www.reuters.com/artcile/article/us-health-coronavirus-japan-vaccine/cartoon-dog-pitches-covid-vaccines-to-sceptical-japanese-public-idUSKBN2AC0BB](https://www.reuters.com/artcile/article/us-health-coronavirus-japan-vaccine/cartoon-dog-pitches-covid-vaccines-to-sceptical-japanese-public-idUSKBN2AC0BB). Accessed May 13. 23. 23.Japan’s Diverse Regions. JAPANGOV. THE GOVENMENT OF JAPAN. Available at: [https://www.japan.go.jp/regions/index.html](https://www.japan.go.jp/regions/index.html). 24. 24.Wilson SL, Wiysonge C. Social media and vaccine hesitancy. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5(10). 25. 25.Ahmed N, Quinn SC, Hancock GR, Freimuth VS, Jamison A. Social media use and influenza vaccine uptake among White and African American adults. Vaccine 2018; 36(49): 7556–61. 26. 26.Ortiz RR, Shafer A, Cates J, Coyne-Beasley T. Development and Evaluation of a Social Media Health Intervention to Improve Adolescents’ Knowledge About and Vaccination Against the Human Papillomavirus. Glob Pediatr Health 2018; 5: 2333794X18777918. 27. 27. N.L. Oh, C.B. Biddell, B.E. Rhodes, et al., ProvidercommunicationandHPVvaccineuptake:Ameta-analysisandsystematicreview,Preventive Medicine(2021), [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106554](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106554). 28. 28.GALLUP. Wellcome Global Monitor. How dose the world feel about science and health? Country data 2018. Available at: [https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/wgm2018-country-data-all.pdf](https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/wgm2018-country-data-all.pdf). Accessed May 22. 29. 29.Marcelin JR, Cortes-Penfield N, Del Rio C, et al. How the Field of Infectious Diseases Can Leverage Digital Strategy and Social Media Use During a Pandemic. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8(2): ofab027. 30. 30.Yoda T, Katsuyama H. Willingness to Receive COVID-19 Vaccination in Japan. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9(1). 31. 31.Machida M, Nakamura I, Kojima T, et al. Acceptance of a COVID-19 Vaccine in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9(3). 32. 32.Nguyen KH, Srivastav A, Razzaghi H, et al. COVID-19 Vaccination Intent, Perceptions, and Reasons for Not Vaccinating Among Groups Prioritized for Early Vaccination - United States, September and December 2020. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report 2021; 70(6): 217–22. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F30%2F2021.05.26.21257854.atom) 33. 33.Robertson E, Reeve KS, Niedzwiedz CL, et al. Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK household longitudinal study. Brain Behav Immun 2021; 94: 41–50. 34. 34.Painter EM, Ussery EN, Patel A, et al. Demographic Characteristics of Persons Vaccinated During the First Month of the COVID-19 Vaccination Program - United States, December 14, 2020-January 14, 2021. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report 2021; 70(5): 174–7. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm7005e1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F30%2F2021.05.26.21257854.atom) 35. 35.Shekhar R, Sheikh AB, Upadhyay S, et al. COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance among Health Care Workers in the United States. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9(2). 36. 36.Miyachi T, Takita M, Senoo Y, Yamamoto K. Lower trust in national government links to no history of vaccination. Lancet 2020; 395(10217): 31–2. 37. 37.Stern MF, Piasecki AM, Strick LB, et al. Willingness to Receive a COVID-19 Vaccination Among Incarcerated or Detained Persons in Correctional and Detention Facilities - Four States, September-December 2020. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report 2021; 70(13): 473–7. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm7013a3&link_type=DOI) 38. 38.Ajzen I, Brown TC, Carvajal F. Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: the case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2004; 30(9): 1108–21. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0146167204264079&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15359015&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F30%2F2021.05.26.21257854.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000223215500002&link_type=ISI)