A prospective, split-Face, comparative study of combined Q-switch Nd:YAG laser and microdermabrasion versus Q-switch Nd:YAG laser alone in treatment of melasma =============================================================================================================================================================== * Parvaneh Hatami * Hamed Nicknam Asl * Zeinab Aryanian ## Abstract **Background** Melasma is a common disorder of hyperpigmentation with a great effect on quality of life. In an uncontrolled study, a novel combination treatment approach, using a low-fluence Q-switched (QS) Neodymium-doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Nd:YAG) Laser in conjunction with microdermabrasion was shown to be effective in clearance of melasma(1). **Objective** The purpose of the current prospective, controlled study was to determine if microdermabrasion, when combined with Nd:YAG laser, produced significant improvement of melasma compared to Nd:YAG laser alone. **Methods** Twenty patients with bilaterally distributed facial melasma were subjected to QS-Nd:YAG laser therapy with microdermabrasion on one side and laser therapy alone on the other side of their faces every four weeks for three sessions. Photographs were obtained before treatment, one month and three months postoperatively. **Results** Although both sides improved from baseline to the 24th week, there was no statistically significant difference between both sides in regards to MASI (Melasma Area and Severity Index) as well as PGA (Patient Global melasma improvement Assessment) scores. **Conclusion** Combination therapy with Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and microdermabrasion seems to be as effective as Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone and doesn’t have any advantage or disadvantage in comparison with conventional laser therapy. Key words * Q-Switched Laser * Nd-YAG Laser * Melasma * Cloasma Microdermabrasion ## Introduction Melasma is a common cutaneous disorder characterized with symmetrical brown macules and patches with indistinct borders, typically on cheek, forehead and upper lip (2). Melasma can involve all skin types, but it is known to be more prevalent in females of darker skin types (Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI), especially East Asians (2,3).This pigmentation disorder is often a significant source of distress to those affected and has considerable effects on patient’s quality of life as a matter of beauty(4). The etiology of this common disorder is not completely understood, but it is considered that sunlight, genetic predisposition, pregnancy and hormonal therapy including oral contraceptives play more of a role (5-7). It is helpful, before initiation of treatment, to perform an examination using wood’s lamp to recognize the depth of the melanin pigmentation and, thus, determine the type of melasma, including epidermal, dermal or mixed (8). Despite the availability of various treatment modalities, treatment of melasma is often difficult and challenging (9). Different treatment modalities including topical skin care regimens for suppressing melanin production (melanogenesis), chemical peels, micro-needling, mesotherapy, lasers and other light sources have been used with variable rate of success (10-15). Q-switched (QS) Neodymium-doped Yttrium Aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers have been reported to be beneficial in some patients, but occasionally they cause complications like pigmentary change (hypo- or hyperpigmentation). In a study conducted by Kauvar in 2012, a new noninvasive combination treatment approach, using a low-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in conjunction with microdermabrasion was examined and found to be effective in treating melasma (1), but there was no control group in that study. The purpose of the current study is to determine if this novel method is able to produce a significant improvement of melasma when compared with Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone. ## Materials and methods ### Study design We conducted a single-center prospective randomized clinical trial study of adults (>= 18 years of age) with split-face design. Patients diagnosed with moderate to severe melasma clinically, were enrolled. 20 patients (19 women and 1 man, aged 26-50, mean age: 34.2±7.3 years) with melasma lesions were included in this study. Inclusion criteria was patients older than 18 years with bilateral moderate to severe melasma. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, breast feeding, Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI, topical bleaching agent usage within 3 months before recruitment, employment of chemical peels, microdermabrasion or facial laser treatment within 9 months of entry, underlying skin disorders, taking isotretinoin or contraceptive pills during the past six months, sunlight or UV exposures, worsening of lesions or occurrence of post inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) during the study. The presence of moderate to severe melasma was based on a previously described melasma severity scale (16). All patients were informed of the benefits and risks of the study after which they signed an informed consent form. The study was approved by local ethics committee (approval ID: IR.RUMS.REC.1394.279) and registered as IRCT20191228045917N2 in Iranian Registry of clinical Trials. ### Treatment protocol 20 individuals who met the eligibility criteria of the trial were subjected to a detailed review of their clinical history (age, sex, previous treatments, site of involvement) and physical examination. After this initial visit, all patients were given 4% hydroquinone cream (lightening cream Medillan®, Golafshan-e-arayesh, Iran) and adapalen gel (Acnopal®, Caspiantamin, Iran) to apply every other night to both sides of the face for a period of 4 weeks according to previous studies (1,17) and were told to stop applying them one night before each treatment session. One side of the face randomly determined for treating with microdermabrasion by sealed envelopes numbered from 1 to 20 in which the allocation was indicated by simple randomization block. The envelopes were opened in an ascending order. The side allocated to receive microdermabrasion prior to laser therapy, was treated with a total of 3 pass in each session. Microdermabrasion was performed using a standard protocol reported previously (18). The patients washed their face with daily facial cleanser(dry skin pain, Medipain®, Golafshan-e-arayesh, Iran).After degreasing with alcohol and waiting for the skin to dry, 3 pass microdermabrasion was done using 6 mm head and 400 mmHg pressure. The face was then rinsed with water and dried and immediately both sides of patient’s face was treated with Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (COSJET®, WONTECH, South Korea) with these parameters : wave length :1064 nm, fluence : 1.6 - 4 J/cm2 with a 4 or 6 mm spot size, using only 2 laser passes to achieve complete coverage of the affected skin. Visible frost or mild erythema of skin was taken as the end point. At first session, fluence was set at 2J/cm2 for skin type II, 1.8 J/cm2 for skin type III and 1.6 J/cm2 for skin type IV with a 6 mm spot size. On next sessions, fluence was decreased or increased by 0.5-1 J/cm2 according to presence of side effects as well as patient tolerance. We achieved our desired results with fluences ranged from 1.6 to 4 J/cm2. After laser therapy, patient face was cooled down using icepack and was covered with zinc oxide and fluocinolone cream. Patients were asked to apply a repair cream (Therapeutic cream Dr Jila®, Iran Avandfar, Iran) and also a sun-blocker cream (Sunscreen cream, oil free, SPF 60, Dr Jila®, Iran Avandfar, Iran) for 3 days before starting their hydroquinone cream and adapalen gel. The participants were treated three times at regular time intervals of 4 weeks. All patients were examined prior to each treatment session and also 1 and 3 month after last session. All of visits were performed by one dermatologist. On each visit, Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) as well as Patient Global melasma improvement Assessment (PGA) were determined and the patients were asked about any unfavorable side effect such as burning sensation, erythema, edema, blistering, erosion or crust formation and facial asymmetry. Patients were also asked about the improvement of melasma on each side of their face (PGA) on each visit rating that according to the following numerical scale (19): -1: worsening 0: no change 1: slight improvement 2: moderate improvement 3: marked improvement 4: complete clearance The blinded investigator calculated the MASI score that quantifies the extent of the lesion (A), the darkness (D) and the homogeneity (H) of the hyperpigmentation. Each of the 4 areas including forehead, perioral/chin, right and left malar regions was scored. The sum of the severity rating for the darkness and the homogeneity is multiplied by the numeric value of the involved area to calculate the MASI score (range : 0 -48) (20,21), but in this study, MASI score was calculated for each side of face separately (range : 0 -24) with dividing the numeric value of the forehead and perioral / chin by 2. ### Statistical analysis Statistical analysis were undertaken by using SPSS, version 23. P value of 0.05 or less was considered significant. All of the statistical analyses have been done with 95% confidence interval. Chi-square and Mc Nemar’s tests have been used to show correlations. ## Results A total of 20 patients were enrolled in this study out of which 18 patients completed the study with no protocol deviations. The 2 subjects who did not complete the study were unable to come for last laser session or follow up sessions because of scheduling difficulties. The majority of patients were female (95%) and had Fitzpatrick skin type III (80%). Mean age of participants was 34.2±7.3 years ranging from 26 to50. Specific patient demographics is included in table 1. View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/22/2021.05.19.21257291/T1) Table 1. A summary of baseline characteristics of patients. Mean baseline MASI score was 10.3 ±2.13 on the abraded side and 9.8 ±2.32 on the other side (Table2). View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/22/2021.05.19.21257291/T2) Table 2. Means and standard deviations for MASI score on each side of face at baseline and follow up sessions. Figure 1 shows the improvement in MASI score on both sides of the face. The baseline covariate for MASI was significant (P value < 0.001). ![Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/05/22/2021.05.19.21257291/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/22/2021.05.19.21257291/F1) Figure 1: MASI score on abraded versus unabraded side. Abraded group effect: (abraded vs unabraded) P = 0.609. overall time effect: P < 0.001. (M+L: microdermabrasion and laser, L: only laser) It is worthy to note that although both sides improved from baseline to the 24th week (P value < 0.001), there was no statistically significant difference between both sides on 24th week (Figure1). The PGA at second follow up visit on 24th week was 2.6 for abraded side and 2.2 for other side. There was not any statistically significant difference between two sides on 24th week (P value: 0.33), but difference between PGA at 4th week in comparison with PGA at 24th week was meaningful for both sides (Table3). View this table: [Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/22/2021.05.19.21257291/T3) Table 3. Mean value of PGA (Patient Global melasma improvement Assessment) index on both sides of face Adverse effects for both sides were found to be equal and consisted of erythema (60%) and burning sensation (50%) both lasting only for 1 to 2 days. Moderate facial edema lasting up to 4 days was reported by 10% of patients. Blistering, scaring, pigmentary changes and an asymmetric look during or after study were not observed. ## Discussion In this study, 20 patients were treated with Nd:YAG Q-switched laser and microdermabrasion for melasma. Outcome measures selected for this study were subjective and interpreted by both physician and patient and a global evaluation of improvement as well as scoring index (MASI) have been used to help quantify the evaluation. Using these evaluation methods, both sides of the face in our patients improved remarkably, but there was not any significant difference between them. This study confirms the efficacy and safety of Nd:YAG Q-switched laser alone or with microdermabrasion in treatment of melasma. Nd:YAG Q-switched laser has been found to be effective in treating melasma in several studies (22-27), with 67% of patients with moderate to severe disease achieving complete or near-complete clearance after 10 weeks of treatment (22). Kunachak et al in a large-scale study of 533 patients with melasma, found that 97% of patients achieved clearance of melasma with dermabrasion (28), but complications such as keloid formation, milia, post inflammatory hyperpigmentation and loss of skin texture were seen. So dermabrasion is not a standard treatment modality. A noninvasive and minimal form of it, microdermabrasion, had been used in a study by Kauvar who investigated the efficacy of combination of microdermabrasion and low-fluence Q-switched laser in 27 patients with skin photo-type of II to V. All subjects achieved at least a 50% improvement in the appearance of their melasma. More than 80% of the subjects experienced >76% improvement in melasma at follow –up. However, that study lacked the control group (1). According to some authors, combination treatment strategies may provide a more robust clinical outcomes in melsma treatment. Theoretically, microdermabrasion might decrease scattering of laser light and lead to an increase in the depth of penetration of the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser beam. On the other hand, it can help with elimination of epidermal melanin by increasing epidermal skin turn over and exfoliating the stratum corneum. Moreover, it can improve lightening drugs penetration by exfoliating the most superficial layers of stratum corneum. Hence, it seems that microdermabrasion might add to the effect of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in treating melasma. We evaluated this hypothesis by using combination therapy versus Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone in this split-face design study, but contrary to Kauver, we failed to report any difference between these two treatment modalities. This incongruity of results necessitates performing further studies with different methodologies and a larger number of patients to shed more light on this matter. As far as we know, current study is the first prospective randomized clinical trial evaluated efficacy and safety of this new combination. Therefore, we could not compare our results with previous studies. However, both treatment modalities were used previously and their clinical efficacy was found to be superior compared to topical agents (29-30) This study confirmed the efficacy and safety of laser with or without microdermabrasion, but we could not find any difference between two study groups in terms of clinical response or safety profile. In fact, none of our patients experienced post inflammatory hyperpigmentation which could be due to use of lightening agents before initiation of and during the study as well as using conservative setting for laser treatment. It should be borne in mind that a large part of this study was conducted during autumn and winter, which can be an important factor in a reduction in the incidence of sun exposure related side effects. In addition, another explanation for absence of any PIH or recurrence of melasma in our patients might be the fact that our follow up period was not long enough to assess the stability and durability of treatment. Consequently, different results might be expected from future studies with longer follow-up duration. Despite the success of this study, there were some limitations must be considered including lack of devices for objective measures of clinical improvement as well as absence of histopathological evaluation due to disinclination of majority of patients for undergoing biopsy. Using modern modalities for assessment of any change in lesion’s color and melanin content would provide less biased and more reliable results regarding clinical efficacy of both treatment modalities and is highly recommended in future studies. Another limitation of this study was recruiting a small number of patients due to our strict recruitment criteria and the fact that in the city in which study was conducted, the majority of patients had skin photo types IV and higher which made the laser therapy unsuitable for them. The limited number of patients may account for the lack of statistically significant differences between the two groups and also led to inability to perform further subgroup analyses regarding demographics and clinical characteristics of patients. Moreover, even though we followed our patients for 3 months that seems to be a suitable time duration according to previous reports [31], longer follow up periods may lead to a better assessment of this treatment modality as mentioned before. In conclusion, We have shown that combination therapy with Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and microdermabrasion is as effective as Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone and does not add to the effect of laser in treating melasma. Considering our study limitations, further prospective studies with a large number of patients and a longer follow-up period for validating our results are encouraged. ## Data Availability The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author ## Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper. ## Acknowledgments The authors thank Iran’s National Elites Foundation for providing financial support. ## Footnotes * Conflict of interest: none * Received May 19, 2021. * Revision received May 19, 2021. * Accepted May 22, 2021. * © 2021, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Kauvar AN: Successful treatment of melasma using a combination of microdermabrasion and Q-switched Nd: YAG lasers. Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Feb; 44(2):117–24. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22334295&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 2. 2.Werlinger KD, Guevara IL, González CM, Rincón ET, Caetano R, Haley RW, Pandya AG. Prevalence of self-diagnosed melasma among premenopausal Latino women in Dallas and Fort Worth, Tex. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Mar;143(3):424–5 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archderm.143.3.424&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17372115&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000244935000024&link_type=ISI) 3. 3.Naito SK. Fractional photothermolysis treatment for resistant melasma in Chinese females. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007;9 : 161 – 163. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17763024&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 4. 4.Gupta AK, Gover MD, Nouri K, Taylor S.Treatment of melasma: A review of clinical trials. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55:1048–65. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jaad.2006.02.009&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17097400&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000242362000017&link_type=ISI) 5. 5.Pawaskar MD, Parikh P, Markowski T, McMichael AJ, Feldman SR, Balkrishnan R. Melasma and its impact on health-related quality of life in Hispanic women. J Dermatolog Treat. 2007; 18(1):5-9. Review. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17365259&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 6. 6.Tunzi M,Gray GR. Common skin conditions during pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(2):211–218. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17263216&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 7. 7.Passeron T. Melasma pathogenesis and influencing factors - an overview of the latest research. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013; 27:5-6. 8. 8.Kodali S, Guevara IL, Carrigan CR, Daulat S, Blanco G, Boker A, Hynan LS, Pandya AG. A prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled trial of salicylic acid peels in the treatment of melasma in Latin American women. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Dec; 63(6):1030–5. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20889235&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 9. 9.Kang WH, Yoon KH, Lee ES, Kim J, Lee KB, Yim H, Sohn S, Im S. Melasma: histopathological characteristics in 56 Korean patients. Br J Dermatol. 2002 Feb; 146(2):228–37. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1046/j.0007-0963.2001.04556.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11903232&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 10. 10.Cho SB, Kim JS, Kim MJ. Melasma treatment in Korean women using a 1064-nm Q-switched Nd: YAG laser with low pulse energy. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009; 34 e847– e850. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19817757&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 11. 11.Hong SP, Han SS, Choi SJ, Kim MS, Won CH, Lee MW, Choi JH, Moon KC, Kim YJ, Chang SE. Split-face comparative study of 1550 nm fractional photothermolysis and trichloroacetic acid 15% chemical peeling for facial melasma in Asian skin. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2012; 14:81–86. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22372386&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 12. 12.Hwang SW, Oh DJ, Lee D, Kim JW, Park SW. Clinical efficacy of 25% L-ascorbic acid (C’ensil) in the treatment of melasma. J Cutan Med Surg 2009; 13:74–81. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19298775&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 13. 13.Lee MH, Kim HJ, Ha DJ, Paik JH, Kim HY. Therapeutic effect of topical application of linoleic acid and lincomycin in combination with betamethasone valerate in melasma patients. J Korean Med Sci 2002; 17:518–523. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12172049&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 14. 14.Yi J, Hong T, Zeng H, Li P, Li P, Wang S, Chen J, Li P, Zhou J. A Meta-analysis-Based Assessment of Intense Pulsed Light for Treatment of Melasma. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Jun; 44(3):947–952. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01637-x. Epub 2020 Feb 13. PMID: 32055937. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00266-020-01637-x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32055937&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 15. 15.Taylor SC, Torok H, Jones T, Lowe N, Rich P, Tschen E, Menter A, Baumann L, Wieder JJ, Jarratt MM, Pariser D, Martin D, Weiss J, Shavin J, Ramirez N. Efficacy and safety of a new triple-combination agent for the treatment of facial melasma. Cutis. 2003 Jul; 72(1):67–72. 16. 16.Kong SH, Suh HS, Choi YS. Treatment of Melasma with Pulsed-Dye Laser and 1,064-nm Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser: A Split-Face Study. Ann Dermatol. 2018 Feb; 30(1):1–7. doi: 10.5021/ad.2018.30.1.1. Epub 2017 Dec 26. PMID: 29386825; PMCID: PMC5762458 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.5021/ad.2018.30.1.1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29386825&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 17. 17.Alsaad SM, Ross EV, Mishra V, Miller L. A split face study to document the safety and efficacy of clearance of melasma with a 5 ns q switched Nd YAG laser versus a 50 ns q switched Nd YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Dec; 46(10):736–40. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22303. Epub 2014 Nov 19. PMID: 25411141. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/lsm.22303&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25411141&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 18. 18.Small R, Hoang D, Linderman J. A Practical Guide to Chemical Peels, Microdermabrasion, & Topical Products.Lippincott, 2013:111–128. 19. 19.Kroon MW, Wind BS, Meesters AA, Wolkerstorfer A, van der Veen JP, Bos JD, Van der Wal AC, Beek JF. Non-ablative 1550 nm fractional laser therapy not effective for erythema dyschromicum perstans and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: a pilot study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2012 Oct; 23(5):339–44. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21756152&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 20. 20.Pandya AG, Hynan LS, Bhore R, Riley FC, Guevara IL, Grimes P, Nordlund JJ, Rendon M, Taylor S, Gottschalk RW, Agim NG, Ortonne JP. Reliability assessment and validation of the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) and a new modified MASI scoring method. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Jan; 64(1):78-83, 83.e1-2. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.051&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20398960&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 21. 21.Pandya A, Berneburg M, Ortonne JP, Picardo M. Guidelines for clinical trials in melasma. Pigmentation Disorders Academy. Br J Dermatol. 2006 Dec; 156 Suppl 1:21–8. 22. 22.Polnikorn N. Treatment of refractory melasma with the MedLite C6 Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and alpha arbutin: a prospective study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010 Jun; 12(3):126–31. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20482238&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 23. 23.Suh KS, Sung JY, Roh HJ, Jeon YS, Kim YC, Kim ST. Efficacy of the 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in melasma. J Dermatolog Treat. 2011 Aug; 22(4):233–8. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20443754&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 24. 24.Wattanakrai P, Mornchan R, Eimpunth S. Low-fluence Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (1,064 nm) laser for the treatment of facial melasma in Asians. Dermatol Surg. 2010; 36(1):76–87. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20298254&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 25. 25.Chan NP, Ho SG, Shek SY, Yeung CK, Chan HH. A case series of facial depigmentation associated with low fluence Q-switched 1,064□nm Nd:YAG laser for skin rejuvenation and melasma. Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Oct; 42(8):712–9. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20848553&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 26. 26.Kim MJ, Kim JS, Cho SB. Punctate leucoderma after melasma treatment using 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with low pulse energy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Aug; 23(8):960–2. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19207672&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 27. 27.Kim T, Cho SB, Oh SH: Punctate leucoderma after 1064-nm Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser with low-fluence therapy: Is it melanocytopenic or melanopenic?Dermatol Surg.2010; 36:1790–1791. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20961356&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 28. 28.Kunachak S, Leelaudomlipi P, Wongwaisayawan S. Dermabrasion: a curative treatment for melasma. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001 Mar-Apr; 25(2):114–7. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11349301&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 29. 29.Batory M, Wołowiec-Korecka E, Rotsztejn H. The influence of topical 5% tranexamic acid at pH 2.38 with and without corundum microdermabrasion on pigmentation and skin surface lipids. Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14391. doi: 10.1111/dth.14391. Epub 2020 Oct 22. PMID: 33034937. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/dth.14391&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33034937&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 30. 30.Jeong SY, Shin JB, Yeo UC, Kim WS, Kim IH. Low-fluence Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser for melasma with pre-or post-treatment triple combination cream. Dermatol Surg. 2010 Jun;36(6):909–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01523.x. Epub 2010 Apr 1. PMID: 20384749. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01523.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20384749&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom) 31. 31.Namazi N, Hesami A, Ketabi Y. The Split-Face Comparison of the Combined Er-YAG Laser and Hydroquinone 4% With Hydroquinone 4% Alone in the Treatment of Melasma in Iranian Patients: A Prospective, Interventional Case Study. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Winter;11(1):70–73. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2020.12. Epub 2020 Jan 18. PMID: 32099630; PMCID: PMC7008736. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15171/jlms.2020.12&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32099630&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F05%2F22%2F2021.05.19.21257291.atom)