What is known from the existing literature about the available treatments for pelvic floor dysfunction among female athletes? A scoping review protocol

Research team

To facilitate robust and clinically relevant review findings, the research team will include individuals with expertise in evidence synthesis, quantitative and qualitative research methodology, sport physiotherapy and pelvic floor rehabilitation.

Review question(s)

We formulated the following research question: “What is known from the existing literature about the treatments for PFD among female athletes?”

In particular, the objectives of this scoping review will be to:

1. Provide a comprehensive overview of all studies dealing with PFD treatments for the female athletes;

2. Identify and summarize studies according to the type of sport, PFD classified on the basis of the International Continence Society (ICS) standardized terminology, type of treatment and eventually other subgroups that could emerge from the analysis of the included studies.

3. Identify any knowledge gaps of the topic.

Inclusion criteria

Studies will be eligible for inclusion if they meet the following Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) criteria.

• ▪ Population. We will include female athletes of any age, practicing any type of sport and performance level (e.g., professional/elite, amateurs/master/recreational athletes) with any type of PFD.

  The definition of “athlete” used in an individual study as the main criterion will be considered.

• ▪ Concept. Any treatment options (i.e. preventive, conservative, surgery) reported by each study will be considered.

• ▪ Context. This review will consider studies conducted in any context.

Sources. This scoping review will consider any study designs or publication type. No time, geographical, setting and language restrictions will be applied.

Exclusion criteria

Studies that do not meet the specific PCC criteria will be excluded.

Search strategy

An initial limited search of MEDLINE was undertaken to identify articles on the topic and then index terms used to describe the articles was used to develop a full search strategy for MEDLINE (see Table 1, which displays the search strategy for MEDLINE database). The search strategy, including all identified keywords and index terms will be adapted for use in Cochrane Central, Scopus, CINAHLComplete, Embase, PEDro and SPORTDiscus.

In addition, also grey literature (e.g. Google scholar, direct contact with experts in the field of PFD and sports medicine) and the reference lists of all relevant studies will be searched.

Study selection

Once the search strategy has been successfully completed, search results will be collated and imported to EndNote V.X9 (Clarivate Analytics, PA, USA). Duplicates will be removed using the EndNote deduplicator before the file containing a set of unique records is made available to reviewers for further processing (i.e. study screening and selection). The review process will consist of two levels of screening using Rayyan QCRI online software⁸: (1) a title and abstract review and (2) a full-text screening. For both levels, two authors independently screened the articles with conflicts resolved by a third author.

Reasons for the exclusion of any full-text source of evidence will be recorded and reported in the scoping review report. The results of the search will be reported in full in the final scoping review and presented in the latest published version of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram⁹.

Data extraction

An ad-hoc data extraction form will be developed by the reviewers and key information (e.g. authors, country, year of publication, PFD, sport, type of treatment) on the selected articles will be collected. A draft extraction tool is provided (see Table 2, which illustrates the data extraction instrument).

This form will be reviewed by the research team and pre-tested by all reviewers before implementation to ensure that the form captures the information accurately. Charting results is commonly an iterative process during scoping reviews; other data can be added to this form according to the subgroups that could emerge from the analysis of the studies included. Modifications will be detailed in the full scoping review.

Data synthesis

The results will be presented in two ways:

1. Numerically. Studies identified and included will be reported, and the description of the search decision process will be mapped. In addition, extracted data will be summarized in tabular and diagrammatic form. Charting the results is based on an iterative approach, and further categories may be added if considered appropriate.

2. Thematically. A thematic summary will be performed pertaining to themes and key concepts relevant to the research questions and according to subgroups (e.g. PFD, sport, performance level, type of treatment) and to others that could emerge.