ABSTRACT
Objective To identify differences in biomechanics during gait in individuals with acute and persistent low back pain compared with back-healthy controls.
Design Systematic review
Data Sources A search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO in June 2019 and was repeated in December 2020.
Eligibility criteria Studies were included if they reported biomechanical characteristics of individuals with and without low back pain during steady-state or perturbed walking and running. Biomechanical data included spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic, and electromyography variables. The reporting quality and potential for bias of each study was assessed. Data were pooled where possible to compare the standardized mean differences (SMD) between groups.
Results Ninety-seven studies were included. Two studies investigated acute pain and the rest investigated persistent pain. Eight studies investigated running gait. 20% of studies had high reporting quality/low risk of bias. In comparison with back-healthy controls, individuals with persistent low back pain walked more slowly (SMD -0.59 [95% CI -0.77 to -0.42]) and with shorter stride length (−0.38 [-0.60 to -0.16]). There were no differences in the amplitude of motion in the thoracic or lumbar spine, pelvis, or hips in individuals with LBP. During walking, coordination of motion between the thorax and the lumbar spine/pelvis was significantly more in-phase in the LBP groups (−0.60 [-0.90 to -0-.30]), and individuals with LBP exhibited greater amplitude of activation in the paraspinal muscles (0.52 [0.23 to 0.80]).
Summary/Conclusion There is moderate to strong evidence that individuals with persistent LBP demonstrate impairments in walking gait compared with back-healthy controls.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Jo Armour Smith is supported by grant K01HD092612, awarded by the Eugene Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health Szu-Ping Lee is supported by grant K01HD091449 awarded by the Eugene Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a systematic review of published literature
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files
