Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Antibody Responses After a Single Dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers Previously Infected with SARS-CoV-2

Sebastian Havervall, Ulrika Marking, Nina Greilert-Norin, Henry Ng, Ann-Christin Salomonsson, Cecilia Hellström, Elisa Pin, Kim Blom, Sara Mangsbo, Mia Phillipson, Jonas Klingström, Mikael Åberg, Sophia Hober, Peter Nilsson, Charlotte Thålin
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.21256866
Sebastian Havervall
1Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrika Marking
1Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nina Greilert-Norin
1Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry Ng
1Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
2Department of Medical Cell Biology and Science for Life Laboratory Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
MMSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann-Christin Salomonsson
1Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cecilia Hellström
3Department of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisa Pin
3Department of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim Blom
4Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Mangsbo
5Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mia Phillipson
2Department of Medical Cell Biology and Science for Life Laboratory Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonas Klingström
4Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden
6Centre for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mikael Åberg
7Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Chemistry and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sophia Hober
3Department of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Nilsson
3Department of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlotte Thålin
1Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: charlotte.thalin@sll.se
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Recent reports demonstrate robust serological responses to a single dose of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. Data on immune responses following a single-dose adenovirus-vectored vaccine expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) in individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection are however limited, and current guidelines recommend a two-dose regime regardless of preexisting immunity.

Methods We compared spike-specific IgG and pseudo-neutralizing spike-ACE2 blocking antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 wild type and variants B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P1 following two doses of the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 and a single dose of the adenovector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in 232 healthcare workers with and without previous COVID-19.

Findings The post-vaccine levels of spike-specific IgG and neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 wild type and all three variants of concern were similar or higher in participants receiving a single dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine post SARS-CoV-2 infection (both < 11 months post infection (n=37) and ≥ 11 months infection (n=46)) compared to participants who received two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine (n=149).

Interpretation Our data support that a single dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine serves as an effective immune booster after priming with natural SARS-CoV-2 infection up to at least 11 months post infection.

Introduction

Recent reports demonstrate robust serological responses to a single dose of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. These individuals develop spike-specific IgG and neutralizing antibody titers after one dose that are equivalent to or exceeding those observed after the second dose in vaccinees without preexisting immunity (1-7). In a study of 23 SARS-CoV-2 experienced individuals, a substantial enhancement of neutralizing antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 by a single dose mRNA vaccine was noted (6). A second dose mRNA vaccine to individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection add little value in terms of serological titers (1, 4, 7), and may be associated with increased risk of non-severe adverse events (8). Data on immune responses following a single-dose adenovirus-vectored vaccine expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein such as ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection are however limited. Current guidelines recommend a two-dose regime regardless of preexisting immunity (9).

We compared spike-specific IgG and their neutralizing capacity towards SARS-CoV-2 wild type and three variants of concern following two doses of the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 and a single dose of the adenovector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in healthcare workers with and without previous COVID-19.

Methods

The COMMUNITY (COVID-19 Biomarker and Immunity) study (10, 11) investigates long-term immunity after COVID-19 in 2149 healthcare workers at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, included between April 15th and May 8th 2020. Blood samples are obtained every four months and SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG are analyzed by multiplex antigen bead array (FlexMap3D, Luminex Corp) as previously described (10).

Between March 23rd and 31st, 2021, this sub study investigated serological responses following either two doses of BNT162b2 or one dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination in 232 study participants with or without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by seroconversion. Of these, 149 participants received two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine (36 previously infected participants with median age 52 (IQR 41-62), 86% female, and 113 SARS-CoV-2-naïve participants with median age 53 (IQR 42-58), 86 % women), and 83 participants received a single-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (46 participants ≥ 11 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection with median age 49 (IQR 41-60), 83% female, and 37 participants < 11 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection with median age 48 (IQR 40-54), 95 % women). 162 unvaccinated previously SARS-CoV-2 infected study participants with median age 49 (IQR 40-76), 93% female, and 80 unvaccinated seronegative study participants with median age 51 (IQR 41-58), 91% female, were enrolled as control groups.

Blood samples were collected at least two weeks post second dose BNT162b2 or at least one week post single dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. Spike-specific IgG and their neutralizing capacity (analyzed by a pseudo-neutralizing spike-ACE2 assay) against SARS-CoV-2 wild type and variants B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P1 were measured using the V-PLEX SARS-CoV-2 Panel 7 (IgG and ACE2, Meso Scale Diagnostics, USA) and expressed as arbitrary units (AU)/ml. For validation, spike-specific IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 wild type were measured in the same samples using the multiplex antigen bead array (FlexMap3D, Luminex Corp) (10). Group comparisons were performed using Dunn’s Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test. The statistical significance threshold was set at 5%. Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.1.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc, USA). The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority, and informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

Role of the funding source

The funders of the study had no role in study design, data analysis, data collection, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.

Results

The median levels of spike-specific IgG antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 wild type and variants of concern B.1.1.7, B.1.351 and P1 were similar or higher in participants post SARS-CoV-2 infection (both < 11 months post infection and ≥ 11 months post infection) receiving a single dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine compared to participants who received two doses BNT162b2 vaccine (Figure 1 A-D, Figure S1). Neutralizing antibodies towards the SARS-CoV-2 wild type and all three variants reached higher levels in previously infected vaccinees receiving a single dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine than in participants fully vaccinated with BNT162b2 (Figure 2B-D).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1. Spike-specific IgG responses against SARS-CoV-2 wild type and variants following two doses BNT162b2 in individuals with or without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or one dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.

A) Spike-specific IgG responses against wild type (A), B.1.1.7 (B), B.1.351 (C) and P1 (D). Numbers above each cluster indicate median AU/ml. Lines indicate medians with interquartile ranges. AU; arbitrary units, mpi; months post infection, ns; non-significant, *; p<0.05, **; p<0,01 ***; p<0.001, ****; p<0.0001.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2. Neutralizing antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 wild type and variants following two doses BNT162b2 in individuals with or without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or one dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Neutralizing antibody responses against wild type (A), B.1.1.7 (B), B.1.351 (C) and P1 (D). Numbers above each cluster indicate median AU/ml. Lines indicate medians with interquartile ranges. AU; arbitrary units, mpi; months post infection, ns; non-significant, *; p<0.05, **; p<0,01 ***; p<0.001, ****; p<0.0001.

Discussion

A single dose of the adenovector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 following natural infection elicited a robust serological response with broad neutralizing capacity against SARS-CoV-2 wild type and variants of concern. Neutralizing antibody levels exceeded those after two doses of the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2. Our data support that a single dose of adenovector vaccine serves as an efficacious immune booster after priming with natural SARS-CoV-2 infection up to at least 11 months post infection.

Data Availability

Data is available upon reasonable request

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Author contribution

SeH, UM, PN and CT had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. SeH, UM, and CT designed the study, made statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. NG, HN, ACS, CH, EP, MÅ conducted the analysis and the administrative and material support. SeH, UM, KB, SM, JK, MP, MÅ, SoH, PN, CT interpreted the data, and all authors critically revised the manuscript. SoH, PN, CT obtained funding. MP, SoH, PN, CT supervised. All authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Jonas & Christina af Jochnick foundation; Lundblad family foundation; Region Stockholm; Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation; Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab); Erling-Persson family foundation.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Krammer F, Srivastava K, Alshammary H, Amoako AA, Awawda MH, Beach KF, Bermúdez-González MC, Bielak DA, Carreño JM, Chernet RL, Eaker LQ, Ferreri ED, Floda DL, Gleason CR, Hamburger JZ, Jiang K, Kleiner G, Jurczyszak D, Matthews JC, Mendez WA, Nabeel I, Mulder LCF, Raskin AJ, Russo KT, Salimbangon AT, Saksena M, Shin AS, Singh G, Sominsky LA, Stadlbauer D, Wajnberg A, Simon V. Antibody Responses in Seropositive Persons after a Single Dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine. The New England journal of medicine. 2021;384:1372–1374.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.
    Saadat S, Rikhtegaran Tehrani Z, Logue J, Newman M, Frieman MB, Harris AD, Sajadi MM. Binding and Neutralization Antibody Titers After a Single Vaccine Dose in Health Care Workers Previously Infected With SARS-CoV-2. Jama. 2021;325:1467–1469.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.
    Manisty C, Otter AD, Treibel TA, McKnight Á, Altmann DM, Brooks T, Noursadeghi M, Boyton RJ, Semper A, Moon JC. Antibody response to first BNT162b2 dose in previously SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. Lancet (London, England). 2021;397:1057–1058.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Subbarao S, Warrener LA, Hoschler K, Perry KR, Shute J, Whitaker H, O’Brien M, Baawuah F, Moss P, Parry H, Ladhani SN, Ramsay ME, Brown KE, Amirthalingam G. Robust antibody responses in 70-80-year-olds 3 weeks after the first or second doses of Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, United Kingdom, January to February 2021. Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin. 2021;26.
  5. 5.
    Blain H, Tuaillon E, Gamon L, Pisoni A, Miot S, Picot MC, Bousquet J. Spike Antibody Levels of Nursing Home Residents With or Without Prior COVID-19 3 Weeks After a Single BNT162b2 Vaccine Dose. Jama. 2021.
  6. 6.↵
    Reynolds CJ, Pade C, Gibbons JM, Butler DK, Otter AD, Menacho K, Fontana M, Smit A, Sackville-West JE, Cutino-Moguel T, Maini MK, Chain B, Noursadeghi M, Brooks T, Semper A, Manisty C, Treibel TA, Moon JC, Valdes AM, McKnight Á, Altmann DM, Boyton R. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection rescues B and T cell responses to variants after first vaccine dose. Science (New York, NY). 2021.
  7. 7.↵
    Goel RR, Apostolidis SA, Painter MM, Mathew D, Pattekar A, Kuthuru O, Gouma S, Hicks P, Meng W, Rosenfeld AM, Dysinger S, Lundgreen KA, Kuri-Cervantes L, Adamski S, Hicks A, Korte S, Oldridge DA, Baxter AE, Giles JR, Weirick ME, McAllister CM, Dougherty J, Long S, D’Andrea K, Hamilton JT, Betts MR, Luning Prak ET, Bates P, Hensley SE, Greenplate AR, Wherry EJ. Distinct antibody and memory B cell responses in SARS-CoV-2 naïve and recovered individuals following mRNA vaccination. Science immunology. 2021;6.
  8. 8.↵
    Mathioudakis AG, Ghrew M, Ustianowski A, Ahmad S, Borrow R, Papavasileiou LP, Petrakis D, Bakerly ND. Self-Reported Real-World Safety and Reactogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Vaccine Recipient Survey. Life (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;11.
  9. 9.↵
    Sage W. Interim recommendations for use of the ChAdOx1-S [recombinant] vaccine against COVID-19 (AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine AZD1222, SII Covishield, SK Bioscience). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccines-SAGE_recommendation-AZD1222-2021.1: 2021 First issued 10 February, updated 21 April. Report No.: WHO/2019-nCoV/vaccines/SAGE_recommendation/AZD1222/2021.2.
  10. 10.↵
    Rudberg AS, Havervall S, Manberg A, Jernbom Falk A, Aguilera K, Ng H, Gabrielsson L, Salomonsson AC, Hanke L, Murrell B, McInerney G, Olofsson J, Andersson E, Hellstrom C, Bayati S, Bergstrom S, Pin E, Sjoberg R, Tegel H, Hedhammar M, Phillipson M, Nilsson P, Hober S, Thalin C. SARS-CoV-2 exposure, symptoms and seroprevalence in healthcare workers in Sweden. Nature communications. 2020;11:5064.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Havervall S, Rosell A, Phillipson M, Mangsbo SM, Nilsson P, Hober S, Thalin C. Symptoms and Functional Impairment Assessed 8 Months After Mild COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers. Jama. 2021.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 11, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antibody Responses After a Single Dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers Previously Infected with SARS-CoV-2
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Antibody Responses After a Single Dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers Previously Infected with SARS-CoV-2
Sebastian Havervall, Ulrika Marking, Nina Greilert-Norin, Henry Ng, Ann-Christin Salomonsson, Cecilia Hellström, Elisa Pin, Kim Blom, Sara Mangsbo, Mia Phillipson, Jonas Klingström, Mikael Åberg, Sophia Hober, Peter Nilsson, Charlotte Thålin
medRxiv 2021.05.08.21256866; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.21256866
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Antibody Responses After a Single Dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers Previously Infected with SARS-CoV-2
Sebastian Havervall, Ulrika Marking, Nina Greilert-Norin, Henry Ng, Ann-Christin Salomonsson, Cecilia Hellström, Elisa Pin, Kim Blom, Sara Mangsbo, Mia Phillipson, Jonas Klingström, Mikael Åberg, Sophia Hober, Peter Nilsson, Charlotte Thålin
medRxiv 2021.05.08.21256866; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.21256866

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (549)
  • Anesthesia (134)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1745)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (310)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (649)
  • Epidemiology (10770)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (582)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2927)
  • Geriatric Medicine (286)
  • Health Economics (530)
  • Health Informatics (1917)
  • Health Policy (832)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (740)
  • Hematology (289)
  • HIV/AIDS (626)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12493)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (684)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (318)
  • Neurology (2778)
  • Nursing (150)
  • Nutrition (431)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (553)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (596)
  • Oncology (1451)
  • Ophthalmology (440)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (254)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (378)
  • Pediatrics (863)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (361)
  • Primary Care Research (333)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2625)
  • Public and Global Health (5331)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1001)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (592)
  • Respiratory Medicine (721)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (288)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (124)