Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Safety of Continuous Erector Spinae Catheters in Chest Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

L.D White, B. Riley, K. Davis, C. Thang, A. Mitchell, C. Abi-fares, W. Basson, C. Anstey
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.06.21256789
L.D White
1Regional Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine Fellow, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lw844{at}uowmail.edu.au
B. Riley
2Intensive Care Senior Registrar, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Davis
3Resident Medical Officer, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia @keirandavis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Thang
4Intensive Care Medicine Principal House Officer, Caboolture Hospital, Caboolture, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Mitchell
5Consultant Anaesthetist, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Abi-fares
5Consultant Anaesthetist, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Basson
5Consultant Anaesthetist, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Anstey
8Associate Professor, Griffith University, Birtinya, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Summary

The erector spinae block is an efficacious analgesic option for the management of rib fracture related pain. Despite there being minimal published data specifically addressing the safety profile of this block, many societies have made statements regarding its safety and its use as an alternative to traditional regional anaesthesia techniques in patients at risk of complications. The primary aim of this study was to characterise the safety profile of erector spinae plane block catheters by determining the incidence of early complications. The secondary aims of this study was to characterise the incidence of late adverse events, as well as, the erector spinae plane block catheter failure rate. We analysed electronic medical record data of patients who had an erector spinae plane block catheter inserted for the management of rib fractures between November 2017 to September 2020. To assess early adverse events data collection included hypotension, hypoxaemia, local anaesthetic systemic toxicity and pneumothorax thought to be associated with erector spinae plane block catheter insertion. Late complications included catheter site infection and catheter site haematoma. Two hundred and twenty four patients received a total of 244 continuous erector spinae catheters during the study period. Following the insertion of the erector spinae there were no immediate complications such as hypotension, hypoxia, local anaesthetic toxicity or pneumothorax. Of all blocks inserted 7.7% were removed due to catheter failure (OR = 8.4 per 100 catheters; 95%CI = 5.1 to 13.9 per 100 catheters). This resulted in a failure rate of 1.9 per 1000 catheter days (95%CI = 1.1 to 6.7 catheter days). Late complications included two erythematous catheter sites and two small haematomas not requiring intervention. The odds of a minor late complication was 16.7 per 1,000 catheters (95%CI = 6.1 to 45.5 per 1,000 catheters). In conclusion, this study supports the statements made by regional anaesthesia societies regarding the safety of the erector spinae plane block. Based on the results presented in this population of trauma patients, the erector spinae plane block catheter is a low risk analgesic technique which may be performed in the presence of abnormal coagulation status or systemic infection.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

Retrospective study

Funding Statement

No funding was provided for this study

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Prince Charles Human Research Ethics Committee, QLD Australia

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Financial Disclosures: None

  • Conflicts of interest: None

  • LW: Study design, data curation, statistical analysis, writing-reviewing and editing

  • BR: Study design, data curation, writing, reviewing and editing

  • KD: Study design, manuscript writing, reviewing, referencing and editing

  • CT Study design, Data Curation, Writing-Reviewing and Editing

  • AM: Study design, manuscript writing, reviewing and editing

  • CA: Study design, manuscript writing, reviewing and editing

  • WB: Study design, manuscript writing, reviewing and editing

  • CA: Study design, Statistical analysis, reviewing, editing and writing

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 14, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Safety of Continuous Erector Spinae Catheters in Chest Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Safety of Continuous Erector Spinae Catheters in Chest Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
L.D White, B. Riley, K. Davis, C. Thang, A. Mitchell, C. Abi-fares, W. Basson, C. Anstey
medRxiv 2021.05.06.21256789; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.06.21256789
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Safety of Continuous Erector Spinae Catheters in Chest Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
L.D White, B. Riley, K. Davis, C. Thang, A. Mitchell, C. Abi-fares, W. Basson, C. Anstey
medRxiv 2021.05.06.21256789; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.06.21256789

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Anesthesia
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (754)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3288)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (277)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1169)
  • Epidemiology (13357)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (898)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5147)
  • Geriatric Medicine (481)
  • Health Economics (782)
  • Health Informatics (3264)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1189)
  • Hematology (429)
  • HIV/AIDS (1017)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14620)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (912)
  • Medical Education (476)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (522)
  • Neurology (4918)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (726)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (882)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2518)
  • Ophthalmology (723)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (542)
  • Pediatrics (1299)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (549)
  • Primary Care Research (556)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4205)
  • Public and Global Health (7497)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1704)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1011)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (479)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (547)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (205)