Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The performance of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test as a tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population: A survey of routine laboratory RT-PCR test results from the region of Münster, Germany

View ORCID ProfileAndreas Stang, Johannes Robers, Birte Schonert, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Angela Spelsberg, Ulrich Keil, Paul Cullen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.06.21256289
Andreas Stang
1Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany; School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston University, Boston, USA
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andreas Stang
  • For correspondence: imibe.dir@uk-essen.de
Johannes Robers
2MVZ Labor Münster Hafenweg GmbH, Hafenweg 9-11; 48155 Münster, Germany
MTA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Birte Schonert
2MVZ Labor Münster Hafenweg GmbH, Hafenweg 9-11; 48155 Münster, Germany
MTA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
3Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Spelsberg
4Tumorzentrum Aachen e.V., Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
MD, SM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Keil
5Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149 Münster
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Cullen
2MVZ Labor Münster Hafenweg GmbH, Hafenweg 9-11; 48155 Münster, Germany
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Summary

Objectives To evaluate the population-based performance of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test as a tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic in 2020.

Methods We analysed SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results of 162,457 people living in Münster, Germany screened at nursing homes, testing sites, at schools, regional hospitals, and by general practitioners. All PCRs were done with the same cobas SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR system (Roche Diagnostics). We stratified positive RT-PCR results by cycle threshold (Ct) values, periods of the national test strategy, age, sex, and symptoms.

Results Among 162,457 individuals, 4164 (2.6%) had a positive RT-PCR test result, defined as Ct<40. Depending on the national test strategy, higher positive rates were associated with testing predominantly symptomatic people. Children (0-9 years) and older adults (70+ years). Only 40.6% of test positives showed low Ct values < 25 (potentially infectious). The percentage of Ct values below 25 was lower among children (0-9), adolescents (10-19), and among the elderly (70+ years).

Conclusions RT-PCR testing as a tool for mass screening should not be used alone as a base for pandemic decision making including measures such as quarantine, isolation, and lockdown.

Competing Interest Statement

Paul Cullen has received speakers fees from Roche Diagnostics. None of the other authors declares any conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

not applicable

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Declaration of interest Paul Cullen has received speaker’s fees from Roche Diagnostics. None of the other authors declares any conflict of interest.

  • johannes.robers{at}labor-muenster.de

  • birte.schonert{at}labor-muenster.de

  • k-h.joeckel{at}uk-essen.de

  • spelsberg{at}tuzac.de

  • keilu{at}uni-muenster.de

  • p.cullen{at}labor-muenster.de

  • Email address of Ulrich Keil corrected.

Data Availability

Anonymised data are available on reasonable request and can be provided by the corresponding author.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 19, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The performance of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test as a tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population: A survey of routine laboratory RT-PCR test results from the region of Münster, Germany
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The performance of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test as a tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population: A survey of routine laboratory RT-PCR test results from the region of Münster, Germany
Andreas Stang, Johannes Robers, Birte Schonert, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Angela Spelsberg, Ulrich Keil, Paul Cullen
medRxiv 2021.05.06.21256289; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.06.21256289
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The performance of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test as a tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population: A survey of routine laboratory RT-PCR test results from the region of Münster, Germany
Andreas Stang, Johannes Robers, Birte Schonert, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Angela Spelsberg, Ulrich Keil, Paul Cullen
medRxiv 2021.05.06.21256289; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.06.21256289

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (280)
  • Allergy and Immunology (580)
  • Anesthesia (141)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1962)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (253)
  • Dermatology (187)
  • Emergency Medicine (335)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (703)
  • Epidemiology (11123)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (629)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3196)
  • Geriatric Medicine (310)
  • Health Economics (567)
  • Health Informatics (2049)
  • Health Policy (864)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (789)
  • Hematology (310)
  • HIV/AIDS (685)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12742)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (708)
  • Medical Education (318)
  • Medical Ethics (92)
  • Nephrology (337)
  • Neurology (3004)
  • Nursing (165)
  • Nutrition (465)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (589)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (614)
  • Oncology (1561)
  • Ophthalmology (478)
  • Orthopedics (186)
  • Otolaryngology (266)
  • Pain Medicine (202)
  • Palliative Medicine (57)
  • Pathology (403)
  • Pediatrics (914)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (386)
  • Primary Care Research (355)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2799)
  • Public and Global Health (5613)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1101)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (637)
  • Respiratory Medicine (764)
  • Rheumatology (341)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (315)
  • Sports Medicine (289)
  • Surgery (348)
  • Toxicology (48)
  • Transplantation (159)
  • Urology (133)