Abstract
Objectives To describe the content and methodological quality of local physiotherapy and nursing treatment protocols specifically regarding physical activity promotion in patients hospitalised with myocardial infarction.
Design Cross-sectional study comprising the analysis of 18 physiotherapy and 14 nursing protocols.
Setting Protocols from twenty Dutch hospitals were used.
Main outcome measures Data were extracted from protocols for patients hospitalised with myocardial infarction according to a standardized data-extraction procedure. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the content of protocols, in specific, treatment goals, interventions, clinimetrics and discharge criteria. Methodological quality of the protocols was examined using the AGREE-II tool.
Results Therapeutic goals concerning physical activity were described in 83% of the physiotherapy protocols and in 7% of the nursing protocols. Therapeutic interventions concerning physical activity were described in 100% of the physiotherapy protocols and in 57% of the nursing protocols. Two (14%) of the fourteen interventions described in the physiotherapy protocols and none in the nursing protocols, were interpreted as physical activity promotion. All protocols were rated as having low methodological quality, mainly due to a lack of supporting scientific evidence. The overall quality was rated with an average score of 3 out of 7 (range: 1-5).
Conclusions Physiotherapy and nursing protocols for hospitalized patients with myocardial infarction are primarily aimed at physical activity under supervision, rather than physical activity promotion. Our work provides physiotherapists and nurses insights in how to further improve the content and methodological quality of their local treatment protocols for patients hospitalised with myocardial infarction.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not Applicable
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available on reasonable request to the first author.
