Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

American older adults in COVID-19 Times:Vulnerability types, aging attitudes and emotional responses

Mingqi Fu, Jing Guo, Xi Chen, Qilin Zhang
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.29.21256178
Mingqi Fu
aCenter for Social Security Studies, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing Guo
bDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P. R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xi Chen
cDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qilin Zhang
aCenter for Social Security Studies, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: qilinzhang@whu.edu.cn
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The coronavirus disease aroused challenges to the emotional well-being of vulnerable older adults in hard-hit areas. This study investigates different vulnerability types among American older adults and how modes of vulnerability are associated with aging attitudes and emotional responses.

Methods Using Latent Class Analysis, we investigated 2003 respondents aged over 50 from HRS. Hierarchical linear regressions with the affective profile as cluster identity were used to examine the relationship between vulnerability type and positive aging attitudes with positive and negative emotional responses.

Results We detected three vulnerability types among American older adults: the slight vulnerability (72%), the healthcare use vulnerability (19%), and the dual vulnerabilities (9%). No significant difference in positive emotions was found between vulnerability types. However, more negative emotions were found among older adults with healthcare use vulnerability (B=0.746, SE=0.759) and dual vulnerabilities (B=1.186, SE=0.274) than those with slight vulnerability. Positive aging attitudes associate with more positive emotions (B=0.266, SE=0.017) but less negative emotions (B=-0.183, SE=0.016) and had significant moderation effects on the relationship between vulnerability types and negative emotional responses (B=-0.118, SE=0.045).

Conclusion Older adults’ emotional well-being should not be neglected as they deserve the support of prevention and intervention strategies, in particular when they have vulnerabilities in healthcare use and financial sustainment. Female, non-white races, and those aged below 65, been uncoupled, less educated, and with ADL difficulties should prioritize.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

This manuscripte is not based on clinical trials

Funding Statement

None

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the University of Michigan's Institutional Review Aboard

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data in this study was from Health and Retirement Survey (HRS). Processing code of this study is available by mailing to Dr. MQ Fu (hdwyandot{at}163.com)

https://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 03, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
American older adults in COVID-19 Times:Vulnerability types, aging attitudes and emotional responses
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
American older adults in COVID-19 Times:Vulnerability types, aging attitudes and emotional responses
Mingqi Fu, Jing Guo, Xi Chen, Qilin Zhang
medRxiv 2021.04.29.21256178; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.29.21256178
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
American older adults in COVID-19 Times:Vulnerability types, aging attitudes and emotional responses
Mingqi Fu, Jing Guo, Xi Chen, Qilin Zhang
medRxiv 2021.04.29.21256178; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.29.21256178

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (280)
  • Allergy and Immunology (579)
  • Anesthesia (140)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1947)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (252)
  • Dermatology (184)
  • Emergency Medicine (333)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (699)
  • Epidemiology (11102)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (624)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3168)
  • Geriatric Medicine (309)
  • Health Economics (561)
  • Health Informatics (2042)
  • Health Policy (863)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (782)
  • Hematology (310)
  • HIV/AIDS (682)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12720)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (707)
  • Medical Education (317)
  • Medical Ethics (92)
  • Nephrology (334)
  • Neurology (2986)
  • Nursing (164)
  • Nutrition (463)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (589)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (614)
  • Oncology (1552)
  • Ophthalmology (477)
  • Orthopedics (185)
  • Otolaryngology (266)
  • Pain Medicine (202)
  • Palliative Medicine (57)
  • Pathology (403)
  • Pediatrics (913)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (381)
  • Primary Care Research (355)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2785)
  • Public and Global Health (5591)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1094)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (635)
  • Respiratory Medicine (760)
  • Rheumatology (339)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (311)
  • Sports Medicine (289)
  • Surgery (343)
  • Toxicology (48)
  • Transplantation (159)
  • Urology (132)