Abstract
During the SARS-COV2 pandemic, there has been a persistent call for universal testing to better inform policy decisions. However, a little considered aspect of this call is the relationship between a test’s accuracy and the tested demographic. What are the implications of frequent, universal testing in otherwise asymptomatic demographics? By applying Bayesian statistics, it becomes clear that as the odds of having COVID decreases, there is a non-linear increase in the odds that each positive test is, in fact, a false positive. This phenomenon has precedence in the historical narrative surrounding universal mammogram screening which is no longer recommended due to the unacceptably high rate of false positives. The solution to combat the inflation of false positives is also suggested by Bayesian statistics: intelligently integrating multiple COVID diagnostic tests and symptoms via Bayes’ Theorem, an approach conceptually similar to pre-screening for mammograms. This extra information is readily available (e.g. olfactory function and fever) and will minimize the economic and emotional costs incurred by false positives while simultaneously improving the information available for policy-makers. In summary, along with the push for universal testing should be an equally rigorous approach to interpreting the test results.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Searle Scholars Program and NIH New Innovator award (1DP2GM123458) to JMK. The funders had no role in data collection, analysis, or interpretation. This article was not paid for by a pharmaceutical company or other agency. The corresponding author (CTM) assumes full responsibility for submission.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of the University of Colorado Boulder exempted this research as no human participants were involved.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Updated the false positive rate of the olfactory test with 96% sensitivity and 70% specificity from 82% to 85%.
Data Availability
Code required to recreate the analysis is available on request from lead author.
Data Availability
Code required to recreate the analysis is available on request from lead author.
