Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Design and evaluation of mobile monitoring campaigns for air pollution exposure assessment in epidemiologic cohorts

View ORCID ProfileMagali N. Blanco, View ORCID ProfileAnnie Doubleday, View ORCID ProfileElena Austin, View ORCID ProfileJulian D. Marshall, View ORCID ProfileEdmund Seto, View ORCID ProfileTimothy Larson, View ORCID ProfileLianne Sheppard
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255641
Magali N. Blanco
aDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Magali N. Blanco
  • For correspondence: magali@uw.edu
Annie Doubleday
aDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Annie Doubleday
Elena Austin
aDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elena Austin
Julian D. Marshall
bDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Washington, 201 More Hall, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Julian D. Marshall
Edmund Seto
aDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Edmund Seto
Timothy Larson
aDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195
bDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Washington, 201 More Hall, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Timothy Larson
Lianne Sheppard
aDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195
cDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lianne Sheppard
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Mobile monitoring makes it possible to estimate the long-term trends of less commonly measured pollutants through the collection of repeated short-term samples. While many different mobile monitoring approaches have been taken, few studies have looked at the importance of study design when the goal is application to epidemiologic cohort studies. Air pollution concentrations include random variability and systematic variability, and we hypothesize that mobile campaigns benefit from temporally balanced designs that randomly sample from all seasons of the year, days of the week, and hours of the day. We carried out a simulation study of fixed-site monitors to better understand the role of short-term mobile monitoring design on the prediction of long-term air pollution exposure surfaces. Specifically, we simulated three archetypal sampling designs using oxides of nitrogen (NOx) monitoring data from 69 California air quality system (AQS) sites: (1) a year-around, Balanced Design, (2) a Rush Hours Design, and (3) a Business Hours Design. We used Monte Carlo resampling to investigate the range of possible outcomes (i.e., the resulting annual average concentration prediction) from each design against the “truth”, the actual monitoring data. We found that the Balanced Design consistently yielded the most accurate annual averages; Rush Hours and Business Hours Designs generally resulted in comparatively more biased estimates and model predictions. Importantly, the superior performance of the Balanced Design was evident when predictions were evaluated against true concentrations but less detectable when predictions were evaluated against the measurements from the same sampling campaign since these were themselves biased. This result is important since mobile monitoring campaigns that use their own measurements to test the robustness of the results may underestimate the level of bias in their results. Appropriate study design is crucial for mobile monitoring campaigns aiming to assess accurate long-term exposure in epidemiologic cohorts. Campaigns should aim to implement balanced designs that sample during all seasons of the year, days of the week, and all or most hours of the day to produce generally unbiased, long-term averages. Furthermore, differential exposure misclassification could result from unbalanced designs, which may result in misleading health effect estimates in epidemiologic investigations.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Adult Changes in Thought - Air Pollution (ACT-AP) Study (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [NIEHS], National Institute on Aging [NIA], R01ES026187), and BEBTEH: Biostatistics, Epidemiologic & Bioinformatic Training in Environmental Health (NIEHS, T32ES015459). Research described in this article was conducted under contract to the Health Effects Institute (HEI), an organization jointly funded by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Assistance Award No. CR-83998101) and certain motor vehicle and engine manufacturers. The contents of this article do not necessarily reflect the views of HEI, or its sponsors, nor do they necessarily reflect the views and policies of the EPA or motor vehicle and engine manufacturers.  Neither the authors or their institutions received payment or services from any additional third parties for any aspect of the submitted work at any time.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

No IRB/oversight body was required because this study did not involve human subjects.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Air pollution data are available through the EPA. The covariates used in this analysis for regulatory sites are freely available through various online sources and may be available from the authors upon request.

https://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/download_files.html

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 23, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Design and evaluation of mobile monitoring campaigns for air pollution exposure assessment in epidemiologic cohorts
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Design and evaluation of mobile monitoring campaigns for air pollution exposure assessment in epidemiologic cohorts
Magali N. Blanco, Annie Doubleday, Elena Austin, Julian D. Marshall, Edmund Seto, Timothy Larson, Lianne Sheppard
medRxiv 2021.04.21.21255641; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255641
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Design and evaluation of mobile monitoring campaigns for air pollution exposure assessment in epidemiologic cohorts
Magali N. Blanco, Annie Doubleday, Elena Austin, Julian D. Marshall, Edmund Seto, Timothy Larson, Lianne Sheppard
medRxiv 2021.04.21.21255641; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255641

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Occupational and Environmental Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (161)
  • Allergy and Immunology (414)
  • Anesthesia (90)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (857)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (159)
  • Dermatology (97)
  • Emergency Medicine (248)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (393)
  • Epidemiology (8557)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (383)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1749)
  • Geriatric Medicine (167)
  • Health Economics (372)
  • Health Informatics (1239)
  • Health Policy (620)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (467)
  • Hematology (196)
  • HIV/AIDS (372)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10292)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (553)
  • Medical Education (192)
  • Medical Ethics (51)
  • Nephrology (211)
  • Neurology (1676)
  • Nursing (97)
  • Nutrition (249)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (326)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (450)
  • Oncology (928)
  • Ophthalmology (263)
  • Orthopedics (101)
  • Otolaryngology (172)
  • Pain Medicine (112)
  • Palliative Medicine (40)
  • Pathology (252)
  • Pediatrics (534)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (248)
  • Primary Care Research (207)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1765)
  • Public and Global Health (3835)
  • Radiology and Imaging (623)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (320)
  • Respiratory Medicine (520)
  • Rheumatology (208)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (166)
  • Sports Medicine (158)
  • Surgery (190)
  • Toxicology (36)
  • Transplantation (101)
  • Urology (76)